IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox comparison

IBM and Jedox are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Jedox is ranked #12. IBM holds a 4.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to Jedox’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jedox users who would recommend it.

IBM Planning Analytics

Read 26 IBM Planning Analytics reviews

2,959 Views
1,213 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

1,654 Views
860 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Planning Analytics

Jedox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Planning Analytics and Jedox are leading analytics platforms competing in the business planning sector. IBM Planning Analytics holds an advantage in data integration and scalability, whereas Jedox excels with user-friendly customization options.

Features: IBM Planning Analytics offers advanced forecasting and predictive analytics, a unified database for streamlined planning, and a sandboxing feature for in-depth analysis. Jedox provides flexible modeling, dynamic and intuitive report creation, and seamless cross-platform integration for comprehensive business planning.

Room for Improvement: IBM Planning Analytics could enhance user interface design and reduce complexity in its deployment processes. Improving mobile functionality can also be beneficial. Jedox could benefit from enhanced scalability options, improved support for large datasets, and a more refined interface for complex planning scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Planning Analytics offers robust support but has a complex deployment model that requires guidance. Jedox provides a smoother deployment experience with a strong service approach, ensuring faster implementation and easy adjustments.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Planning Analytics involves a higher setup cost but offers strong ROI for large enterprises with complex needs. Jedox presents a cost-effective setup appealing to businesses seeking quicker returns through agile planning and efficient resource allocation.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 4.9%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jedox is 4.1%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Planning Analytics	4.9%
Jedox	4.1%
Other	91.0%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Bhavna Aarna

Senior Software Engineer at J.P Morgan

Planning has become faster and financial teams collaborate seamlessly on annual budgets

The planning efficiency with IBM Planning Analytics is very quick, and data processing can be done efficiently. I also appreciate that it is an AI-based tool for our business, which software mainly focuses on business planning and future forecasting. The best features of IBM Planning Analytics include that the software helps us in doing budget planning. Some of the valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics are its intuitive and user-friendly interface, reporting output and scheduling, access control and security, and mobile capabilities. IBM Planning Analytics has positively impacted my organization as we have noticed specific improvements since we started using it. We are able to forecast the budget for the entire year with significant time savings. All the complex data is easily processed, and with Excel add functionality, it is easier to have all the data in one place, which can be read by pivot or data visualization. The data protection protocols are well set up. Planning efficiency is very good as we can seamlessly plan and work on all budgets on time. By using IBM Planning Analytics, we have been able to automate manual processes, where we have saved time, especially through automating dashboards. It has also increased the activity of the planning team and provided us with ad hoc reporting capabilities.

Read full review

Riyaz Halani

Financial Controller at Zalando SE

Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance

I would rate the scalability of Jedox a seven out of ten. There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself. So that's where the main improvements lie—making it easy for people to not depend on just technical finance teams. There are almost 50 to 60 users using Jedox in our organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a very stable, robust product."

"The most valuable feature is that it is able to slice and dice the data."

"A lot of the platform is in-memory, so Planning Analytics can run calculations quite fast. It also offers several user interfaces. And in the newest version of Planning Analytics, there is a new one called the Planning Analytics Workspace. Maybe it could be useful for the business side."

"The scenario modeling capabilities are frequently used to create different scenarios, compare them, and see which action leads to which result."

"The product's stability is good."

"Navigating through the data to make analysis is really quick."

"This level of stability is crucial for a product like Cognos TM1, as using an unstable platform would result in loss of time."

"The flexibility of IBM Planning Analytics is a great feature of this solution. The design flexibility with data rules and defining calculations The ability to combine online and offline calculations are a benefit. Additionally, the forecasting features and predictive analytics is very good."

More IBM Planning Analytics pros

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

"The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning."

"The EPM is the most valuable feature."

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."

"The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features."

More Jedox pros

Cons

"The local authentication part is difficult to manage in the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The tool's transport layer could be improved when promoting development between environments."

"IBM Planning Analytics could be improved by simplifying the learning curve, as it requires a lot of time to learn and master it."

"Adding predefined templates could be beneficial."

"The new frontend Planning Analytics Workspace is not very good, it could be improved. I like the Planning Analytics functionality but it would be helpful if it could be more customizable. You can create a prediction and receive information but you cannot do feature engineering regarding the predictive models. If this was added it would be helpful."

"If we talk only about the TM1 engine, it's quite rich and possibly too rich, making it complex to perform simple tasks."

"The workspace API should be improved and documented so we know better which objects are used."

"Extracting data is a little slow."

More IBM Planning Analytics cons

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"There is not much training for Jedox."

"The solution needs to improve its support. The visualization in Microsoft BI is more modern and comfortable than Jedox's. I would expect something similar with the solution."

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

"I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement."

"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."

"The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it."

More Jedox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."

"IBM Planning Analytics is not the cheapest solution, but it's priced per the market standard for this type of solution. I rate the price at seven out of ten."

"Compared with the other tools in the market, IBM Planning Analytics is a bit expensive."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."

"IBM Planning Analytics is priced well, and licensing costs are yearly."

"The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten since it's expensive."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"Excellent value for money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?

The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?

While IBM's solutions were costly before, the introduction of SaaS models has reduced prices significantly. Comparatively, IBM rates may be better than those of competitors, such as Hyperion ( /pro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?

IBM is behind competitors like Tableau ( /products/tableau-reviews ) and Power BI in terms of visualization. Their visuals are less innovative and practical with fewer varieties. IBM's visualizatio...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Analytics Cloud vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

Anaplan vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Cognos vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

Databricks vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Planning Analytics Competitors

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 17% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Jedox

Compared 6% of the time

OneStream XF vs Jedox

Compared 4% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics

January 2026

Download IBM Planning Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

January 2026

Download Jedox product report

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1

Jedox EPM

Overview

IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

IBM

Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

Jedox

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Planning Analytics vs. Jedox report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.