Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Polarion Requirements Logo

Polarion Requirements pros and cons

Vendor: Siemens
3.7 out of 5
952 followers
Start review

Pros & Cons summary

Polarion Requirements excels in managing complex hardware, software, and mechanical systems with transparency and traceability. Its open APIs allow easy customization, especially with Siemens Teamcenter. However, challenges include licensing complexity, difficulty with integration for non-programmers, and limits with large workbooks. Collaboration features are strong, but automated document comparison is lacking. Usability benefits from link tracing and collaboration, yet risk assessment and instability with many work items need enhancement.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Polarion Requirements enhances transparency and manages complex product systems with diverse areas such as hardware, software, and mechanical components.
Its flexibility, configurability, and user-friendliness stand out, along with valuable features like link tracing and sequence training.
The platform allows easy customization through open APIs and integrates with other tools, beneficial for industries like automotive.
Polarion Requirements effectively manages specifications within collaborative work-like documents, facilitating information exchange across teams.
The traceability function, along with historical and cross-referencing capabilities, provides superior traceability features.

CONS

The license policy is complex, requiring different models for different roles, and lacks clarity on the best approach.
Handling more than one thousand work items in a live-book becomes nearly impossible, leading to system instability.
Polarion Requirements faces challenges in test management, such as the missing test case ordering feature.
Integration can be difficult without knowledge of computer science or programming.
Risk assessment functionalities like FMEA risk management need improvement.
 

Polarion Requirements Pros review quotes

NK
Mar 7, 2024
We can easily customize it because of the web services and open APIs. Also, the APIs are available. We integrated Polarion with one of Siemens' products, Teamcenter, which is especially useful for automotive industries. There is an open API for integration with Jira as well, so for me, customization is a strong point.
Read full review
Effendy Mohamed - PeerSpot reviewer
May 12, 2025
The most beneficial features of Polarion Requirements for traceability include the traceability function and also the historical and matchmaking or cross-referencing, which was very good.
Read full review
IZ
Oct 13, 2019
I like the way this solution is structured.
Read full review
Buyer's Guide
Polarion Requirements
May 2025
Free Report: Polarion Requirements Reviews and More
Learn what your peers think about Polarion Requirements. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user793713 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 5, 2019
The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now.
Read full review
IZ
Jan 15, 2020
A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization.
Read full review
Sutapa Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 14, 2023
The solution is especially great for organizing folders effectively.
Read full review
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 24, 2024
In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps.
Read full review
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 20, 2020
Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable.
Read full review
reviewer2009157 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 11, 2022
I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is.
Read full review
reviewer2264979 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 19, 2024
My company mainly utilizes the product for documenting internal standards, guidelines, and requirements. Currently, we're focusing on using it for internal purposes, but the vision is to expand its usage to include contract requirements and tracking functionalities. While we're not there yet, it has proven effective for managing our internal documentation needs.
Read full review
Show 3 more reviews (out of 13)
 

Polarion Requirements Cons review quotes

NK
Mar 7, 2024
The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management.
Read full review
Effendy Mohamed - PeerSpot reviewer
May 12, 2025
The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor.
Read full review
IZ
Oct 13, 2019
If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable.
Read full review
Buyer's Guide
Polarion Requirements
May 2025
Free Report: Polarion Requirements Reviews and More
Learn what your peers think about Polarion Requirements. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JuanCarlos Lopez - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 25, 2023
We encountered numerous challenges, such as issues with requirements, project management, timing, and planning. The main problem with Polarion at the outset, I believe, was our limited understanding of the planning phase. During that time, we were more focused on change management related to requirements. Recognizing the importance of planning has been a key realization for us. Another mistake we made was not comprehending the need to document these requirements to manage all the work items effectively. Now, we understand the significance of this documentation. As a result of these insights, we have started to see a growing number of competitors from Polarion in this field. One potential improvement could be enabling Polarion to export work items not just to Microsoft Office but also to other office tools.
Read full review
it_user793713 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 5, 2019
The one thing I would mention is the license policy is a little bit difficult. For different roles, you will need different license models. That seems a little bit difficult for us. Especially when you introduce such a complex system, you want to know the right way is to do licensing. It's not clear what that best way would be. The solution will be here for a long time, and I just think it could be more clear.
Read full review
IZ
Jan 15, 2020
It is stable enough but if you would like to work with more requirement objects, then you will get timeouts.
Read full review
Sutapa Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 14, 2023
The usability of the solution should also be improved.
Read full review
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 24, 2024
In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily understandable for end-users.
Read full review
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 20, 2020
Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature.
Read full review
reviewer2009157 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 11, 2022
One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration.
Read full review
Show 4 more reviews (out of 14)

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Requirements Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Jira vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Jira vs Polarion Requirements
IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements Logo
IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements
Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements
IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements Logo
IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements
Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements
OpenText Dimensions RM vs Polarion Requirements Logo
OpenText Dimensions RM vs Polarion Requirements
See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Requirements Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Jira vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Jira vs Polarion Requirements
IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements Logo
IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements
Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements
IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements Logo
IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements
Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements
OpenText Dimensions RM vs Polarion Requirements Logo
OpenText Dimensions RM vs Polarion Requirements
See all alternatives
Related questions
  • 40
Serena Dimensions RM vs. IBM DOORS
  • 1
When evaluating Application Requirements Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 23
How would you compare IBM Rational DOORS with other Application Requirements Management solutions for IT projects?
  • 3
Why is Application Requirements Management important for companies?