NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Wasabi comparison

NetApp and Wasabi Technologies are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. NetApp is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0, while Wasabi Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. NetApp holds a 6.9% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Wasabi Technologies’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Wasabi Technologies users who would recommend it.

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 62 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

2,577 Views
1,489 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Wasabi

Read 9 Wasabi reviews

2,613 Views
1,664 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Wasabi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and Wasabi are both cloud storage solutions with distinct features and capabilities. Based on user reviews, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP appears to have better data management features, while Wasabi is noted for its competitive pricing.

Features: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers advanced data management, integration options, and scalability, making it highly valuable for complex use cases. Wasabi provides straightforward and affordable storage without added complexities. Users prefer NetApp for intricate needs and Wasabi for cost-effective storage solutions.

Room for Improvement: NetApp users suggest enhancements in cost predictability and simplifying certain configurations, and better integration with other cloud services. Wasabi users recommend improving integration with other cloud services, enhancing data transfer speeds, and adding more security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is praised for smooth implementation and robust customer support, though some find the initial setup complex. Wasabi is commended for its simple setup process and responsive customer service, making deployment easier.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users report high initial setup costs but note good ROI due to extensive features. Wasabi users like the low setup costs and quick ROI due to its straightforward pricing model.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Storage (1st), Cloud Backup (9th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)

Wasabi

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 6.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wasabi is 6.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Pramod-Talekar

Sr Service Engineer at Evolent Health

Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution

The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.

Read full review

DavidWork

Owner at Earthclick.net

Offers reliable and cost-effective backups with impressive stability

We use Wasabi to back up all of our WordPress sites. Anytime we have a new website, it's just easy to add it The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy. We have never had an outage, and it is very reliable and stable. Since it is so inexpensive, it does not impact our profit…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Multiprotocol is the most valuable because Amazon was not able to provide us with access to the same data from Linux and from Windows clients. That was our value proposition for CVO, Cloud Volumes ONTAP."

"The main benefit we get from this product is the ability to deploy it anywhere we want, whether that's on-prem, a remote physical location, or in the cloud. It doesn't matter from an operational perspective where it is. The command line and operating system are the same."

"They have very good support team who is very helpful. They will help you with every aspect of getting the deployment done."

"ONTAP's snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are pretty useful in recovering your data from a time in a snapshot. That's pretty useful for when you have an event where a disaster struck and then you need to recover all your data. It's pretty helpful and pretty fast in those terms."

"If you have a larger amount of data than normal in cloud, it is easy to provision and maintain. Waiting for the delivery of the controller, the configuration of enclosures, etc., all this stuff is eliminated compared to using on-premise."

"SnapMirror helps mirror metadata and data volumes between endpoints in a data fabric."

"The ease of use in terms of how the product works is valuable. We are able to work with it and deploy the storage that we need."

"The ability for our users to restore data from the Snapshots is very valuable."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."

"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."

"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."

"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."

"Overall, I would rate Wasabi a ten out of ten."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

More Wasabi pros

Cons

"In the next release, I would like to see more options on the dashboard."

"We are getting a warning alert about not being able to connect to Cloud Manager when we log into it. The support has provided links, but this particular issue is not fixed yet."

"Their support and development teams can collaborate better to resolve an issue."

"The only area for improvement would be some guidance in terms of the future products that NetApp is planning on releasing. I would like to see communication around that or advice such as, "Hey, the world is moving towards this particular trend, and NetApp can help you do that." I do get promotional emails from NetApp, but customer-specific advice would be helpful, based on our use cases."

"When Azure does their maintenance, they do maintenance on one node at a time. With the two nodes of the CVO, it can automatically fail over from one node to the node that is staying up. And when the first node comes back online, it will fail back to the first node. We have had issues with everything failing back 100 percent correctly."

"We have used technical support. As long as they don't call me at four o'clock in the morning to tell me that a drive failed and they are sending me another one, I like it. They have a tendency to do that."

"The DR has room for improvement. For example, we now have NetApp in Western Europe and we would like to back up the information to another region. It's impossible. We need to bring up an additional NetApp in that other region and create a Cloud Manager automation to copy the data... I would prefer it to be a more integrated solution like it was in the NetApp solution about a year ago. I would like to see something like AltaVault but in the cloud."

"There is room for improvement in tier one support, especially with potential language barriers and communication challenges."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."

"Wasabi could be cheaper, however, it is already really cheap, so I cannot say if there is anything specific that would be an improvement."

"The scalability could be improved."

"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."

"Wasabi could be cheaper."

"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."

"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."

"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."

More Wasabi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is quite high."

"Overall, the pricing of NetApp is aggressive and the pricing becomes more aggressive as the amount of data increases. The cost for a given volume of data that you are storing becomes lower. The greater the volume of data, the cheaper the license."

"The pricing could be improved. It is a good product, but it is very expensive for me."

"Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two."

"If a customer is only using, say, less than 10 terabytes, I don't think CVO would be a good option. A customer using at least 100 or 200 terabytes should get a reasonable price from NetApp."

"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer."

"The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

"Wasabi is a cost-effective solution for data storage, priced at just under six dollars per terabyte."

"I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."

"Wasabi has better pricing than Nutanix."

"The price is reasonable."

"Wasabi is a cheap solution, and users have to pay for a monthly license."

"The price of the solution is inexpensive."

"The tool’s price is very reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

54%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp's support could improve.

See all answers

What do you like most about Wasabi?

The tool is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Wasabi?

We can reserve capacities based on our usage expectations for two to three years. We can pay for it annually. It is quite easy for the organization. The pricing model is quite affordable. The price...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Wasabi?

Wasabi could be cheaper, however, it is already really cheap, so I cannot say if there is anything specific that would be an improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 11% of the time

Zerto vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 2% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 46% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Wasabi

Compared 26% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Wasabi

Compared 6% of the time

Zadara vs Wasabi

Compared 5% of the time

More Wasabi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

March 2025

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

March 2025

Download Wasabi product report

Also Known As

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

No data available

Overview

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

Wasabi Technologies

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

March 2025

Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.