No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] vs Nagios XI comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus OpenView [EOL]
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nagios XI
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (15th), Server Monitoring (9th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (11th), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st)
 

Featured Reviews

Reviewer2892 - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President of Infrastructure Management at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Provides proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems
Application logs Oracle/SQL-based systems monitoring Application log monitoring. It minimizes the duration of outages and gives specific alerts to localize the problem (log monitoring). It provides proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems. Correlation Suppression methods Management…
Emmanuel Appiah Boateng - PeerSpot reviewer
Network and Security Engineer at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
Simplifies setup and requires user interface enhancement
Nagios XI is easy to install, which sets it apart from other open-source solutions I've tried. Typically, setting up a monitoring system on Linux involves cloning files from GitHub, building it, and installing many dependencies, but with Nagios XI, it wasn't like that. Nagios XI simplifies our setup and reduces the time spent configuring monitoring tools.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Network Node Manager is good and so is Operations Manager, although they are a bit archaic now."
"A single pane of glass (one GUI to monitor health of the entire enterprise) is the holy grail of enterprise monitoring and management and HP Operations excellently provides that for applications, systems and networks."
"It has a flexible, enterprise-scale monitoring system."
"It supports efficiency and a speedy resolution of issues."
"It minimizes the duration of outages and gives specific alerts to localize the problem, providing proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems."
"It is proactive in heading off failures that would be catastrophic to the business."
"It just makes it possible for the on-call tech to relax and wait for stuff to notify them of problems instead of having to, over the weekend, constantly sign in."
"The most valuable feature is that it is easy to use."
"All of them, but mainly: Highly-efficient server performance monitoring engine Configuration wizards Infrastructure management Configuration snapshot."
"The solution has a lot of plugins and scripts integrated with it."
"Since the cost is zero and it can use a fairly cheap server to run on the ROI is nearly immediate."
"It's great for monitoring IT services infrastructure."
"The ROI is very good."
"It's an essential part of our infrastructure, and we'll keep using it."
"It has a wide variety of plugins in existence, but when there's no plugin available it is quite simple to integrate one's own programs and scripts."
"I can monitor a software made in-house to software of bigger companies."
 

Cons

"With the new Operations Manager, it’s a sexier interface but it doesn’t lend itself as much to being robust."
"We would like to see support for more interfaces."
"It is a bit expensive, but the benefit of this product compensates for its price."
"The product does take considerable care and feeding especially in the later case."
"BSM/OMi is not stable. It takes time for event dashboard to refresh."
"The products are not plug and play even though HP has improved implementation over the years."
"Customer Service: Average. I feel that HP don't always look after their clients as well as they could post-sale."
"The setup was more complex than it needed to be. It required modifications for our unique circumstances at the time."
"Nagios provides most of the features by default, however to add more services to it, it requires additional plugins which require little effort on administrative end."
"I would like a much easier GUI so that I can delete events and logs, which will free up a lot of space."
"They need to develop a better integration with a common ticketing system will be great."
"The scalability of Nagios XI is scalable. However, it is not easy to do."
"Nagios needs to improve their incident manager. Currently, it isn't good for ITIL in my opinion."
"Adding new servers and passive checks (which require setting up agents and NRDS) on servers are a little difficult to do properly when employees don't understand the process."
"If you are monitoring network devices, often it's not scaled for large corporations. Definitely, a minus in that area."
"We are implementing our hybrid cloud strategy, and it will most likely not be suitable for monitoring our public cloud assets."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Nagios Core does not have any payment, but Nagios XI requires payment for the license."
"For the cost of the commercial product and support, and taking into account the open source characteristics of it, I believe it is difficult to a better value."
"You can grow into the higher-priced scale as they learn how to utilize the features for Nagios XI."
"The pricing is high with separate licensing for the product and support."
"Nagios XI is open source."
"It is good to contact experts for advice about what is the best solution for your specific infrastructure and enterprise."
"As it is not an agentless tool, I think it is expensive."
"The pricing is really cost efficient. The licensing is perpetual and can be renewed very easily."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios XI?
The pricing for the Nagios XI product is good and better than other solutions. I would give it a four or five.
What needs improvement with Nagios XI?
The user interface needs improvement. Many tools have poor user interfaces, making them hard to manage and navigate.
What is your primary use case for Nagios XI?
I normally use Nagios XI for our servers. It's not particularly used for network equipment, however, I use it for monitoring our server performance, including CPU, memory, data, and services runnin...
 

Also Known As

HPE BTO, HPE Business Technology Optimization, HPE OpenView
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MTS India
Nagios has over one million users globally, including AOL, DHL, McAfee, MCI, MTV, Yahoo!, Universal, Toshiba, Sony, Siemens, and JPMorgan Chase.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Splunk, Datadog and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.