Jedox vs Oracle Hyperion comparison

Jedox and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Jedox is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0, while Oracle is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Jedox holds a 5.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 9.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jedox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

1,623 Views
763 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Read 58 Oracle Hyperion reviews

3,253 Views
2,049 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Jedox

Oracle Hyperion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle Hyperion and Jedox are powerful solutions competing in enterprise performance management. Oracle Hyperion holds a competitive edge with its scalability and robust planning capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive financial processes. Jedox, however, is favored for its flexibility, offering agile reporting solutions.

Features: Oracle Hyperion is known for its robust calculation engine, extensive ERP integration, and scalability, supporting large budget cycles. Jedox provides intuitive dashboarding, easy data integration from various sources, and dynamic reporting, suitable for organizations seeking interactive solutions.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Hyperion needs to enhance its documentation, support responsiveness, and address performance issues with large datasets. Jedox could improve its front-end design, modernize its user interface, and refine its technical support framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Hyperion offers on-premises and hybrid cloud options, providing flexibility but facing criticism for inconsistent technical support. Jedox presents public cloud deployment but also has reported issues with support consistency. Customer service for both indicates room for improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Hyperion is a premium choice, suited for large enterprises justifying the cost with extensive feature use, offering significant ROI through efficiency gains. Jedox is more cost-effective, appealing to smaller businesses with scalable needs, and offers flexible licensing for better accessibility and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Jedox is 5.3%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 9.8%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Riyaz Halani

Financial Controller at Zalando SE

Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance

I would rate the scalability of Jedox a seven out of ten. There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself. So that's where the main improvements lie—making it easy for people to not depend on just technical finance teams. There are almost 50 to 60 users using Jedox in our organization.

Read full review

Pranit Chhajed

Consultant at Infosys

Automation of financial processes streamlines operations but pricing needs improvement

Our clients mostly use Hyperion for their financial requirements, including budgeting, forecasting, and planning The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel. The workflow management of planning and the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions."

"The EPM is the most valuable feature."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

"The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features."

"The solution is very versatile."

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

"The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning."

"The data entry point is most valuable. The way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."

More Jedox pros

"The roll-up potential of the product is very good, meaning we have detailed information and we want it to be summarized, based on geography, based on different product lines, or based on different charts of accounts in the general ledger. It rolls up the information in a very concise way. This makes it easy to understand the overall performance, for it's forecasting aspects, or quarterly reporting, year to year, or month to month reporting."

"The stability is fine and quite user friendly."

"It's very easy to use and the functionality is quite complete."

"The most valuable features are those associated with modules and SP, IT in this space, planning, HFM, and PME."

"The scalability is good."

"The tool is very scalable and powerful. It helps us with financial reporting and performance reporting. It is a very good tool for consolidation and budgeting. We are dependent on it for reporting."

"Functionality-wise, it is what they say it is. It is the best in class, but it all ties back to your users. If your users are completely enamored with Excel spreadsheets, then breaking those habits is hard."

"Oracle Hyperion is fairly user-friendly and not too complicated. The forecasting, it's really good. It's sometimes slow when there are a lot of users using it and we can have up to approximately 300 users using it. However, you can do it in Excel because there's an Excel add-in. This is a benefit because a lot of people do this way instead of having to go into the planning application itself."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

Cons

"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."

"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

"There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

"The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it."

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement."

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

More Jedox cons

"The level of complexity of the implementation is always a challenge."

"I have not seen return on investment from using Oracle Hyperion."

"The initial setup of Oracle Hyperion is very difficult."

"There can be an improvement in many regards with the dimensions, the metadata, the interfaces, as well as the integration."

"All the planning systems out there are great. It doesn't matter which company you use. They're all great. I've seen demonstrations on a number of them, but it all boils down to the culture within the organization itself to use that functionality, understand it, and help drive it. I've had Oracle salespeople do demonstrations, and it looked really good. We get it on board, and everybody still sticks to their Excel spreadsheets because companies are a lot more complex than what you could deliver on the planning system. So, there should be more education on the capabilities, and there should be more understanding of organizations in terms of the way they access the data in order to plan."

"It is challenging to do reporting on Oracle Hyperion if you're not an expert."

"Hyperion has much room for improvement, especially disaster recovery. You don't have the option to choose the proper disaster recovery method. We have Hyperion and an SQL server on the backend. We have active solutions for the backend database server, which aren't working for our people. They've asked us to remove the high availability to increase application performance."

"Improvements are needed in the tool's performance."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"Excellent value for money."

"The licensing cost for the on-premises version of the solution is too high."

"We pay for licensing yearly."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"The licenses cost approximately $1,000."

"Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."

"Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."

"The solution is affordable."

"Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jedox?

The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jedox?

There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. Th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jedox?

We use the solution on the cloud, and Jedox hosts it. I'm the admin at my company, and we do corporate planning and management, including all the budgeting and forecasting. We also do a lot of repo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

We are going to re-implement the Oracle Hyperion system due to changes in our chart of account process and some other factors. We were analyzing whether to move to a cloud system, EPM Cloud. We hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

We are using Oracle Financials and Oracle Hyperion. Oracle Hyperion is used for budget and MIS reporting, while Financials is used for financial accounting, payables, receivables, and general ledge...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 28% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 13% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Jedox

Compared 9% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 8% of the time

Planful vs Jedox

Compared 4% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 15% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 9% of the time

OneStream XF vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

August 2025

Download Jedox product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

August 2025

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Also Known As

Jedox EPM

Hyperion

Overview

Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

Jedox

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

Sample Customers

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

July 2025

Free Report: Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

Find out what your peers are saying about Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.