Meraki SD-WAN vs Omada Cloud SDN comparison

Cisco and TP-Link are both solutions in the Software Defined Networking (SDN) category. Cisco is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while TP-Link is ranked #4. Cisco holds a 23.9% mindshare in SDN, compared to TP-Link’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.

Meraki SD-WAN

Read 77 Meraki SD-WAN reviews

1,592 Views
1,029 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Omada Cloud SDN

Read 1 Omada Cloud SDN review

637 Views
491 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Meraki SD-WAN

Omada Cloud SDN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Meraki SD-WAN and Omada Cloud SDN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Aviatrix, TP-Link and others in Software Defined Networking (SDN).

To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Networking (SDN) Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Meraki SD-WAN

Ranking in Software Defined Networking (SDN)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Cloud SDN

Ranking in Software Defined Networking (SDN)

4th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Software Defined Networking (SDN) category, the mindshare of Meraki SD-WAN is 23.9%, down from 24.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Cloud SDN is 12.0%, up from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

Featured Reviews

Martyn Walker

Business development manager at Virgin Media

Enables productivity in terms of users and has ease of management

Scalability could be improved. Yes, you can add more than 300 or 400 sites onto it, but because it's not a true SD-WAN and, effectively, it's just a Multi-VRF, it's all hub and spoke at that point. That's the nature of the design, but that's what keeps it simple to administer. So, it's a trade off.

Read full review

Gavin Cotton

Partner at Attune

Reasonably priced, easy to deploy, and enables remote monitoring

The implementation is quite straightforward. It works every time. The setup is very easy. I rate the ease of setup a ten out of ten. The deployment can be done very quickly. The time taken for deployment depends on the setup. Generally, it can be up and running in a few hours.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most interesting feature is the amount of information you can get from overseeing the system from a centralized place."

"t is very stable based on our experience and the application performance has been superb."

"Meraki SD-WAN is user friendly."

"We can control and monitor everything."

"The solution has a great UI."

"The centralized console manageable from the cloud is one of the advantages."

"The solution is stable."

"Meraki SD-WAN is a very stable and scalable solution with good technical support."

More Meraki SD-WAN pros

"The solution enables us to monitor and help our customer with their connectivity remotely."

Cons

"The interface in the VPN management system can be a bit complex for users to understand."

"The configuration from the firewall side could be improved a little bit more."

"The only area for improvement in Meraki SD-WAN is its licensing model, as well as its cost structure."

"Meraki is more or less intelligent load balancing, although a lot of features are missing that our SD-WAN solutions will have."

"The deployment time of Meraki SD-WAN can vary. For someone new to the process, it could take a couple of hours. However, for someone with hands-on experience, such as myself, it only takes approximately two to three hours to set up the entire configuration."

"Warm spare is a good failover solution but Meraki could do something more to handle failovers better."

"The product should be able to support more than three internet lines."

"The product could be improved by being made more simple to use. We had some issues integrating our MPLS with Meraki SD-WAN."

More Meraki SD-WAN cons

"The product must provide access points that can be plastered into the ceiling."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One of the most valuable aspects of Meraki SD-WAN is the price. It is highly cost-effective."

"The pricing is fair, but if they can make it less it would be even more attractive."

"The product is not expensive."

"They have a baseline software license, and then they've got an SD-WAN software license, and then they've got an advanced security software license. They're low cost, and they'll provide any amount of flexibility that you want from a modeling perspective for payment. Typically, it's either annually or multi-year, but they are a lower-cost company. They're not the most expensive by far."

"The licenses cost a fortune."

"For a pure SD-WAN solution, the pricing is competitive. However, our clients are on the lower tier in terms of budget, viewing IT more as a necessary expense rather than integral to their business. While Meraki's solution might be pricey for them, there aren't many cheaper, reliable options."

"The price of this solution is good, it is not expensive."

"If you purchase a Meeraki box, you have to purchase a license, and it's already the basic license, you will have you SD-WAN included."

More Meraki SD-WAN pricing and cost advice

"The tool is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Networking (SDN) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Educational Organization

10%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Meraki SD-WAN?

The auto VPN feature is important because it automates many tasks, making things simpler and faster. It helps with setting up devices and changing configurations without manual effort.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki SD-WAN?

The price is a little bit higher than local vendors, for example, Huawei ZTE or H3C. However, some customers require the best quality and performance, thus needing solutions and products from Cisco.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Meraki SD-WAN?

They have to ask us many questions about configurations. It could be improved with some automation to trigger, for example, telemetry data, so we can determine the state of the deployment as of day...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Omada Cloud SDN?

The tool is reasonably priced. There is no licensing fee.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Cloud SDN?

The product must provide access points that can be plastered into the ceiling. The tool should not be visible on the ceiling.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Cloud SDN?

We implement the solution for our clients so that they have Wi-Fi in their villas. We manage the tool for them.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN

Compared 22% of the time

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN

Compared 16% of the time

Prisma SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN

Compared 14% of the time

Cradlepoint NetCloud vs Meraki SD-WAN

Compared 8% of the time

Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform vs Meraki SD-WAN

Compared 6% of the time

More Meraki SD-WAN Competitors

HPE SDN vs Omada Cloud SDN

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco ACI vs Omada Cloud SDN

Compared 8% of the time

More Omada Cloud SDN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Meraki SD-WAN

March 2025

Download Meraki SD-WAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

March 2025

Download Omada Cloud SDN product report

Overview

Software-defined WAN is a new approach to network connectivity that lowers operational costs and improves resource usage for multi-site deployments, allowing network administrators to use bandwidth more efficiently and ensure the highest possible level of performance for critical applications without sacrificing security or data privacy. For more information on deploying and configuring SD-WAN on the Meraki MX Security Appliance, see the Meraki SD-WAN Deployment Guide.

Cisco

Omada’s Software Defined Networking (SDN) platform integrates network devices, including access points, switches and gateways, providing 100% centralized cloud management. Omada creates a highly scalable network—all controlled from a single interface. Seamless wireless and wired connections are provided, ideal for use in hospitality, education, retail, offices, and more.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

École Jeannine Manuel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Aviatrix, TP-Link and others in Software Defined Networking (SDN). Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Software Defined Networking (SDN) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.