Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Jedox Logo

Top 10 Jedox Alternatives

Vendor: Jedox
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Jedox Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Jedox based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Domo, Anaplan, and IBM Planning Analytics. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Jedox Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Jedox, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Jedox Logo
Domo
3.9 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Domo
3.9 out of 5
Domo offers extensive integrations and easy setup for diverse teams, focusing on rapid visualization and efficient ETL functions. In comparison, Jedox provides dynamic analytics with highly customizable reports, suitable for complex environments needing detailed insights and integration across platforms like Salesforce.
Download Domo vs. Jedox Report
Domo offers a higher setup cost for businesses implementing their solutions, while Jedox presents a more budget-friendly alternative for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Domo offers a higher setup cost for businesses implementing their solutions, while Jedox presents a more budget-friendly alternative for initial implementation.
Jedox Logo
Anaplan
4.1 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Anaplan
4.1 out of 5
Anaplan excels in comprehensive functionality with adaptable features for complex forecasting, making it suitable for enterprise needs. In comparison, Jedox appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its intuitive Excel-like interface, flexible pricing, and seamless integration options, making it ideal for dynamic reporting.
Download Anaplan vs. Jedox Report
Anaplan has a high setup cost compared to Jedox, which offers a more affordable initial investment. This cost difference makes Jedox an attractive option for businesses seeking a cost-effective solution for their financial planning needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Anaplan has a high setup cost compared to Jedox, which offers a more affordable initial investment. This cost difference makes Jedox an attractive option for businesses seeking a cost-effective solution for their financial planning needs.
Jedox Logo
Jedox Logo
IBM Planning Analytics
4.2 out of 5
IBM Planning Analytics excels in integration and complex data analytics. In comparison, Jedox appeals with its robust budgeting and forecasting features, offering intuitive reporting. A tech buyer might choose IBM for analytics depth, while opting for Jedox for user-friendly planning capabilities.
Download IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox Report
IBM Planning Analytics has a higher setup cost, while Jedox offers a more cost-efficient setup, highlighting a significant price difference.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Planning Analytics has a higher setup cost, while Jedox offers a more cost-efficient setup, highlighting a significant price difference.
Jedox Logo
Oracle Hyperion
3.9 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Oracle Hyperion
3.9 out of 5
Oracle Hyperion offers scalability and advanced calculation functions, suitable for large-scale planning. In comparison, Jedox enables dynamic reporting with Excel integration, ideal for agile data visualization and ease of use. Oracle Hyperion's infrastructure complexity contrasts with Jedox's adaptable deployment options.
Download Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion Report
Oracle Hyperion involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas Jedox offers a lower setup fee. The considerable difference in setup costs might influence companies to opt for Jedox for budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Hyperion involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas Jedox offers a lower setup fee. The considerable difference in setup costs might influence companies to opt for Jedox for budget-friendly implementation.
Jedox Logo
Workiva Wdesk
3.5 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Workiva Wdesk
3.5 out of 5
Workiva Wdesk offers superior integration and compliance management, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing streamlined financial reporting. In comparison, Jedox is favored for its advanced analytics and flexible deployment options, appealing to businesses seeking comprehensive data analysis and adaptable implementation strategies.
Download Jedox vs. Workiva Wdesk Report
Workiva Wdesk involves substantial setup costs, whereas Jedox offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Workiva Wdesk involves substantial setup costs, whereas Jedox offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Jedox Logo
Board
4.3 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Board
4.3 out of 5
Board attracts with intuitive interfaces and quicker deployment, ideal for rapid implementation and scalability. In comparison, Jedox's advanced functionality and flexible customization cater to complex data needs, offering substantial long-term ROI for organizations demanding integrated planning and robust predictive analytics.
Download Board vs. Jedox Report
Board has a higher setup cost, while Jedox offers a more affordable initial investment. This highlights the cost differences between the solutions, with Board being the pricier option compared to Jedox's cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Board has a higher setup cost, while Jedox offers a more affordable initial investment. This highlights the cost differences between the solutions, with Board being the pricier option compared to Jedox's cost-effective setup.
Jedox Logo
Adaptive Insights
4.2 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Adaptive Insights
4.2 out of 5
Adaptive Insights offers user-friendly functionalities and seamless integration for straightforward financial planning. In comparison, Jedox provides powerful customization and advanced analytics, making it suitable for enterprises prioritizing tailored solutions. Adaptive Insights delivers quick deployment, while Jedox appeals with versatility and comprehensive customer resources.
Download Adaptive Insights vs. Jedox Report
Adaptive Insights typically incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Jedox, which offers a more budget-friendly option in terms of setup expenses. This difference highlights a key consideration for budget-conscious users evaluating these financial planning solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Adaptive Insights typically incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Jedox, which offers a more budget-friendly option in terms of setup expenses. This difference highlights a key consideration for budget-conscious users evaluating these financial planning solutions.
Jedox Logo
CCH Tagetik
3.9 out of 5
Jedox Logo
CCH Tagetik
3.9 out of 5
Jedox offers intuitive design and quick cloud deployment, appealing to businesses seeking affordability and fast ROI. In comparison, CCH Tagetik provides comprehensive financial features, robust deployment options, and strategic value for organizations requiring extensive functionalities and complex financial management.
Download CCH Tagetik vs. Jedox Report
Jedox offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious teams, while CCH Tagetik requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Jedox offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious teams, while CCH Tagetik requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Jedox Logo
Oracle HFM
4.0 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Oracle HFM
4.0 out of 5
Oracle HFM excels in financial consolidation and integration with Oracle ERP systems, suiting complex enterprises. In comparison, Jedox caters to flexible planning and quicker deployment, ideal for mid-sized businesses prioritizing adaptability and cost-effective financial modeling.
Download Jedox vs. Oracle HFM Report
Oracle HFM has a higher setup cost, while Jedox offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a significant financial difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle HFM has a higher setup cost, while Jedox offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a significant financial difference between the two solutions.
Jedox Logo
Jedox Logo
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud excels with robust integration and comprehensive features, ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Jedox focuses on dynamic reporting and spreadsheet compatibility, making it suitable for smaller setups valuing Excel-like interfaces. Each solution addresses different business needs effectively.
Download Jedox vs. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud Report
The solution is free.
There is an annual subscription for this solution and it is priced high.
View comparison
Pricing
The solution is free.
There is an annual subscription for this solution and it is priced high.
Jedox Logo
OneStream XF
4.7 out of 5
Jedox Logo
OneStream XF
4.7 out of 5
Jedox attracts tech buyers with its competitive pricing, excellent Excel integration, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, OneStream XF, favored for its comprehensive features and superior financial data quality, requires a higher investment but supports complex environments with exceptional customer service.
Download Jedox vs. OneStream XF Report
Jedox offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while OneStream XF presents a higher upfront investment, potentially aligning with complex integration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Jedox offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while OneStream XF presents a higher upfront investment, potentially aligning with complex integration needs.
Jedox Logo
Planful
4.0 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Planful
4.0 out of 5
Planful is recognized for user-friendly dashboards and accurate forecasting, ideal for budget-sensitive businesses. In comparison, Jedox excels in flexible modeling and customization, making it suitable for complex data environments. Planful offers competitive pricing, whereas Jedox provides higher long-term ROI with advanced integrations.
Download Jedox vs. Planful Report
Planful offers setup cost transparency suitable for organizations seeking detailed initial cost visibility, while Jedox is known for competitive setup costs yet lacks the immediate breakdown clarity, making Planful stand out for those valuing upfront cost transparency.
View comparison
Pricing
Planful offers setup cost transparency suitable for organizations seeking detailed initial cost visibility, while Jedox is known for competitive setup costs yet lacks the immediate breakdown clarity, making Planful stand out for those valuing upfront cost transparency.
Jedox Logo
Infor dEPM
3.8 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Infor dEPM
3.8 out of 5
Infor dEPM excels in delivering robust analytics, catering to businesses needing deep financial insights. In comparison, Jedox shines with comprehensive planning and budgeting tools, attracting those prioritizing strategic planning capabilities. Each offers distinct deployment options, with Jedox emphasizing flexibility for diverse needs.
Download Infor dEPM vs. Jedox Report
Infor dEPM has a moderate setup cost, while Jedox offers a higher initial investment requirement.
View comparison
Pricing
Infor dEPM has a moderate setup cost, while Jedox offers a higher initial investment requirement.
Jedox Logo
Vena
1 out of 5
Jedox Logo
Vena
1 out of 5

Vena is enterprise class software for budgeting, planning and forecasting with powerful reporting & analytics.

View comparison
Jedox Logo
Jedox Logo
SAS Activity-Based Management
2.5 out of 5
SAS Activity-Based Management provides extensive analytics and detailed reporting, crucial for efficient resource allocation. In comparison, Jedox offers a versatile platform with strong integration, ideal for dynamic environments. SAS requires traditional deployment, while Jedox's cloud-based approach ensures quick integration and adaptability.
Download Jedox vs. SAS Activity-Based Management Report
SAS Activity-Based Management typically incurs higher setup costs, whereas Jedox offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference in implementation expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Activity-Based Management typically incurs higher setup costs, whereas Jedox offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference in implementation expenses between the two solutions.
Jedox Logo
QPR Metrics
4.3 out of 5
Jedox Logo
QPR Metrics
4.3 out of 5
QPR Metrics excels in strategic alignment with competitive pricing. In comparison, Jedox offers advanced analytics and modelling, appealing to those needing dynamic forecasting. While QPR provides straightforward deployment, Jedox justifies its higher cost through extensive functionality and robust support.
Download Jedox vs. QPR Metrics Report
QPR Metrics offers a cost-effective setup compared to Jedox, which demands a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
QPR Metrics offers a cost-effective setup compared to Jedox, which demands a higher initial investment.
Jedox Logo
UNIT4 prevero
1 out of 5
Jedox Logo
UNIT4 prevero
1 out of 5
With statutory reporting requirements changing constantly, Unit4 prevero enables you to effectively ensure compliance, allowing you to make decisions with confidence.
View comparison
Jedox Logo
Jedox Logo
SAP Digital Boardroom
1 out of 5

SAP Digital Boardroom gives top decision makers a real-time, digital-enterprise experience. It integrates with line­-of­-business data from SAP and third-party applications to provide a single source of truth for your most important business metrics. With SAP Digital Boardroom, key decision makers can more readily monitor, simulate, and support business change to meet the expectations of your customers, business partners, and employees more effectively.

View comparison

Related categories

Business Performance Management
Data Integration
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools