NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs OpenText Migrate comparison

Why PeerSpot?

NetApp and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. NetApp is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. NetApp holds a 6.1% mindshare in CM, compared to OpenText’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 64 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

12,211 Views
2,442 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

OpenText Migrate

Read 4 OpenText Migrate reviews

2,731 Views
1,666 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

OpenText Migrate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and OpenText Migrate compete in cloud storage and data migration solutions. NetApp excels with its integration flexibility and data management, while OpenText is favored for its simplicity and automation.

Features: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers efficient data management, scalability, and seamless integration with existing IT environments. OpenText Migrate provides robust automation, budget-friendly solutions, and simplifies data migration tasks. The key difference is in integration ease for NetApp and automation for OpenText, catering to distinct operational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is known for straightforward deployment and responsive support but may need more initial configuration. OpenText Migrate stands out for simple, rapid deployment and excellent customer service, minimizing downtime. NetApp focuses on seamless integration, while OpenText emphasizes quick setup.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP involves higher initial costs due to its comprehensive features but offers significant ROI through optimized resource utilization. OpenText Migrate has a lower upfront cost, appealing to budget-conscious customers, delivering ROI via efficient migrations. The difference lies in NetApp's resource optimization value versus OpenText's cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. OpenText Migrate Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. OpenText Migrate

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Migration

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (10th), Cloud Backup (26th), Public Cloud Storage Services (11th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd)

OpenText Migrate

Ranking in Cloud Migration

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Migration Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 6.1%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Migrate is 4.5%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	6.1%
OpenText Migrate	4.5%
Other	89.4%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

reviewer5948293

Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers performance control and cloud integration while supporting data management with granular flexibility

The scalability of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is interesting. We have thought about it, but we haven't used it. I think the scalability is something you scale up rather than respond to peak demand. It wouldn't help with outages either; the scaling is manual, and there are no processes we've used to automate that for unexpected scenarios. We like the scalability; it's enough for what we're planning to use, but we haven't used any advanced features. The standard platform is NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, which is their cloud service. In fact, that's probably the most experience I have with NetApp. I've experienced it on-premise, but kind of secondhand.

Read full review

Ludovik DOPIERALA

Manager, Service Line at ARTEMYS INVEST

Migration projects have become faster and have saved significant time on complex workloads

OpenText Migrate is our primary tool. I know they have a lot of other products like DNS and tools from cybersecurity, but we don't use it at this time. On Demand Recovery, for recovery, we use another tool from OpenText. It's C2C. It's a product to back up the mailbox. I don't know what I can find at this time. So maybe yes, but the last time I used it was a few months ago. It does the job, so I don't have an opinion on this currently. They don't have a lot of marketing actions. We know this product because we are an OpenText partner for the C2C. But it's another division. It's another part of the company. So we don't have a lot of information. So, I think they can improve the communication for the end-user because a lot of customers do not know OpenText, and they don't know they can provide this type of tool. My overall rating for this product is 9.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If anything happens, their technical support will come onsite and fix it."

"First and foremost, test the use cases where you need availability and performance as the key drivers for a solution; in those scenarios, NetApp is way ahead compared to what the competitors offer."

"It gives a solution for storage one place to go across everything. So, the customer is very familiar with NetApp on-prem. It allows them to gain access to the file piece. It helps them with the training aspect of it, so they don't have to relearn something new. They already know this product. They just have to learn some widgets or what it's like in the cloud to operate and deploy it in different ways."

"I would recommend NetApp because it is a stable product."

"ONTAP has been very stable for us, specifically in the cloud environment. It allows us to have high availability as well as standalone systems if that's what we want within our specific workloads. Also, on-premise has been a very stable environment. We have very few outages and when we do, we work with support to get systems back online in a timely manner."

"The most valuable features are the ease of management, the deduplication, storage optimization, SnapMirror, it has flexible in testing for different scenarios, rapid deployment of the test environments, and rapid recovery."

"This solution has helped us because it is easy to use."

"I would recommend NetApp any day, at any time, because there's so much hard work in it."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

"Carbonite Migrate works well in Windows platform migrations and in the case of a VML platform. The migration is smooth in Windows environments."

"Carbonite Migrate is helpful on an infrastructure level."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"It is a good third-party migration tool because it can be used with clients who have heterogeneous environments."

"OpenText Migrate is a very good product because it is an older product and they have a lot of tools, and they have a lot of experience on the migration tools."

Cons

"If they could include clustering together multiple physical Cloud Volumes ONTAP devices as an option, that could be helpful."

"Me gustaría verlos mejorar la perspectiva de inicio y búsqueda en los paneles. Esto permitiría una mejor visualización de los contenidos que se capturan en la herramienta."

"They definitely need to stay more on top of security vulnerabilities."

"NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP needs to have customizable pricing options such as 10 TB increments. They seem to have only two options: 10 TB or 250 TB."

"We want to be able to add more than six disks in aggregate, but there is a limit of the number of disks in aggregate. In GCP, they provide less by limiting the sixth disk in aggregate. In Azure, the same solution provides 12 disks in an aggregate versus GCP where it is just half that amount. They should bump up the disk in aggregate requirement so we don't have to migrate the aggregate from one to another when the capacities are full."

"I would want more visibility and data analytics where we can see anomalies within the shares within the GUI."

"I have used technical support and it's mediocre."

"When it comes to support provided by NetApp, they have room for improvement. Every time we go through their support, we end up answering the same routine questions."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

"Carbonite failed when moving GIS data."

"The pricing for the customer is always too expensive."

"We find it very difficult to use these tools in a multi-cloud environment"

"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved. During RHEL migration with multiple data areas, you have to create a similar source environment at the destination. This can be challenging because you have to install it, create the VM, install over it, and mount it at the mount point. Only then can you do the migration."

"If we had to move 100 applications across a multi-cloud environment, then this solution would not work."

"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Once we deploy the pay as you go model, we cannot convert this product as a BYOL model. This is a concern that we have."

"It is expensive. There are no costs in addition to their standard licensing fees."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product."

"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer."

"If a customer is only using, say, less than 10 terabytes, I don't think CVO would be a good option. A customer using at least 100 or 200 terabytes should get a reasonable price from NetApp."

"The pricing could be improved. It is a good product, but it is very expensive for me."

"The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

"The licensing costs are really high."

"In terms of pricing, I think it's an expensive tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	53

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is actually quite reasonable in price compared to other native cloud storage options. For example, a customer using 100 TB of AWS storage would not benefit from deduplica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

I use NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP mostly in customer companies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbonite Migrate?

Carbonite was not cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Carbonite Migrate?

C2C is OpenText. It's Carbonite. It was a backup for the mailbox and Teams, OneDrive, SharePoint, or similar applications. We don't use it. The only tools that we use to encrypt data are the legacy...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Carbonite Migrate?

I use this project because I work for an IT company in France and we perform a lot of migration work, and we often use OpenText Migrate. We perform a lot of migration of Microsoft Active Directory,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

CTERA Intelligent Data Platform vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

AWS Migration Hub vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 9% of the time

Rivery vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 9% of the time

Nutanix Move vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Zero Downtime Migration vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 7% of the time

Proventeq Migration Accelerator vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Migrate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

October 2026

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Migrate

October 2026

Download OpenText Migrate product report

Also Known As

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

No data available

Overview

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

OpenText Migrate provides a robust and efficient way to transition workloads and applications across different environments, ensuring business continuity and seamless operation in complex IT infrastructures.

OpenText Migrate simplifies the process of moving servers and applications, offering an adaptable and efficient platform that minimizes downtime and maintains data integrity during transfers. It caters to varied migrations, whether on-premise, between data centers, or to cloud environments, supporting the rapid pacing of digital transformation.

What are the key features of OpenText Migrate?

Automated Workflows: Streamline migrations with automated processes, reducing manual intervention.
Scalability: Handle large-scale migrations with the ability to scale operations to meet demand.
Data Security: Maintain security protocols to ensure data integrity throughout the migration.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitate migration across different OS and hardware configurations.
Monitoring and Reporting: Gain real-time insights and detailed reports to track migration progress.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Downtime: Achieve minimal service interruption, ensuring business continuity.
Cost Efficiency: Decrease expenses associated with manual migration efforts and errors.
Improved Performance: Benefit from optimized workloads that enhance operational efficiencies.
Enhanced Security: Protect sensitive data during the migration process, maintaining compliance.

OpenText Migrate implementations are versatile, adept at supporting industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing where IT resilience is critical. Its ability to accommodate diverse migration needs allows sectors to maintain productivity and enhance performance with minimal disruption.

OpenText

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Computrade Malaysia

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. OpenText Migrate

November 2026

Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. OpenText Migrate

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. OpenText Migrate and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. OpenText Migrate report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.