

JFrog Xray and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management compete in the vulnerability management solutions category. Users often favor Microsoft Defender for its expansive features and integration, while JFrog Xray is acknowledged for superior customer support experiences.
Features: JFrog Xray features deep integration with DevOps tools, enabling efficient scanning of container images and binary repositories. It offers comprehensive license compliance and security risk management. In contrast, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides expansive threat insights and tight integration within Microsoft's suite, facilitating proactive vulnerability management and broad threat intelligence.
Room for Improvement: JFrog Xray could improve by streamlining its initial setup process and enhancing automation capabilities to reduce manual configuration. Better documentation and a more intuitive user interface could also enhance user experience. Microsoft Defender's areas of improvement include reducing its higher cost, offering more non-Microsoft tool integrations, and simplifying licensing structures for clearer value propositions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management benefits from seamless integration with Microsoft products, allowing faster deployment and regular updates. It is praised for consistent customer service. JFrog Xray, while potentially challenging in its complex setup, is well supported by a dedicated support team, which often leads to positive customer service experiences.
Pricing and ROI: JFrog Xray provides competitive setup costs with flexible pricing tiers suitable for various enterprise sizes, generally leading to a satisfactory return on investment based on its robust features. Microsoft Defender's pricing is relatively higher, aligning with its expansive capabilities and integration advantages. Businesses utilizing Microsoft products often find its ROI favorable due to its integrated security approach.
Organizations typically do not rely solely on Microsoft products to avoid putting all eggs in one basket, which presents a challenge for maximizing ROI.
As a Microsoft partner, we receive significant discounts, making the solution affordable for us.
When we need clarifications, we contact our account manager, and they arrange demos.
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate the technical support of JFrog Xray an eight because they are very knowledgeable.
They are sometimes responsive, however, often issues cannot be reproduced on their end, making it challenging.
The support we receive from Microsoft is declining, and for example, after taking advanced support, we have not received satisfactory answers.
They are familiar with Microsoft products but are not direct Microsoft staff, which is an area needing improvement.
According to my use case, it is highly scalable.
The integration is straightforward for those who understand it, though documentation needs improvement.
It is scalable; I evaluated the product and decided to use Defender on over 700 of our company servers.
I use JFrog Xray primarily for security purposes, and I find it reliable.
We did experience crashes, downtimes, and performance issues with JFrog Xray.
There are compatibility issues occasionally arising with false positives when other security tools are not whitelisted in Microsoft Defender.
It is very resource-intensive, consuming a lot of memory and CPU.
If Microsoft experiences downtime, this solution goes down as it is a SaaS-based solution where we have no control.
When we have given a very long tag, it doesn't work as expected and requires excessive scrolling.
somehow you need to adapt your GitLab pipeline and turn them into JFrog pipeline, and this is something they don't really advertise at first—you're obliged to use the JFrog CLI.
X-ray needs improvement in supporting more than one database, as it currently only supports PostgreSQL.
This scoring should be for specific industries as well. If I belong to the healthcare industry using Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, it should provide me with a risk score and show how I fare against the risk score of my industry.
A vulnerability I patch within 15 minutes takes 24 additional hours for an update.
The product is not stable; it often uses excessive memory and CPU, which makes it slow.
JFrog Xray provides a free trial of 14 days.
The basic scanning capabilities come with Artifactory, however, curation requires additional licenses.
Overall, every organization wishes for cheaper options, but we look at the security side as well, so we are good for now.
For non-partners, however, the cost could be seen as higher, between seven to ten.
The pricing is reasonable, and it's included in the whole Microsoft E5 bundle, so it's all-inclusive.
The most valuable features of JFrog Xray are its curation capabilities, its native integration with Artifactory, scanning for vulnerabilities, and license compliance features.
The policy-driven approach of JFrog Xray helped me maintain security standards by integrating it in the development pipeline.
With other registries such as ECR, we can use the images only in the AWS cloud. With JFrog, we can use this registry from any cloud or work locally as well.
The main advantage of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is that it can locate and prevent most threats even when the endpoints are not connected to the corporate network, as long as the internet is available.
The feature for customizing to region-specific and domain-specific requirements in healthcare is particularly beneficial.
The most valuable aspect is the kind of assessment results I get, and the recommendations provided in Microsoft products really help in taking care of the resources.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | 2.3% |
| JFrog Xray | 1.4% |
| Other | 96.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
JFrog is on a mission to enable continuous updates through Liquid Software, empowering developers to code high-quality applications that securely flow to end-users with zero downtime. The world’s top brands such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Uber, VMware, and Spotify are among the 4500 companies that already depend on JFrog to manage binaries for their mission-critical applications. JFrog is a privately-held, global company, and is a proud sponsor of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation [CNCF].
If you are a team player and you care and you play to WIN, we have just the job you're looking for.
As we say at JFrog: "Once You Leap Forward You Won't Go Back!"
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management enables organizations to identify vulnerabilities, manage patches, and fortify threat detection. It offers endpoint assessments, cloud incident management, and dynamic security through Microsoft's Security Scorecard integration.
Organizations leverage Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management for advanced threat detection and response. It provides robust tools for vulnerability assessment and cloud incident management, integrated with Microsoft's Security Scorecard to enhance dynamic security profiling. Key features include automatic patch deployment, security configuration management, and seamless integration with Microsoft platforms, benefiting both on-prem and cloud environments. Organizations can track vulnerabilities with severity-based reports, helping manage outdated software and minimizing threat exposure.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?In healthcare, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management helps manage compliance with health regulations, while in finance, it aids in securing sensitive data from cyber threats. Manufacturing sectors benefit from its patch management, keeping operational technology systems less vulnerable to disruptions.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.