Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Loom Business - Enterprise vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Loom Business - Enterprise
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
21st
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
169
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Loom Business - Enterprise is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 14.0%, up from 12.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Teams14.0%
Loom Business - Enterprise1.6%
Other84.4%
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Konjengbam  Mitindra Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Team meetings have become more productive and video transcripts support ongoing collaboration
Loom Business - Enterprise provides transcripts, which is very helpful. Moreover, whenever needed, users can come back to refer to those videos or meetings, making it very important. The best feature Loom Business - Enterprise offers is video recording. This feature stands out because of its ease of use, quality, and accessibility by anyone in the team. The transcripts from Loom Business - Enterprise are pretty good and accurate, making it a very reliable platform. Loom Business - Enterprise has made team meetings more efficient as sometimes team members are unable to participate. We can create video references for them to connect with others who missed the meeting. This makes the overall meeting more productive despite some members being absent. Since using Loom Business - Enterprise, communication has become more efficient because meeting videos are recorded and made available for anyone who was not present in the meeting.
Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity
There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce, which is currently limited.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature Loom Business - Enterprise offers is video recording; this feature stands out because of its ease of use, quality, and accessibility by anyone in the team."
"Loom Business - Enterprise has made team meetings more efficient as sometimes team members are unable to participate, and we can create video references for them to connect with others who missed the meeting, making the overall meeting more productive despite some members being absent."
"The ability to scale videos is a valuable feature of the product."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to collaborate."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that I can attach files in any format."
"In general, Teams allows me to connect with anyone in the organization and share files with the team."
"I find several features of Microsoft Teams valuable. First, the group chat feature is great for team collaboration and sharing updates. Second, scheduling meetings is very easy, whether through Outlook or directly in the tool. Another useful feature is the notifications for meeting start times, which ensure you don't miss any meetings even if you're working on something else. Additionally, Microsoft Teams creates a chat where you can take and share notes during meetings, which I find helpful."
"The solution is stable."
"Managing meeting on Microsoft Teams is better than managing traditional face to face meetings."
"The tool is simple to use."
"The solution's stability is quite good, and it doesn't crash and freeze up when you have a large number of users."
 

Cons

"The solution must allow users to record videos for a longer time."
"Loom Business - Enterprise can handle our organization's needs as we grow, but it needs to improve its features so that all our needs are met at that point in time."
"Loom Business - Enterprise can handle our organization's needs as we grow, but it needs to improve its features so that all our needs are met at that point in time."
"I think they can improve the all those segments for channel bulking. Also, some functionalities which migrated from Skype for Business to Teams, is not supported by Teams. We had used them in Skype for Business."
"I didn't know that Teams is part of Office 365, so I think that it should be better advertised with its features and capabilities."
"Microsoft Teams could log in faster."
"After six months of working with it, I still find the UI a little clunky when it comes to sharing content and moving around between features like the calendar and files."
"The interface must be more user-friendly."
"Microsoft Teams is quite demanding on bandwidth, which has been a problem during the COVID situation because we don't get enterprise-class bandwidth at home."
"In the next release, I would like to have the interface modernized and brought more up to date."
"The solution should include features like scripting, meeting summarization, and automated notes."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"You don't buy only the Teams license; you buy it as part of the Microsoft 365 bundle."
"We need to pay for Microsoft Teams' licenses on a yearly basis."
"Its pricing is reasonable."
"The solution's cost is high."
"The challenge with Microsoft's licensing model is that the prices are on the higher side, especially for companies that have more users where spending a lot on licenses may be required."
"The tool's price is part of MS Office 365 and I would rate its pricing five out of ten. The tool's licensing costs are monthly."
"The product is expensive, and I rate its pricing a ten out of ten."
"It is moderately expensive than other Microsoft products."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business64
Midsize Enterprise41
Large Enterprise66
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
I have no information about the cost as these are subsidized when procured by companies. Getting a home version cheaper or free would be a better option so students or college-goers can utilize the...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
I am unable to determine which features of Microsoft Teams are the most valuable because we do not have full capabilities due to our Exchange server being on-premise and OneDrive not being authoriz...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

hubspot, airtable, grubhub
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Slack, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: September 2025.
869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.