No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

LoginRadius vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Implementing LoginRadius improved user engagement, simplified integration, enhanced security, increased conversions, and provided cost-effective, scalable solutions for businesses.
Sentiment score
3.6
Ping Identity Platform simplifies identity management, lowers IT overhead, enhances security, improves efficiency, boosts satisfaction, and offers scalability.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
Users praise LoginRadius for responsive, knowledgeable support, clear communication, extensive resources, and frequent updates ensuring transparency.
Sentiment score
6.1
Ping Identity Platform's support is praised for rapid P1 responses but critiqued for slow non-critical responses and portal confusion.
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
The problem with the support team is that I do not like support; the day of the threat image, they never come on the call and unless it is a priority, they never come to call to defend it and to provide any kind of solutions.
Iam Consultant at itcinfotech
I have contacted the support team of Ping Identity Platform for help before, and my experience with them varies depending on the situation at hand.
Founder at APSSIAM
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
LoginRadius is praised for scalability, performance, and support, despite initial setup challenges, making it suitable for growing businesses.
Sentiment score
7.3
Ping Identity Platform excels in scalability, efficiently managing large user bases and high traffic with minimal disruptions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
LoginRadius is praised for its stability, reliability, efficient high traffic handling, minimal downtime, scalability, and secure operations.
Sentiment score
7.9
Ping Identity Platform is reliable with minimal downtime; users value its stability despite occasional integration and security update challenges.
Ping Identity Platform demonstrates strong stability, as it is not prone to bugs.
Founder at APSSIAM
Overall, I see PingFederate as a stable product.
Iam Consultant at itcinfotech
In terms of stability for Ping Identity Platform, we haven't faced any issues till now.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
 

Room For Improvement

LoginRadius users seek improvements in support response times, API documentation, customization, dashboard usability, integration capabilities, and pricing transparency.
Ping Identity Platform struggles with complexity, costs, limited legacy integration, and requires UI, troubleshooting, and integration improvements.
There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
In Ping Identity Platform, it requires checking Active Directory for user issues, which can pose challenges, especially since SSO teams often do not have complete access to user data.
Founder at APSSIAM
The most significant area I would recommend is that things such as redirects still do not have majority of the application direct integration, such as Oracle ERP.
Iam Consultant at itcinfotech
 

Setup Cost

<p>LoginRadius provides scalable pricing that varies by user count and features, with flexibility and potential cost increases for added functionalities.</p>
Ping Identity Platform offers cost-effective pricing appealing to large enterprises, with pricing starting at $20,000 annually.
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
 

Valuable Features

LoginRadius is praised for its security, single sign-on, integration, performance, customizability, support, easy implementation, scalability, and reliability.
Ping Identity Platform offers robust features like MFA, RBAC, and API security, boasting ease of use and extensive integration.
Ping Identity Platform can be accessed both on-premises and in the cloud, allowing for high flexibility in creating user flows and policies tailored to client requirements.
Founder at APSSIAM
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
They provide out-of-box almost all the MFA options, including email OTP, text-based OTP, TOTP, HOTP, biometric, and passwordless.
VP Engineering at Inspirit Vision
 

Categories and Ranking

LoginRadius
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
30th
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
16th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Social Login (1st)
Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
6th
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (11th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (6th), Directory Servers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of LoginRadius is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 4.7%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform4.7%
LoginRadius1.2%
Other94.1%
Single Sign-On (SSO)
 

Featured Reviews

SD
Senior Product Development Manager at Golden Dawn at Golden Dawn
Performs very well and enables us to track our customer details in a better way
The primary use was that we had implemented the identity management into our organizations which was necessary to handle our internal work, and also for our customer portal for a secure login process Has definitely improved our organization. After the implementation, we were able to track our…
AmitRathod - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
Single sign-on has simplified access while adaptive authentication protects complex user journeys
Regarding areas for improvement in Ping Identity Platform, there is not much. In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation. It provides greater feasibility, but it takes a very long time in terms of complete building. There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems. Additionally, issue troubleshooting can be difficult at times. Sometimes issues can be difficult to diagnose and require extensive technical expertise. There is also a very steep learning curve for administrative purposes and potential difficulties with offline authentication scenarios.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingFederate?
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with PingAccess?
The areas where I think PingFederate needs room for improvement include that the most significant area I would recommend is that things such as redirects still do not have majority of the applicati...
What is your primary use case for PingAccess?
The main use case for PingFederate is that we are maintaining the centralized single sign-on with DuroSengel and Carabras as the two main instances to review. If any application is hosted outside o...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rede Gazeta, BroadcastMed, Zero Waste Scotland, Pelmorex Media, Express and Star, Mapegy, IFMA, 0Radiopolis, Aurora WDC, OneName Global, IOMX.
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Find out what your peers are saying about LoginRadius vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.