PTC Integrity Requirements Connector vs Polarion Requirements comparison

"In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps."

"Polarion Requirements is a really great product despite the limitations I mentioned and the price which is getting more and more expensive."

"The most beneficial features of Polarion Requirements for traceability include the traceability function and also the historical and matchmaking or cross-referencing, which was very good."

"A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization."

"I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is."

"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."

"It is easier to produce documents using the platform."

"The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now, as we have very complex products and make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, and to get the overview of all the requirements into a system at that sizing is the main advantage we have in the organization now."

"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."

"I am somewhat satisfied with Polarion Requirements' functionality, but I feel a lack of certain functions regarding the review, which is a bit too limited."

"In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily understandable for end-users."

"The user configuration had some issues; you need to know all the details, so it's not really friendly for those who are not IT savvy."

"Integration can be a little tricky if you're not aware of basic computer science or programming language."

"The usability of the solution should also be improved."

"I would rate this product a two out of 10."

"It is not a stable solution, as we had issues with shared licenses."

"The one thing I would mention is the license policy is a little bit difficult."

"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."

"The pricing model is flexible. You don't have to pay for the full functionalities. And it's a one-time investment for the licenses. You purchase what you need and then can work with that."

"The product's price is high."

"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."

"I believe the cost is subjective. It seems a bit pricey, but it depends on your perspective. To provide some context, I compared the prices with GitLab and Jira. Unfortunately, I couldn't find Jira's prices. However, GitLab costs around 40 euros, and DeepLab, which I recently discovered, also falls in a similar price range. I'm not sure about DeepLab's features or interface improvements, as they might have been implementing requirements management over the past six months. In contrast, Polarion costs around 50 to 60 euros based on the 2021 prices I have. While it may seem a bit expensive, it's worth considering whether the additional investment, perhaps around 68 euros per user, is justified. It might appear costly at first glance, but it's essential to acknowledge that it can greatly streamline your work processes."

"Polarion Requirements is a little pricey."

"I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."