Microsoft Azure VMware vs VMware Cloud Foundation comparison

Microsoft and Broadcom are both solutions in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category. Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while Broadcom is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 3.7% mindshare in HCCP, compared to Broadcom’s 14.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure VMware

Read 4 Microsoft Azure VMware reviews

781 Views
781 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Cloud Foundation

Read 33 VMware Cloud Foundation reviews

5,022 Views
3,063 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure VMware

VMware Cloud Foundation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

VMware Cloud Foundation and Microsoft Azure VMware compete in virtualization solutions. VMware Cloud Foundation holds an edge with comprehensive integration capabilities and enterprise support, while Microsoft Azure VMware excels in cloud integration and scalability.

Features: VMware Cloud Foundation delivers comprehensive integration with existing VMware environments, robust security, and efficient management tools. Microsoft Azure VMware offers seamless integration with Azure's cloud services, scalability, and enhanced cloud-native capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Cloud Foundation provides flexible deployment options and strong enterprise support. Microsoft Azure VMware offers simplified deployment through a cloud-native framework with quick scalability and support from Microsoft's cloud services.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Cloud Foundation's setup cost is higher initially, with ROI driven by management efficiencies in large enterprises. Microsoft Azure VMware features a flexible cloud-based pricing model with cost savings over time through efficient resource scaling.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure VMware vs. VMware Cloud Foundation Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VMware vs. VMware Cloud Foundation

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure VMware

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Cloud Foundation

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure VMware is 3.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Cloud Foundation is 14.2%, down from 20.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Cloud Foundation	14.2%
Microsoft Azure VMware	3.7%
Other	82.1%

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

Featured Reviews

DhammikaWeerakoon

Solutions Area Lead at Tech One Global

Cloud migration has reduced hardware dependence and optimizes security and AI-ready operations

Microsoft Azure VMware is an area that requires attention. I believe the VMware part should eventually merge with Azure as a single Azure platform, moving away from hypervisor-on-hypervisor architecture and instead bringing VMware features into Azure as native capabilities or as VMware-labeled features running in a true cloud environment. Some features should be brought in to achieve this integration. Additional improvements for Microsoft Azure VMware would include integration with Azure Site Recovery and disaster recovery capabilities. The ideal scenario would be VMware as primary with disaster recovery in Azure, connecting in a native manner. These improvements should be delivered as an integrated solution available out of the box rather than as separate components. Integration with other solutions such as Microsoft Site Recovery should encompass Azure native business continuity and disaster recovery with VMware. Microsoft Azure VMware would serve as primary hosting and connect natively to business continuity and disaster recovery capabilities with Azure. This should be available as a native feature.

Read full review

Narasimha Reddy Illuri

VMware Administrator at Infosys

There is progress in performance and stability, but further advancements are needed for end-user satisfaction

VMware Cloud Foundation's best features include its advanced capabilities, security purposes, and performance levels. The solution offers efficient licensing options. Previously, vSphere essential was available, but now it has moved to VMware Cloud Foundation 8.0. It includes advanced features such as lifecycle manager, patching level, and cluster level patching options. The solution now offers auto-deployment of VMs. Previously, I had to use the content library, right-click, and create VMs manually. With VMware Cloud Foundation, auto-deployment is possible by simply right-clicking and assigning a specific DHCP IP, enabling physical to vCenter level communication for automatic VM deployment. The workload portability feature in VMware Cloud Foundation provides good workload balance. For instance, in a cluster level with four to five ESXi hosts, each host has minimum resources allocated for CPU and memory, resulting in significantly reduced utilization at the VMware Cloud Foundation level.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration is very good."

"The capabilities are like a lift-and-shift operation for moving existing VMware environments to the cloud. The time for migration onto the cloud has substantially reduced."

"For new users, if you have a scalable environment where a VMware data center makes sense for your business, I definitely recommend AVS."

"Regarding stability, it is like a five-star solution."

"Since organizations are already on VMware, they can lift and shift everything to Microsoft Azure VMware, allowing the data center to be moved as a whole rather than as separate servers."

"The fact that it automates a lot of manual processes in a net new environment build is most valuable."

"A valuable feature of VMware Cloud Foundation is its ability to manage everything from a single console, including network, virtualization, and storage management."

"The initial setup is straightforward and easy."

"The product enables flexibility in network structures."

"If you want to reduce the operational overhead and manage your entire virtual infrastructure from a single pane of glass, then I would recommend VMware Cloud Foundation."

"The solution's most valuable features are automated provisioning, network, and storage."

"VMware Cloud Foundation can be used to make private clouds faster than the traditional way and can also be used for continuity."

"They have in release 4.0 features from vSphere and Cloud Suite. It's a complete data center."

More VMware Cloud Foundation pros

Cons

"Microsoft Azure VMware is an area that requires attention."

"The only issue is that a small challenge was found regarding the network...to have extended, smooth VLANs and everything else was a little bit complicated."

"Well, sometimes they release product after product, so it's it's kind of hard to keep an overview of all the different aspects of of the solutions."

"Azure VMware needs to cater to smaller enterprises, as it is currently meant for larger entities. One improvement could be more support for mid-sized or scalable environments."

"In the early adoption of VMware Cloud Foundation, we have seen minor problems. For example, in our Federation, I see the single pane of glass where we need to manage everything, which is good, however, internally, we have a Kafka database that is distributed by the database used by the SDDC manager and during the distribution and synchronization, there is some issue and we need to stop the process."

"The tool's price tag is high."

"The pricing could be a bit less expensive."

"The maintenance cost has increased significantly, especially after Broadcom acquired VMware, with a shift from socket-based licensing to core-based licensing."

"I think the integration potential is very weak with other systems."

"Life cycle management is an area for improvement."

"Typically, the ABA in comparison to other products needs improvement, but it depends on the customer."

"The solution's log management could be improved because the logs don't provide enough information."

More VMware Cloud Foundation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"To be honest, the tool comes at a high price."

"The mandatory requirements, such as a minimum of three nodes, make it expensive. The customers need to sign up for approximately $20,000 per month."

"The solution is very competitive."

"The price of VMware Cloud Foundation is expensive."

"The pricing of VMware Cloud Foundation could improve, it is expensive."

"VMware Cloud Foundation is overpriced, but I think we get what we pay for."

"There is an annual license required to use the solution."

"The tool's price is slightly on the higher side, but I guess you think there is no one-to-one comparison with other tools. The licensing part has become easier, while earlier, it was quite complex."

"I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The pricing is moderate. I would rate it six out of ten."

"The price of VMware Cloud Foundation is a bit high. However, it comes with a lot of useful features and can handle a lot of operational complexity. Overall the price can be seen as being fair for what it offers."

More VMware Cloud Foundation pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

17%

Government

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure VMware?

The pricing is high, rated around nine to 9.5 out of ten. The mandatory requirements, such as a minimum of three nodes, make it expensive. The customers need to sign up for approximately $20,000 pe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure VMware?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure VMware?

People are moving to Microsoft Azure VMware primarily due to reducing on-premises hardware dependencies. One key factor is VMware licensing, and another is hardware costs. Hardware prices are incre...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Foundation?

The price for VMware Cloud Foundation is not cheap, as the market is competitive with AWS cloud. When comparing prices of both clouds, AWS is cheaper because they offer a free section for practice....

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Foundation?

In VMware Cloud Foundation, areas that have room for improvement include the experience between VMware Cloud Foundation and the cloud. I prefer working with the cloud due to my study with the archi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware Cloud Foundation?

Regarding my experience with application migration between on-premises and public clouds using VMware Cloud Foundation, I have used it for storage deployment.

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 27% of the time

VMware Cloud on AWS vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 25% of the time

Azure Stack vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 23% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 11% of the time

More Microsoft Azure VMware Competitors

Azure Stack vs VMware Cloud Foundation

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs VMware Cloud Foundation

Compared 11% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs VMware Cloud Foundation

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon AWS vs VMware Cloud Foundation

Compared 9% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs VMware Cloud Foundation

Compared 6% of the time

More VMware Cloud Foundation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VMware

June 2026

Download Microsoft Azure VMware product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Cloud Foundation

May 2026

Download VMware Cloud Foundation product report

Overview

Microsoft Azure VMware provides a seamless integration of VMware environments into Azure, offering enterprises an efficient way to extend workloads and optimize their IT infrastructure. This facilitates a native VMware experience within Azure, ideal for scaling and modernizing services.

Azure VMware enables businesses to leverage existing investments in VMware tools and skills while taking advantage of Azure's scalability and global reach. Users find it valuable for disaster recovery, datacenter extension, and application modernization. It supports consistent operations and reduces complexity by simplifying operations and cutting IT costs. Additionally, users appreciate its ability to integrate with other Azure services for increased functionality and performance.

What are the key features of Microsoft Azure VMware?

Hybrid Platform: Integrates on-premise VMware tools with Azure for consistent management.
Scalability: Easily scale VMware-based applications leveraging Azure's infrastructure.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust solutions for backup and recovery scenarios, ensuring business continuity.
Flexibility: Supports various VMware workloads, optimizing performance and costs.

What benefits should you evaluate in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Potential for reduced IT expenses by utilizing cloud resources for scaling.
Time Savings: Streamlines operations time with easy management and deployment.
Seamless Integration: Preserves existing investment in VMware tools and skills.
Enhanced Security: Utilizes Azure's comprehensive security features to protect workloads.

In industries like healthcare and finance, Microsoft Azure VMware is implemented to enhance datacenter capacities and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Its ability to integrate with existing resources allows companies to transition workloads without significant disruption, providing a flexible and scalable solution that supports innovation while maintaining operational continuity.

Microsoft

VMware Cloud Foundation integrates high availability, automation, and centralized management for cloud operations, enhancing performance and data protection through virtualization and seamless workload migration.

VMware Cloud Foundation offers comprehensive cloud infrastructure management, facilitating data center consolidation and efficient operations through components like vSphere and NSX. It accelerates deployment and supports lifecycle management with a single-console interface that integrates security features. The platform enhances disaster recovery and infrastructure management, simplifying processes for easy migration and virtualized data centers.

What are the key features of VMware Cloud Foundation?

Clustering Load: Distributes workload effectively across resources to maintain efficiency.
High Availability: Ensures constant access and minimal downtime for critical operations.
Auto-Scaling: Automatically adjusts resources to meet demand without manual intervention.
Centralized Management: Offers a single-console for streamlined control and monitoring.
Integrated Security: Protects data and applications with robust security measures.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating VMware Cloud Foundation?

Reduced Installation Time: Accelerates deployment with automated processes reducing setup time.
Efficient Migration: Supports seamless transitions and data mobility across environments.
Improved Disaster Recovery: Enhances recovery capabilities to protect against data loss.
Comprehensive Infrastructure Management: Unifies management tasks for better control and monitoring.

Enterprises across industries utilize VMware Cloud Foundation to support hybrid and private cloud deployments, virtual desktop infrastructures, and application hosting. It aids in automating infrastructure management and lifecycle processes while providing interoperability for diverse environments. Organizations attain streamlined operations, facilitating data center initiatives and office automation effectively.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

ricoh, dell technologies, sky

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VMware vs. VMware Cloud Foundation

June 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Azure VMware vs. VMware Cloud Foundation

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure VMware vs. VMware Cloud Foundation and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure VMware vs. VMware Cloud Foundation report.

See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.