No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

JIRA Portfolio vs Polarion ALM comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Portfolio
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Polarion ALM
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of JIRA Portfolio is 1.9%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 4.2%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Polarion ALM4.2%
JIRA Portfolio1.9%
Other93.9%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Neeraj Chaudhari - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivery Leader : Digital Productivity Studio at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Aligns with agile frameworks for streamlined project management
User experience should be more intuitive. Currently, it's not that intuitive. Additionally, a lot of querying and customization is needed for reporting. If there could be some templates out of the box, it would be helpful. Making the report creation process faster and easier with drag-and-drop features would be beneficial.
LasseMikkonen - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at byte
Has provided mature traceability and configuration features while supporting complex product development for mid-to-large companies
Polarion ALM can learn from Atlassian tools a lot, as the usability is not the best, and it is really narrowly focused on requirements management only. For example, if you want to do testing and test result management with it, it is very limited. Jama Connect has similar limitations, and both should really focus on developing the integrations and extendability. For example, Jama Connect does not even have an extension marketplace, whereas Polarion has a small one. However, compared to the Atlassian Marketplace where you can get whatever applications for whatever price, it is a totally different ballgame. I would highly recommend Polarion ALM add more AI features to it. I know they have started to do something, but for example, I have been developing widgets for IBM DOORS Next, AI widgets, so that you can write and analyze requirements with the AI, and I have also done the same for Jira, creating a couple of Jira applications in the marketplace as well.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has improved our organization by allowing us to create our own customization, track the live status of all the flows on one page, get a single view of our progress, and have a quality overview."
"The workflow and bucket features are most helpful."
"The way to manage cards as a KANBAN, is really easy but when you need to track hundreds of projects, you need to be very clear in which way the things must be completed."
"The most valuable features of the JIRA Portfolio are the ease of use, many developers are familiar with it."
"Version management is the most valuable feature of JIRA Portfolio."
"The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use."
"The stability of JIRA Portfolio is very good."
"Jira Portfolio is highly scalable; you can manage user connectivity and add more licenses within the tool, and it's very simple and easy."
"There are similar solutions out there such as Jira and Confluence, but they are not as good."
"It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins."
"It is a very stable solution."
"I am impressed with the solution’s stability."
"Even though Polarion is quite expensive, it's quite a good solution for medical device development in general, especially for software development."
"This one tool incorporates almost all engineering tasks we need to do for one project."
"The most valuable feature is the function of the ALM system."
"Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."
 

Cons

"When I want to embed Jira Portfolio in a complete HLI cycle, I'm missing things to evaluate my ethic into my value stream."
"The interface JIRA Portfolio could improve."
"With Jira, an issue that arises is the length of time it takes to show certain data."
"The initial setup was complex."
"The tool is very open, which leads to a lot of error, confusion, and end problems."
"The integration capabilities of JIRA Portfolio could be enhanced."
"This solution is not able to be integrated with other solutions because you have to upgrade it and pay for more licensing."
"An improvement would be if Portfolio were integrated with Office 365."
"As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming."
"The system’s technology is not the most current, leading to missing features that are common in web-based applications."
"The solution's editing capabilities need improvement."
"The planning and task management aspects of the solution were not that easy."
"Nowadays, the dashboard is too complex to be created."
"We use PTC Windchill, and Polarion ALM doesn't have native integration, so we had to purchase the connector to integrate it with Polarion ALM. We still haven't implemented it."
"The solution is not easy to use. The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy."
"The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy. A person needs a lot of programming knowledge in order to successfully handle the job."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Given the solution’s significant functionality, benefits, and value, you get more than you pay for."
"I use the free version for personal use."
"I rate JIRA Portfolio a five out of ten for its pricing."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."
"We pay our fees annually, although monthly payments are also available."
"The pricing of the solution is expensive."
"This solution has a comparable pricing in comparison to other similar products on the market."
"I do not believe that the product provides value for money since I feel that it is quite expensive."
"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."
"It is an expensive product."
"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."
"Software for medical devices is always expensive."
"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."
"The solution is expensive."
"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
30%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise33
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Portfolio?
I am part of the delivery team and am not exposed to the commercial information. However, from what I understand, JIRA is competitively priced. It is not considered expensive in the market.
What needs improvement with JIRA Portfolio?
The setup process for JIRA Portfolio is complex.
What is your primary use case for JIRA Portfolio?
We are using all the tools of Google, but not as a collaboration. We are using JIRA Portfolio for making the process of authorization in this process, for change control, and for software delivery....
What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?
Polarion ALM can learn from Atlassian tools a lot, as the usability is not the best, and it is really narrowly focused on requirements management only. For example, if you want to do testing and te...
What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?
We are in our product development using Polarion ALM's functionalities. I am a power user, partly responsible for configuring the tool. We are using it for many things. The idea was to go for a req...
What advice do you have for others considering Polarion ALM?
The pricing of Polarion ALM and IBM ELM is pretty much aligned. They are not at the same level, but I would say aligned according to the capabilities of the tools, with DOORS being more expensive b...
 

Also Known As

Portfolio for JIRA
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. Morgan
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
Find out what your peers are saying about JIRA Portfolio vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.