Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs Safeguard by One Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. Microsoft holds a 1.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Read 5 Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management reviews

1,632 Views
1,616 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Safeguard by One Identity

Read 91 Safeguard by One Identity reviews

11,011 Views
6,496 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Safeguard by One Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

One Identity Safeguard and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management are competing solutions designed to manage and secure privileged access. Data comparisons indicate that while One Identity Safeguard excels in pricing and support, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is favored for its comprehensive features, making it a preferred choice despite higher costs.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides strong password vaulting, session monitoring with audit logs, and advanced automated access control. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management offers robust data governance, detailed compliance reporting, and extensive analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard could enhance its UI for ease of use, simplify its advanced configuration options, and expand third-party integrations. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management would benefit from reducing setup complexity, improving detailed access reporting, and enhancing user feedback features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, easing implementation and maintenance. In contrast, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management offers extensive cloud-based deployment but demands a more complex setup, although its customer support is recognized for proactive engagement.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard offers competitive pricing and rapid ROI due to lower setup costs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management involves a higher initial investment but provides significant long-term value with its comprehensive features. The main difference lies in One Identity’s initial affordability against Microsoft’s extensive functionality, which may deliver greater long-term benefits for organizations needing integrated analytics and data governance.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,076 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Safeguard by One Identity

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safeguard by One Identity is 4.3%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Safeguard by One Identity	4.3%
Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management	1.6%
Other	94.1%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2797275

Systems Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 201-500 employees

Access control has improved approvals and tracking and now supports just-in-time administration

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval. This means someone doing something has to put in what ticket information is relevant so I can keep track of why they are doing it. They are not just going in there with access to do whatever they want to do. It has to be done with a purpose and I think that is a big key point of it. The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access. I think it is just a matter of how things are set up. If I need to build a server, I have to go in and increase my privileges for an amount of time that is allowed to build the server and then it elapses and then I am kicked out and then the next time I have to do it all over again. This is nice because it keeps track of what is going on. However, it would be nicer if I got a better reporting tool that can show what was happening instead of an email every single time it happens. The access review capabilities of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely benefits me so that I have a better understanding of who has access to what and what they are doing at what time.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is easy to understand, particularly its menu."

"The integration with other Microsoft solutions is a standout feature of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management."

"The integration with Azure Identity is a significant advantage, as it allows for seamless automation and power app integration."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval."

"One of the most important aspects is that it is very easy to use and install. It is also agentless, so all of the operations happen more smoothly than any other product."

"One Identity Safeguard is powerful because it provides beneficial features that support clean integration with different tools, significantly improving security and automation processes."

"The whole product solves the privileged access management challenge for our company. We have a secure tunnel, a secure session manager, and automatic logging of sessions, which is good for forensic purposes. We have a rich level of logs and can trace what happened on which machine and see who did what."

"The first feature I like about One Identity Safeguard is the live contact point for the VPNs. This has been working very well for us, as it's both highly available and reliable."

"Since implementing Safeguard by One Identity, we have improved the security of privileged accounts by eliminating the need to share passwords and enforcing controlled access."

"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."

"I have found the most useful feature of One Identity Safeguard to be Privileged Sessions."

"I like the discovery functionality and the change password feature through the check-in. I also like the bulk import with the help of templates that come with it out of the box. With the help of these few features, my tasks are made easier."

More Safeguard by One Identity pros

Cons

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management has made progress in providing insights into generative AI tools being used within organizations, but customers need to further track where sensitive information is being used within AI tooling."

"The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access."

"I do not see any financial benefit after implementing Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, however, this question would be better answered by my manager."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management could improve integration with multiple cloud environments."

"Sometimes, its functions, like XLOOKUP in Microsoft Excel, do not find situations properly, especially without the use of pivot tables."

"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."

"Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that."

"They should provide a faster user interface, as we have noticed that the user interface acts slow when there are a large number of accounts or concurrent sessions going on."

"I find it complicated to implement HTTPS monitoring because the documentation is unclear."

"The deployment affects our privileged users because it takes a long time for them to request privileges, which impacts the SLA."

"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."

"We have feature requests and would like to see the turnaround times on those features to be faster."

"The high availability function of the box itself requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another, so there is room for improvement."

"Many team members feel that the biggest friction with One Identity Safeguard relates to access requests, session approvals, and policy changes, which require more clicks than expected."

More Safeguard by One Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

More Safeguard by One Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Outsourcing Company

14%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	89
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I would say some of the things that could probably be improved is probably the reporting aspects. Being able to get a general and easier setup of reporting to show what was enabled for each day by ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I utilize Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management for all of our access inside of Azure and 365, associating different rights to different areas. Whether it is creating, assigning licensing ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

With these two solutions, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management and Admin By Request, other than the fact that it is for cloud and for on-premises, there are no other main differences. I w...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

Our experience with the pricing and licensing was generally positive. The initial setup costs were reasonable considering the security and access control benefits we are getting. The licensing mode...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

I think Safeguard by One Identity could be improved by making the user interface a little simpler and more intuitive, especially for new administrators. Some configurations and advanced features ta...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for Safeguard by One Identity is to manage a secure privileged account and access a critical system. It helps us to control who can access sensitive resources and monitor privilege...

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 17% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 13% of the time

Cloud PAM Essentials by One Identity vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 12% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 11% of the time

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 11% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Haystax Analytics Platform vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More Safeguard by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

August 2026

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management report

Download Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity

August 2026

Download Safeguard by One Identity product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM)

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management offers seamless integration with Microsoft solutions, providing enhanced security with just-in-time access and automated revocation. It supports Azure Identity for automated and conditional access features, streamlining data management across platforms.

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is known for its detailed auditing, customizable reports, and robust security features. While it efficiently manages privileged access and controls roles in platforms like Azure and Office 365, improvement is needed in predefined sensitive information types and large data exports. Users value its capabilities in preventing data leaks and managing access in applications such as Outlook, Word, and Excel. However, challenges remain with AI features and regional relevance of sensitivity types. Documentation could be clearer, and support services improved. Despite these issues, the pricing is transparent, providing a clear view into costs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

Detailed Auditing: Provides thorough logging of access activities.
Just-in-Time Access: Grants temporary elevated access with automatic revocation.
Alerting: Notifies users of changes in access rights.
Integration with Azure Identity: Enables automation and conditional access protocols.
Customizable Reports: Offers tailored analytical reports for better insights.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Just-in-time access reduces risks of unauthorized use.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing Microsoft ecosystems.
Efficient Data Management: Supports the management of sensitive formats, like credit card data.
Pricing Transparency: Clear and straightforward cost structure.

Companies across finance, healthcare, and technology sectors implement Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management to protect sensitive data and maintain control over access roles. Used alongside data protection measures like Data Loss Prevention, it helps organizations reduce the risk of data leaks while complementing other security technologies. Adoption has been broad across industries needing stringent data governance.

Microsoft

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity

September 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs. Safeguard by One Identity report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.