No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Targetprocess comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Microsoft Azure DevOps enhances productivity and efficiency while offering significant ROI, especially with Microsoft integration, despite integration challenges.
Sentiment score
8.9
Targetprocess enhanced monitoring, planning, and collaboration while reducing costs and reliance on spreadsheets through improved transparency and data integration.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
Associate Director at Grant Thornton (US)
There has been a measurable improvement in productivity of around 40 to 50% after implementing Microsoft Azure DevOps, which has allowed more time to be spent on other things.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
Microsoft Azure DevOps definitely saves a lot of time and resources as well as money for any company, including mine.
Ai Solutions & Digital Transformation Lead at UnifyCloud
I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.
Fleet Manager at UPS
Transparency has increased within and across our teams.
Project Manager at Target
We have seen a return on investment through faster planning and increased productivity in my organization, resulting in faster time to market.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Microsoft Azure DevOps' support receives mixed reviews, with praise for resources but criticism for phone support and response times.
Sentiment score
9.1
Targetprocess customer support is mostly praised as responsive and effective, with high ratings and occasional proactive engagement noted.
When requirements arise, they are raised and often get fixed within one or two days.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
Project Executive at synergyc
Whenever I raised a ticket or needed help, I received great support.
Manager at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees
The customer support for Targetprocess is not very proactive twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, but sometimes they are very active and helpful.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Targetprocess customer support is great and responsive.
Fleet Manager at UPS
The customer support for Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.
Project Manager at Target
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Microsoft Azure DevOps is scalable and flexible, supporting growth across teams and regions with few performance issues despite customization challenges.
Sentiment score
9.4
Targetprocess excels in scalability, efficiently handling growth, diverse projects, and large datasets while maintaining high performance and adaptability.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
Project Executive at synergyc
From a scalability point of view, it is really helpful.
Ai Solutions & Digital Transformation Lead at UnifyCloud
Microsoft Azure DevOps is scalable, with multiple options available to scale up the product as needed, given its Microsoft backing.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
It is very highly scalable because it can handle all my organization's growth easily.
Fleet Manager at UPS
It is very scalable, handling my organization's needs in a perfect manner.
Project Manager at Target
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Azure DevOps is a highly stable platform with minimal issues and is rated highly by developers for reliability.
Sentiment score
9.2
Targetprocess is stable and reliable, though the dashboard may experience lag with large data sets.
Its stability might be attributed to its legacy as an on-premise solution that has been in development for more than 25 years.
Software Architect at RedesCDM
There was just one time when there was some infrastructure issue from Microsoft's side, so we faced some glitches for a few minutes only, not for hours or a day.
DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED
Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely stable, as it is available most of the time, with very few downtimes.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
Targetprocess is very stable.
Project Manager at Target
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure DevOps needs enhancements in task management, integration, customization, security, pricing flexibility, and user-friendly features.
Targetprocess needs better integration, user-friendliness, AI features, personalization, cost reduction, and performance improvements for large data dashboards.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Associate Director at Grant Thornton (US)
Out of the box, the solution is effective, yet with advancements in AI, it has the potential to be more intuitive.
Project Executive at synergyc
Instead of customers having to try many options themselves, they benefit from practitioner recommendations.
Founder & CEO at DevTools
I would like to see improvements in Targetprocess, particularly in AI, as it is needed to allow users to better understand and interpret data.
Fleet Manager at UPS
The cost is somewhat high, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
It should allow users to navigate easily.
Project Manager at Target
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure DevOps offers competitive pricing with free initial users, though some find its structure complex but justified.
Enterprise buyers generally find Targetprocess affordable, competitive, and easy to set up, though costs may rise with extensive use.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
Associate Director at Grant Thornton (US)
I find it to be expensive.
Project Executive at synergyc
Azure charges only the parking cost, not for unnecessary or unwanted cost.
DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED
The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
Project Manager at Target
the cost is not very effective, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
The licensing cost is very affordable.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure DevOps offers integrated lifecycle management, CI/CD pipelines, and extensive customization, enhancing productivity, collaboration, and agile project management.
Targetprocess enhances work management with seamless Jira integration, customization, transparency, and cost efficiency via AWS financial integration.
Whenever something is created or deployed, it automatically triggers the automated scripts, generates reports, and updates the test cases, providing a seamless end-to-end activity.
Senior Automation Engineer at Zellis
Microsoft Azure DevOps helps any organization move ideas from development to production faster with greater automation, improved collaboration, quality governance, and a secure environment.
Ai Solutions & Digital Transformation Lead at UnifyCloud
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
Associate Director at Grant Thornton (US)
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Some of the best features Targetprocess offers include business strategy alignment, resourcing information, mapping of work being executed with business outcomes, and visibility across the enterprise portfolio.
Fleet Manager at UPS
The best features Targetprocess offers include web-based administrators of this application that allow me to do field level mapping in a significant way.
Project Manager at Target
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure DevOps
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
139
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (2nd), Release Automation (1st)
Targetprocess
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Value Stream Management Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure DevOps is 31.3%, down from 37.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 1.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure DevOps31.3%
Targetprocess1.7%
Other67.0%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED
Have built reliable end-to-end pipelines and streamlined cloud provisioning through consistent collaboration practices
I am currently working with open-source tools such as Jenkins for my main CI/CD pipeline, and for enterprise clients, I am using Microsoft Azure DevOps CI/CD pipeline. For other clients, I have also implemented CI/CD YAML pipelines through GitLab CI/CD workflow and GitHub Actions. I am creating the end-to-end CI/CD pipeline from development to deployment and monitoring all of this. Azure Boards is easier than Jira for my understanding because there are very easy points to manage the Agile methodology which we work on. Because it is a GUI, sometimes the process may take a few minutes more than the CLI process since the backend is running the exact CLI, but we are commanding through the GUI. There is definitely a time lag, but it is more secure. Microsoft Azure DevOps pipelines work very seamlessly rather than other CI/CD pipelines, as of my understanding. The downside is that the process may take more time when deploying some clusters, Kubernetes, Azure AKS service, or some vast microservice architecture deployments. There may be a little bit of lag I feel, though I cannot tell very strictly that this is a disadvantage, but sometimes it takes a little more time than other cloud infrastructures. All the major things are done by GUI, which is somewhat a little slow. However, if considering automations, process, monitoring, and provisioning, then it is the best cloud service across all the other service providers. Our implementation is a hybrid cloud. Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely easily scalable. I have worked on many Kubernetes infrastructures and microservice deployments, and I have seen that replication is very good because it is very easy. The replication process is very straightforward. I definitely advocate for using less code because it is very time-consuming. If using GCP or Amazon Web Service, there is more interaction related to work over the CLI process. In terms of Microsoft Azure DevOps, there are many things done by the GUI, which is the best part.
Joseph  Washington - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Target
Visual workflow has improved planning and reporting and now supports data driven decisions
The best features Targetprocess offers include web-based administrators of this application that allow me to do field level mapping in a significant way. It lets us use graphical and custom reports to pinpoint certain trends and I am able to forecast performance. Additionally, program board management, risk stroke dependency management, creating graphs and dashboards, and project governance planning are also great features. Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization because the license cost is low, hence saving a lot of time and cost. Efficiency has been improved. I am able to save approximately three to four hours per project. Also, it has increased levels of cross-team transparency.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business44
Midsize Enterprise28
Large Enterprise70
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?
TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...
Microsoft Azure DevOps: what is your experience regarding pricing and costs ?
I am not much involved in the pricing, licensing, or costing aspects. However, one of my colleagues is involved in the licensing and pricing part, and it is very efficient. We are Microsoft Gold Pa...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Targetprocess?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been very cost-effective. The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
What needs improvement with Targetprocess?
Targetprocess can be improved by enhancing integration. Also, personalization capabilities at every user level should be improved. I would add that it should allow users to navigate easily.
What is your primary use case for Targetprocess?
Targetprocess is a powerful product that is frequently used by the whole organization. The powerful visualization of my workflow is a blessing because it allows me to have a perfect distraction-fre...
 

Also Known As

Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype
Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure DevOps vs. Targetprocess and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.