Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Loom Business - Enterprise vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Loom Business - Enterprise
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
20th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
169
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Loom Business - Enterprise is 1.5%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 14.4%, down from 14.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Gerald Chioke - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy-to-deploy solution that allows users to record videos seamlessly for presentation and collaboration
I use Loom to record my screen for issues and bugs. I can also record my voice The product has helped me to present the recording of my work. I can easily record my screen and show what I did. It is like a walk-through of the work I do. The solution allows me to do it seamlessly. The ability to…
Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity
There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce, which is currently limited.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to scale videos is a valuable feature of the product."
"Communication is really easy to handle."
"Organizing a meeting is very simple to do."
"The solution has calendars that help us to manage work."
"All of the solution's features are useful since we use it for saving data, chatting, meeting, and all such purposes."
"The solution integrates with project management products like Jira."
"This solution is great for ad hoc video conferencing. It's so easy to start a meeting."
"You can easily integrate with other applications quite easily."
"We like that you can get a lot of users on one call without the call actually failing or losing quality. Hosts can connect, if I recall correctly, up to 90,000 people. If you need a massive company-wide meeting, you can do it."
 

Cons

"The solution must allow users to record videos for a longer time."
"The solution should fix the ease of use directly outside of the office environment. Right now, unless I'm at my office desktop, it's hard to access it."
"The main issue is that the link goes down when there are internet issues."
"Sometimes, other participants cannot see the shared screen during meetings. The tool also needs to automatically switch to devices as we change them. When I try to switch audio from speaker to Bluetooth, I have to manually do that."
"The solution needs to be more stable. I have found Zoom to be more stable than Teams."
"The user interface is slightly weak in Microsoft Teams and could be improved."
"Sometimes, I find the network quality is not very good with low bandwidth."
"Signing up for a new device for the solution is challenging."
"Lacking in more complex hierarchies for files and teams."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Microsoft Teams is priced less than other solutions, such as Bridge."
"If you have clients who do not have a computer and are joining with their phones it's an additional fee of $5.00 per user."
"The solution is affordable."
"It costs around $12 for SharePoint and Teams per user."
"Microsoft Teams comes free if you're using it in an organization."
"Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution because it's included in the Microsoft 365 suite."
"We get the solution on a corporate plan, where everything is included."
"Its pricing is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
I have no information about the cost as these are subsidized when procured by companies. Getting a home version cheaper or free would be a better option so students or college-goers can utilize the...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
I am unable to determine which features of Microsoft Teams are the most valuable because we do not have full capabilities due to our Exchange server being on-premise and OneDrive not being authoriz...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

hubspot, airtable, grubhub
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Slack, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.