Jedox vs QPR Metrics comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Jedox and QPR Software are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Jedox is ranked #13, while QPR Software is ranked #20. Jedox holds a 3.1% mindshare in BPM, compared to QPR Software’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jedox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of QPR Software users who would recommend it.

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

2,732 Views
1,803 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QPR Metrics

Read 3 QPR Metrics reviews

1,043 Views
1,043 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jedox

QPR Metrics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

QPR Metrics and Jedox compete in business performance management solutions. Jedox has the upper hand due to its robust features, although QPR Metrics excels in pricing and support.

Features: QPR Metrics is noted for strong performance measurement, strategic planning, and process improvements. Jedox offers extensive planning, analytics, and reporting that integrate with existing systems and provide detailed forecasting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QPR Metrics offers straightforward deployment, ensuring quick implementation. Jedox has a more complex deployment but provides excellent customer service with extensive support and training resources.

Pricing and ROI: QPR Metrics is more cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. Jedox's higher costs result in substantial long-term ROI with features supporting complex business environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Jedox vs. QPR Metrics Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. QPR Metrics

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QPR Metrics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Jedox is 3.1%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR Metrics is 2.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jedox	3.1%
QPR Metrics	2.5%
Other	94.4%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Amol Ghoddke

Manager, Finance and Business Intelligence at NIDA Theatres

The solution provides dynamic reports while being easy to use

There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. The other issue is the dependence on the partner network. We used to deal directly with Jedox, but now it is all through partners, and Jedox's representatives are not in the picture anymore. It's not that partners are not doing a good job, but you're not dealing with the company directly since it's a partner most of the time. If you build your know-how within the company, it's good. Otherwise, the dependence on partners could end up being more costly. Suppose you do your development or don't need to develop constantly by starting with a sprint, deciding what you want to do, and setting up the cubes, databases, and everything correctly. In that case, you only need to develop different reports using the same data. However, it could be costly if you constantly need to develop reports or different cubes and store different systems without the in-house know-how.

Read full review

Wissam H

Change Management Consultant at a analyst firm with self employed

You can use the process mapping module to build processes that can be converted into SOPs. Licensing is unreasonable.

The process-mapping module helped the BPR team in creating detailed process maps quickly. The process converter tool helped the team establish baseline SOPs that can be taken further to implement comprehensive documentation that serves the departments’ needs. The content management part helped in sharing the processes safely with the rest of the organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The EPM is the most valuable feature."

"The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features."

"The data entry point is most valuable, and the way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."

"With Jedox, those kinds of pain points have been removed, and now if I create my dashboard once, people just need to add the data or pull the data, or the data just comes in on a scheduled basis from various systems, and my dashboards are ready."

"We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions."

"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

"The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning."

More Jedox pros

"The new QPR Suite 2014 including QPR EnterpriseArchitect, QPR ProcessDesigner, QPR Metrics and QPR ProcessAnalyzer delivers the right capabilities for business management and enterprise architects to support operational development and business transformation cases."

"The product has so many features, but it has some unique ones that most of the similar products do not have."

"The process mapping module is highly user friendly and allows users to quickly build processes with thorough details that can be converted into comprehensive end-to-end SOPs."

Cons

"Visualization is something they need to improve. There should be some dropdown facilities in it like Excel."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."

"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

"There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

"The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it."

More Jedox cons

"Mobile features need to be improved."

"There should be an easier way of reporting, or producing, reports in MS Office."

"The QPR content management module is highly complex and difficult to use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"Excellent value for money."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Comparisons

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs Jedox

Compared 5% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Infor dEPM vs QPR Metrics

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle HFM vs QPR Metrics

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs QPR Metrics

Compared 7% of the time

Workday Adaptive Planning vs QPR Metrics

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs QPR Metrics

Compared 4% of the time

More QPR Metrics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

September 2026

Download Jedox product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Performance Management

August 2026

Download QPR Metrics product report

Also Known As

Jedox EPM

QPR Suite, QPR Software QPR Suite

Overview

Jedox offers flexibility and customization for corporate performance management, focusing on financial consolidation, planning, budgeting, and forecasting. Its Excel and Power BI integrations and strong API connections enhance integration capabilities.

Jedox provides a user-friendly interface for comprehensive planning, allowing companies to create different cubes, facilitating intuitive dashboards, dynamic reporting, and advanced analytical features. Its powerful ETL functionality improves integration with diverse systems, making data entry and customizable reporting efficient. Although requiring implementation and maintenance efforts, Jedox proves effective in management reporting, financial analysis, and data transfer processes. However, visualization options, UI, scalability, and pricing structure could improve.

What are the key features of Jedox?

Flexibility and Customization: Adaptable planning with customizable cubes.
Excel Integration: Seamless integration for ease of use.
ETL Functionality: Enhanced data integration capabilities.
Intuitive Dashboard: User-friendly interface with dynamic reporting.
Power BI and API Connections: Strong integration with business tools.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Planning: Streamlined financial consolidation and budgeting processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Improved management reporting for stakeholders.
Data Integration: Effective data transfer capabilities within systems.
Scalability: Custom solutions for growing enterprise needs.

Companies in industries like hospitality use Jedox for tailored planning solutions such as room and meal planning. Organizations employ Jedox for creating ERP solutions, HR dashboards, and cost center reporting, utilizing it for financial analysis and integration needs.

Jedox

QPR Metrics provides advanced features for effective performance management, catering to businesses looking for comprehensive data analysis and reporting capabilities. Its intuitive framework supports strategic alignment and operational transparency.

QPR Metrics is designed to enhance decision-making through robust data integration and visualization. By facilitating goal setting and tracking, it ensures that key performance indicators (KPIs) are easily managed and interpreted. Businesses benefit from its streamlined approach to aligning operational goals with strategic objectives, ensuring that data-driven insights are at the forefront of business planning and execution.

What are the most valuable features of QPR Metrics?

Data Integration: Seamlessly connect and analyze data across different business systems.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor dashboards to specific needs for actionable insights.
Real-Time Reporting: Access up-to-date information that supports proactive decision-making.
KPI Tracking: Monitor and evaluate KPIs to stay aligned with strategic goals.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when reviewing QPR Metrics?

Improved Decision-Making: Empower users with real-time data insights to make informed decisions.
Operational Efficiency: Streamline processes for enhanced productivity and goal achievement.
Strategic Alignment: Maintain a clear focus on business objectives with aligned KPIs.
Risk Mitigation: Reduce potential business risks with predictive analytics.

QPR Metrics is widely implemented in industries such as manufacturing, finance, and healthcare, where it supports performance improvement through real-time data and strategic alignment. In manufacturing, it enhances efficiency by analyzing production metrics. Financial institutions benefit from its ability to track and forecast critical financial metrics, while healthcare providers use it to monitor patient care standards and hospital performance.

QPR Software

Sample Customers

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

Eneco Group, Aalto University

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. QPR Metrics

September 2026

Free Report: Jedox vs. QPR Metrics

Find out what your peers are saying about Jedox vs. QPR Metrics and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jedox vs. QPR Metrics report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.