Microsoft Defender for Business vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection comparison

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5, while OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 5.0. Microsoft holds a 2.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Defender for Busi...

Read 20 Microsoft Defender for Business reviews

4,629 Views
3,425 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

2,040 Views
1,816 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Busi...

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Microsoft Defender for Business compete in the security solutions category. Microsoft Defender is considered superior due to its comprehensive features and seamless integration, offering more value for the investment.

Features: OpenText is favored for its cloud console, user-friendliness, and minimal performance impact, featuring AI functions, endpoint protection, and mobile security. Microsoft Defender has robust integration with Microsoft tools, excellent threat detection and response, and scalability, making it ideal for small and medium-sized businesses.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs better reporting, threat detection, and DNS support, along with improved ransomware protection and customer service. Microsoft Defender should refine threat protection to lower false positives, enhance URL filtering, and improve remote management. Its interface could be more intuitive, and support responsiveness should be increased.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both OpenText and Microsoft Defender support multiple cloud models. OpenText users face DNS and control settings issues during deployment, while Defender users experience easy setup in the Microsoft ecosystem. OpenText service varies, with some quick responses but also dissatisfaction, whereas Microsoft Defender's support is mostly praised despite some challenges in responsiveness and technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is cost-effective, offering flexible pricing and positive ROI with low deployment costs. Microsoft Defender, included in Microsoft 365 licenses, is economical for its users, though some find it pricey compared to alternatives. Its comprehensive security features are seen as justifying the cost, with good ROI reported.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Defender for Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for Busi...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (16th)

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Business is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Defender for Business	2.0%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.1%
Other	96.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Takayuki-Umehara

Public Cloud Engineer at Prudential

Product deployment protects assets but needs improvement in system support

I am doing maintenance for Microsoft Defender for Business, and I'm currently working with it. We don't need to use the latest version of Microsoft Defender for Business. We still use the latest virus definition file that Microsoft Defender for Business has automatically updated. We implement a basic update mechanism. Our compliance division manages how many servers and PCs we have and whether those servers have antivirus solutions. I am not certain about how Microsoft Defender for Business helps with AI-driven security strategies. I just use it normally and don't know if it uses AI technology. I rate Microsoft Defender for Business a six out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A few things are valuable. One is the alerting we see when any kind of intrusion is happening, any kind of malware is being deployed across the endpoints, or any kind of suspicious activity is going on. We have a footprint across all of North America, Canada, and Mexico, so we want to make sure that all our endpoints are protected and we are able to look for any anomalous activity."

"Microsoft Defender for Business is good for small and medium-sized businesses. It offers solid security flexibility and integration with tools like Microsoft Lighthouse and some other software. It takes some of the features of Defender for Endpoint EDR and provides those services for small and medium-sized business environments."

"If you're an Intune user, you can bring in certain capabilities like system-hardening policies, which further enhances the security."

"Because Microsoft Defender for Business is a native solution to Microsoft 365, it has contributed to my organization's proactive defense strategies by saving time on integration."

"I would recommend Microsoft Defender for Business to others, rating it as ten out of ten."

"Microsoft Defender for Business stands out due to its ease of use, particularly due to the fact that many of my customers already use Microsoft and Azure."

"The interface is quite user-friendly."

"The security features in Microsoft Defender for Business that have been most effective for our company include the way it's built-in and intertwined into all the operating systems, giving us a good opportunity to holistically block things for the organization using that tenant."

More Microsoft Defender for Business pros

"The traffic security monitoring, traffic application access feature called the agent, the main feature which is the endpoint security feature are the ones I found valuable. And it also had the in branch security in kind of SD WAN, good three hundred and sixty protection. It is specific and there is ease of deployment also present."

"Low performance requirements."

"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful."

"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

"Auto-Remediation"

"It is very lightweight on the workstations, not slowing them down while still doing its job very well."

"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"We face a licensing issue with Windows 11 Enterprise not reflecting in our portal, which affects activation. Microsoft's support did not resolve this issue, even after sharing remote desktop and screen details."

"Talking with the tool's technician about any problem is very complicated."

"The pricing of Microsoft Defender for Business has a long way to go since people are still preferring solutions such as CrowdStrike and Palo Alto."

"Pricing could be lowered as it is expensive and not suitable for low-budget organizations."

"Microsoft should provide batch management solutions with the application, integrating pass management with roles."

"I have an open case for close to two months with no responses or updates, except for an email response, and I've made four or five phone calls regarding the Microsoft Interconnect for AD and cloud tenant."

"The biggest one is that Defender needs to be more proactive to the emerging threats. There can be tighter integration with email, especially how it integrates with our email system, which is the Microsoft Outlook suite. There should be the ability to react a lot quicker to emerging threats because sometimes, it takes a few days before some of these new threats are fully identified, and we need that to be a few hours."

"Technical support could be faster to respond."

More Microsoft Defender for Business cons

"Its detection capability for certain attacks should be improved. It should have better and wider detection for certain malware attacks. It could also have some sort of RMN."

"Reporting system could be improved."

"Unified threat management (UTM) integration."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

"An updated UI would be nice, but is not hardly used."

"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Defender for Business is included by default with an Office 365 premium subscription."

"The tool is cheap, while some other solutions are more expensive. I remember the tool cost about five euros for a workstation or for a user on a monthly basis."

"The tool's cost has been a little high, but I do not think it was terrible."

"It has to get more competitive because we are starting to see some of the competitors providing better pricing, and some of it, of course, is to gain market share. The Defender product pricing is probably a little higher than the competitors."

"Since we're a nonprofit, we get pretty good discounts on the tool."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is not too expensive. My licenses cost me between $300 and $400. It is really good price wise."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for Business?

Our thoughts on the pricing for Microsoft Defender for Business are that we wish it could be better. If the pricing was a little better, we would definitely increase what we currently have.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender for Business?

I see room for improvement in Microsoft Defender for Business, particularly regarding the consolidation of all security solutions in one place and the integration of AI and data security into the s...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Defender for Business?

I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

Comparisons

HP Wolf Security vs Microsoft Defender for Business

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Microsoft Defender for Business

Compared 12% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Microsoft Defender for Business

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Defender for Business

Compared 4% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Microsoft Defender for Business

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Business Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 23% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Cynet vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Business

January 2026

Download Microsoft Defender for Business product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

January 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

Microsoft Defender for Business is a new endpoint security solution that was designed especially for the small and medium-sized business (up to 300 employees). With this endpoint security solution, your company's devices are better protected from ransomware, malware, phishing, and other threats.

Microsoft

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Mytech Partners

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Defender for Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender for Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Defender for Business vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.