No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Satori comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...
Ranking in Data Governance
2nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (11th)
Satori
Ranking in Data Governance
33rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (31st), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 8.5%, down from 20.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Satori is 1.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Governance8.5%
Satori1.3%
Other90.2%
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

AS
Tech lead at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Automated data discovery has streamlined management while configuration remains complex
Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI. The interface feels a little complicated compared to Big-ID. I did not appreciate the configuration part. It felt complex, whereas when I went for a Big-ID demo, the interface looked better and was easier to understand for any user.
reviewer2873355 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Data Engineer at a financial services firm with 1-10 employees
Streamlined data products have empowered non‑technical teams and still require more automation
The best feature Satori offers is its simplicity for non-business and non-technical persons because all you have to do is provide inputs—the tables that you want to use as source—and then the framework does all the work. You just define the tables and what tables need to be joined. This simplicity helps my team in day-to-day work because non-technical people and product owners can actually develop data products with this streamlined pipeline without having to know how to code and without having to maintain a code base. We just maintain and enhance while they build what they want. Satori also has data quality checks that are defined by the data quality team, so we know if the data are corrupted. That is another main feature. Satori has positively impacted my organization because it's a product that has been sold to many clients and has also been used internally for some use cases that the company needed. It's one of the most successful products of the company.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"My favorite Purview feature is auto-scanning. Once we set up Purview, we can automatically scan multiple data sources when new data comes into specific databases, like SQL and Oracle. We don't need to rediscover the new data or do anything manually because it automatically happens."
"The data lineage feature stands out. It tracks where the data comes from and any changes made."
"The best part is that I can create classifications per my requirements. I use it to classify multiple platforms like AWS, GCP, Azure, and different file sharing systems."
"The most important aspect is our vision to create a data marketplace and Data Governance policies."
"I think Purview does as good a job...I'll say that it is as stable as the data governance maturity that exists within an organization. It can't be more stable than that."
"You can set up automated dates to alert on internal data."
"From my experience and customer feedback, one of the most valuable features of Microsoft Purview is ease of use, especially for content hosted within Microsoft 365 and Azure. I also like that the pricing model for the solution is reasonable."
"The audit log has been a lifesaver for a lot of reasons. Historically, when using SaaS products, there were always questions about how the audit was going and whether we were sufficient out of the box. Purview has many capabilities available through centralized reporting that provide a view of a specific segment."
"Satori has positively impacted my organization by providing a solution that helps in the development of AI intelligence while protecting AI with less effort than other solutions."
"Satori leads to more sales and has doubled our sales."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement when it comes to Purview's data connector platform in supporting ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources."
"I have some concerns about the separation of roles in Purview from the Microsoft tenant, as well as how they interact with the security portal and endpoint manager."
"It supports only a limited number of tools and technologies that pertain to Microsoft products. If you want to leverage other solutions such as Workday or Oracle Fusion, features will be coming up, but as of now, it is for the Microsoft suite."
"Running eDiscovery once a day takes quite a long time because it has to fetch your data. I also want the eDiscovery results to be improved. At the same time, I would like to get a centralized page where I could see records management applied to my Office 365 tenant visualized instead of waiting for a custom script to run through the complete tenant."
"Data quality has been a highly requested feature among customers."
"The support could be better, particularly with consulting."
"Microsoft Purview's compliance processes for handling various Mac and iOS devices could be significantly improved."
"Enhancing the tool's capability to connect to multiple sources would be valuable."
"Everything could potentially be improved."
"Satori can be improved by integrating CI/CD because currently we are doing it manually, which is something we need to fix."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Purview is included in our Microsoft E5 licensing."
"The pricing is decent. It is neither too low nor too high. Given its capabilities, the pricing is justified."
"It's not cheap. I'm not exactly sure how much our license costs, but it is very expensive."
"Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features."
"Microsoft Purview is a subscription-based service, so we need either an E3 or E5 license to use it."
"The solution is extremely affordable for the K-12 space."
"While Purview's standard pricing might not be accessible to most small businesses, we were fortunate to benefit from the educational pricing which made it a financially viable option for our needs."
"The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Construction Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise33
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?
The features in the actual data governance could be improved, and I think there is room for improvement in the product. We haven't used role-based access control in a complex way; it's somehow embe...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Purview?
We are currently working with Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other Microsoft products. We are using Microsoft Purview Data Governance.
What needs improvement with Satori?
Satori can be improved by integrating CI/CD because currently we are doing it manually, which is something we need to fix. Additionally, we could enhance it with more automation, improve the code, ...
What is your primary use case for Satori?
My main use case for Satori is building data products as a Data Bricks framework where I am creating data products for each team following a Data Mesh architecture. I have a wheel file, and when so...
What advice do you have for others considering Satori?
My advice for others looking into using Satori is to train themselves to use it efficiently. It's a very nice product, but it definitely needs some learning curve to get used to it. For Satori's AI...
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview
Satori Universal Data Access Control, Satori Streamlined Security and Compliance, Satori Data and Usage Analytics
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Nestle Via ActiveCampaign Innovaccer Helix
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. Satori and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.