NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

NETSCOUT and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NETSCOUT is ranked #72, while Zenoss is ranked #64. NETSCOUT holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

2,735 Views
2,598 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

6,879 Views
3,302 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG compete in the network monitoring domain. Zenoss Cloud has a pricing and support advantage, while InfiniStreamNG's advanced capabilities offer significant value for in-depth analysis needs.

Features: Zenoss Cloud delivers real-time data collection, AI-driven insights, and flexible integration with third-party services. InfiniStreamNG provides deep packet inspection, network traffic analytics, and granular visibility.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could enhance its deep packet inspection capabilities, provide more detailed network traffic analytics, and improve its support for granular visibility. InfiniStreamNG may benefit from a less complex setup, improved onboarding experience, and more cost-effective solutions for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud offers quicker deployment with straightforward onboarding and proactive customer service. InfiniStreamNG’s more complex setup includes detailed documentation and specialized support, benefiting organizations seeking thorough technical engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud offers a competitive entry cost with faster ROI for cloud-based, scalable solutions. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG, while involving higher initial investment, is valued for its long-term returns through in-depth network analysis targeted at enterprises needing comprehensive insights.

To learn more, read our detailed NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Zenoss Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

72nd

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

64th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (19th), Event Monitoring (14th), Server Monitoring (25th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (50th), Container Monitoring (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zenoss Cloud	0.9%
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"It helps us get to root cause quickly. With utilization and consumption of bandwidth, we can usually see what application is taking as much as they should (or shouldn't), then account for it accordingly."

"The tool has the ability to look back within a month's data. It is very easy to navigate within the tool and troubleshoot the problem, compared to other solutions that we've used in the past."

"An issue that used to take days is now fixed within minutes to an hour."

"It has cut our troubleshooting down by days. Once we have a product in place, we show people examples of how it can streamline their troubleshooting process."

"It has cut our group's troubleshooting time down significantly, e.g., depending on the issue, what would normally take maybe a couple of hours will now take minutes."

"The most valuable features are speed and cost."

"Because we are doing proactive monitoring instead of reactive, the end users don't even see that there is something wrong."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"Overall, it's a great solution, and I consider it to be one of the best."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"It is the most flexible solution of this type, but it takes time to adapt."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"With this solution, they can have one million users at the same time with no crashes."

More Zenoss Cloud pros

Cons

"Being able to manage the packet flow switches in nGeniusONE would be great."

"There is a timeout feature that we have been asking for awhile."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."

"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

"It's not able to communicate with our probes."

"The solution is not great, but it is not bad."

"The technology goes end-of-life on us every year, which is why I am looking forward to vSTREAM. I don't like when devices go end-of-life on us so quickly. If we can get more of an advanced notice of when an end-of-life is brought up, because our certification process within the organization takes a while."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"Technical support is 3/10, poor: Incomplete and poor documentation Undocumented processes Inconsistent solutions to problems depending on source"

"This solution is complex for beginners so it takes some time to learn."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

More Zenoss Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product could be cheaper."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"The price is a little high."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 9% of the time

NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 8% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 6% of the time

Flowmon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 6% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

ScienceLogic vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft System Center vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

August 2026

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG delivers fast, cost-efficient network visibility with a single pane of glass view, featuring real-time traffic analysis, dependency mapping, and performance metrics for comprehensive management.

InfiniStreamNG stands out for its real-time insights into network activity, providing a unified platform for managing network components. Its deep packet inspection, scalability, and compatibility make it an essential tool for IT professionals looking to optimize network performance and resolve issues quickly. User-friendly interface enhancements are anticipated for improved usability, alongside early product lifecycle notifications due to extensive certification periods.

What are the key features of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Speed: Enhances real-time traffic analysis and performance monitoring.
Network Visibility: Provides a comprehensive view with single pane device management.
Packet Inspection: Supports deep packet inspections for detailed data analytics.
Stability and Scalability: Ensures reliable performance and adapts to varying network sizes.
Compatibility: Seamlessly integrates with other technologies for smooth operations.

What are the benefits and ROI of using NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Quick Issue Resolution: Identifies and addresses network issues swiftly.
Efficient Utilization: Offers insights for optimizing resource use and network management.
Proactive Monitoring: Facilitates early detection of potential issues to maintain performance.
Application Performance Tracking: Monitors app connectivity and performance effectively.
KPI Evaluation: Provides comprehensive data for informed decision-making.

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is implemented across industries for packet collection and analysis, serving network monitoring and troubleshooting needs. Companies in telecommunications monitor LTE roaming traffic, while financial institutions rely on it for analyzing banking data. It supports application connectivity checks and proactive remote site monitoring, becoming integral in evaluating KPIs and reporting network issues.

NETSCOUT

Zenoss Cloud provides a comprehensive overview of IT environments, supporting cross-cloud functionality, scalability, and robust integrations. It offers dynamic monitoring through its intuitive dashboard and supports hybrid deployments across cloud and on-premises infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud enables users to monitor network infrastructure and operator platforms efficiently. With features like agentless monitoring and real-time alerts, Zenoss Cloud integrates seamlessly with external systems such as ITSM tools. Its flexible functionality allows for the management of both on-premises and cloud infrastructures like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from easy setup and strong technical support, although they seek enhancements in AI capabilities and simpler installation. The pricing model and complexity for beginners and storage monitoring are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of Zenoss Cloud?

Dynamic Monitoring: Enhances user experience with real-time insights.
Cross-Cloud Functionality: Supports hybrid deployments across AWS and Azure.
Agentless Monitoring: Simplifies deployment with minimal overhead.
Scalability: Grows with your network's demands.
Custom Integration: Supports notifications and alerts tailored to user requirements.

What benefits should users expect from Zenoss Cloud?

Time Efficiency: Quick setup and operation save resources.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive documentation streamlines troubleshooting.
Cost-effective Monitoring: Prevents multiple charges in server monitoring.
Enhanced User Experience: Offers seamless integration with existing IT infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud is widely used in monitoring solutions for industries including technology and data centers. It supports direct monitoring of systems like vSphere and NetApp, making it ideal for IT operations and managed services. Integration with tools such as ServiceNow and SolarWinds aligns it with diverse IT environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

U.S. Department of Defense

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Zenoss Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.