MuleSoft Composer vs Upsolver comparison

Salesforce and Upsolver are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Salesforce is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.8, while Upsolver is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.3. Salesforce holds a 0.8% mindshare in DI, compared to Upsolver’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Upsolver users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,765 Views
883 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Upsolver

Read 3 Upsolver reviews

869 Views
704 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Upsolver

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Composer and Upsolver based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. Upsolver Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Upsolver

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

28th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (16th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (13th)

Upsolver

Ranking in Data Integration

37th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Upsolver is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
MuleSoft Composer	0.8%
Upsolver	0.7%
Other	98.5%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2784462

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Streaming pipelines have become simpler and onboarding new data sources is now much faster

One of the best features Upsolver offers is the automatic schema evolution. Another good feature is SQL-based streaming transformations. Complex streaming transformations such as cleansing, deduplication, and enrichment were implemented using SQL and drastically reduced the need for custom Spark code. My experience with the SQL-based streaming transformations in Upsolver is that it had a significant positive impact on the overall data engineering workflow. By replacing custom Spark streaming jobs with declarative SQL logic, I simplified development, review, and deployment processes. Data transformations such as parsing, filtering, enrichment, and deduplication could be implemented and modified quickly without rebuilding or redeploying complex code-based pipelines. Upsolver has impacted my organization positively because it brings many benefits. The first one is faster onboarding of new data sources. Another one is more reliable streaming pipelines. Another one is near-real-time data availability, which is very important for us. It also reduced operational effort for data engineering teams. A specific outcome that highlights these benefits is that the time to onboard new sources is reduced from weeks to days. Custom Spark code reduction reached 50 to 40 percent. Pipeline failures are reduced by 70 to 80 percent. Data latency is improved from hours to minutes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"It was easy to use and set up, with a nearly no-code interface that relied mostly on drag-and-drop functionality."

"Customer service is excellent, and I would rate it between eight point five to nine out of ten."

"A specific outcome that highlights these benefits is that the time to onboard new sources is reduced from weeks to days, custom Spark code reduction reached 50 to 40 percent, pipeline failures are reduced by 70 to 80 percent, and data latency is improved from hours to minutes."

"The most prominent feature of Upsolver is its function as an ETL tool, allowing data to be moved across platforms and different data technologies."

Cons

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"On the stability side, I would rate it seven out of ten. Using multiple cloud providers and data engineering technologies creates complexity, and managing different plugins is not always easy, but they are working on it."

"There is room for improvement in query tuning."

"Upsolver excels in ETL and data aggregation, while ThoughtSpot is strong in natural language processing for querying datasets. Combining these tools can be very effective: Upsolver handles aggregation and ETL, and ThoughtSpot allows for natural language queries. There’s potential for highlighting these integrations in the future."

"I think that Upsolver can be improved in orchestration because it is not a full orchestration tool."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"Upsolver is affordable at approximately $225 per terabyte per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Upsolver?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was a very good experience, but it is not a direct experience because it was not my responsibility. It was in charge of the customer. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Upsolver?

I think that Upsolver can be improved in orchestration because it is not a full orchestration tool. I believe it could be better in this regard. The cost needs attention at a very large scale. I th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Upsolver?

My main use case for Upsolver is during an IT consulting project for a large enterprise running a cloud-native data platform on AWS. I used Upsolver to ingest and process high-volume stream data fr...

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 9% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 4% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 4% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Databricks vs Upsolver

Compared 14% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs Upsolver

Compared 11% of the time

SAS Access vs Upsolver

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs Upsolver

Compared 10% of the time

More Upsolver Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

February 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

February 2026

Download Upsolver product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

No data available

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Upsolver's mission is to turn engineering-intensive data lakes into easy-to-use repositories that serve 50X more data professionals compared to the status-quo today. Upsolver cuts 95% from the tedious process of preparing event data for analytics and machine learning, using a visual SQL-based interface, a cloud-native data platform and deep technology for stream-processing, indexing and eventually-consistent file systems.

Upsolver

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Upsolver

March 2026

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. Upsolver

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. Upsolver and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. Upsolver report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.