Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs Safeguard by One Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. Microsoft holds a 1.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Read 5 Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management reviews

1,705 Views
1,688 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Safeguard by One Identity

Read 91 Safeguard by One Identity reviews

11,618 Views
6,622 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Safeguard by One Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

One Identity Safeguard and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management are competing solutions designed to manage and secure privileged access. Data comparisons indicate that while One Identity Safeguard excels in pricing and support, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is favored for its comprehensive features, making it a preferred choice despite higher costs.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides strong password vaulting, session monitoring with audit logs, and advanced automated access control. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management offers robust data governance, detailed compliance reporting, and extensive analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard could enhance its UI for ease of use, simplify its advanced configuration options, and expand third-party integrations. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management would benefit from reducing setup complexity, improving detailed access reporting, and enhancing user feedback features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, easing implementation and maintenance. In contrast, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management offers extensive cloud-based deployment but demands a more complex setup, although its customer support is recognized for proactive engagement.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard offers competitive pricing and rapid ROI due to lower setup costs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management involves a higher initial investment but provides significant long-term value with its comprehensive features. The main difference lies in One Identity’s initial affordability against Microsoft’s extensive functionality, which may deliver greater long-term benefits for organizations needing integrated analytics and data governance.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Safeguard by One Identity

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safeguard by One Identity is 4.4%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Safeguard by One Identity	4.4%
Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management	1.6%
Other	94.0%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2797275

Systems Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 201-500 employees

Access control has improved approvals and tracking and now supports just-in-time administration

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval. This means someone doing something has to put in what ticket information is relevant so I can keep track of why they are doing it. They are not just going in there with access to do whatever they want to do. It has to be done with a purpose and I think that is a big key point of it. The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access. I think it is just a matter of how things are set up. If I need to build a server, I have to go in and increase my privileges for an amount of time that is allowed to build the server and then it elapses and then I am kicked out and then the next time I have to do it all over again. This is nice because it keeps track of what is going on. However, it would be nicer if I got a better reporting tool that can show what was happening instead of an email every single time it happens. The access review capabilities of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely benefits me so that I have a better understanding of who has access to what and what they are doing at what time.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is easy to understand, particularly its menu."

"The integration with Azure Identity is a significant advantage, as it allows for seamless automation and power app integration."

"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."

"The integration with other Microsoft solutions is a standout feature of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval."

"The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests."

"Now, once they are logged into the organization and are registered on our ERP system, their complete access will be ready within five seconds, and they will receive an SMS with their username and password so they can start working, which has increased efficiency and effectiveness of the access control function and reduced operational costs while providing services 24/7 on a platform that can be used anytime and anywhere for investigation."

"One Identity Safeguard had a positive impact mainly in improving privilege access control, operational accountability, and audit readiness."

"Safeguard has the ability to record and retrieve in the full-video format."

"In terms of the user experience, it is a pretty useful product. It works in a good way."

"We use the Approval Anywhere, or cloud assistant feature and it is great. It enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time to the approval process."

"The initial setup of One Identity Safeguard was simple."

"One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization in many ways by providing privileged access security and improving compliance."

More Safeguard by One Identity pros

Cons

"I do not see any financial benefit after implementing Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, however, this question would be better answered by my manager."

"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."

"Sometimes, its functions, like XLOOKUP in Microsoft Excel, do not find situations properly, especially without the use of pivot tables."

"The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management could improve integration with multiple cloud environments."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management has made progress in providing insights into generative AI tools being used within organizations, but customers need to further track where sensitive information is being used within AI tooling."

"For the A2A use, it is not as easy as using something like HashiCorp's password management tools."

"I find it challenging mostly when managing complex work, especially when trying to implement it on a larger scale; sometimes it becomes slow, and the automation process also slows down."

"One Identity Safeguard can be improved by fixing the documentation, which is very convoluted as of now, and addressing versioning, as some major bugs and issues are not documented well enough in the documentation, along with some patches and fixes."

"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."

"The user interface can be improved for better searching of user accounts, and if One Identity enhances its support in that area, it would be very helpful."

"There is room for improvement in the launch module. They built in a launch button but they don't have effective instructions for configuring it to allow it to launch an RDP session. They're working on that, but the button is in the live product. If they were going to install something that wasn't useful, they should have just disabled it and not rolled it out with the product."

"One key area is performance and resource usage, especially when advanced features like session recording or OCR are enabled."

"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."

More Safeguard by One Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

More Safeguard by One Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

14%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	93
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I would say some of the things that could probably be improved is probably the reporting aspects. Being able to get a general and easier setup of reporting to show what was enabled for each day by ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I utilize Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management for all of our access inside of Azure and 365, associating different rights to different areas. Whether it is creating, assigning licensing ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

With these two solutions, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management and Admin By Request, other than the fact that it is for cloud and for on-premises, there are no other main differences. I w...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Safeguard by One Identity is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

Safeguard by One Identity could be improved by making the interface even easier to use, expanding reporting and analytics, and providing more customization options for access policies. It would be ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for Safeguard by One Identity is securing and managing user identities and access across the application with a focus on improving authentication, enforcing access control, and red...

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 15% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 11% of the time

Cloud PAM Essentials by One Identity vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 10% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 10% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 10% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More Safeguard by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

October 2026

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management report

Download Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity

October 2026

Download Safeguard by One Identity product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM)

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management offers seamless integration with Microsoft solutions, providing enhanced security with just-in-time access and automated revocation. It supports Azure Identity for automated and conditional access features, streamlining data management across platforms.

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is known for its detailed auditing, customizable reports, and robust security features. While it efficiently manages privileged access and controls roles in platforms like Azure and Office 365, improvement is needed in predefined sensitive information types and large data exports. Users value its capabilities in preventing data leaks and managing access in applications such as Outlook, Word, and Excel. However, challenges remain with AI features and regional relevance of sensitivity types. Documentation could be clearer, and support services improved. Despite these issues, the pricing is transparent, providing a clear view into costs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

Detailed Auditing: Provides thorough logging of access activities.
Just-in-Time Access: Grants temporary elevated access with automatic revocation.
Alerting: Notifies users of changes in access rights.
Integration with Azure Identity: Enables automation and conditional access protocols.
Customizable Reports: Offers tailored analytical reports for better insights.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Just-in-time access reduces risks of unauthorized use.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing Microsoft ecosystems.
Efficient Data Management: Supports the management of sensitive formats, like credit card data.
Pricing Transparency: Clear and straightforward cost structure.

Companies across finance, healthcare, and technology sectors implement Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management to protect sensitive data and maintain control over access roles. Used alongside data protection measures like Data Loss Prevention, it helps organizations reduce the risk of data leaks while complementing other security technologies. Adoption has been broad across industries needing stringent data governance.

Microsoft

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity

September 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.