

ScienceLogic and New Relic compete in the IT management solutions category. New Relic, with its robust features and higher ROI, has the upper hand based on user reviews.
Features: ScienceLogic offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, ease of deployment, and strong customer support. New Relic provides detailed tracing, extensive integrations, and advanced features.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic needs better reporting functionalities, enhanced customization options, and user interface improvements. New Relic users suggest improvements in infrastructure monitoring, more competitive pricing, and simplified setup processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is praised for its smooth deployment and responsive customer service. New Relic, while more complex to deploy, offers exceptional support, balancing the initial setup challenges.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is cost-effective with good ROI, but the upfront setup cost can be high. New Relic is more expensive but delivers superior ROI due to its extensive feature set, making it worth the higher price.
There is return on investment because since we reduced the downtime, we can definitely save a lot of money within that period.
There is a definite return on investment for New Relic, as we would not have invested in building its infrastructure if there were no returns.
One of the metrics that helped as a return on investment was the ability to detect issues faster and troubleshoot more quickly, which in turn helped to achieve a much better service level agreement with customers.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
If I drop an email to them, they will respond quickly to my email.
Customer support from New Relic is very good, and we rarely need to create support tickets.
They are very polite and helped him out.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
We currently use New Relic for tens of thousands of developers and hundreds of teams within our organization, and we have not encountered any scalability issues.
It is also suitable for cloud native architectures, SaaS, or software as a service, and for high volume data ingestion also.
New Relic's scalability is good based on my experience, and it can handle my organization's needs as they grow.
New Relic lags sometimes.
New Relic is stable based on my experience, as I have not seen any problems with the UI.
Stability should relate to whether the platform fails, stops working, or breaks.
If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful.
Using real-time data, if there are any malicious patterns or something happening, they can identify those.
Because of the pricing model, organizations have experienced uncontrolled costs and were not able to afford New Relic.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
Considering the features New Relic offers, the pricing or cost setup has not been a blocker for our budget.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort.
New Relic is very useful for teams that don't have much of a dedicated DevOps team but want to have observability for their platform, and it's an easy way to get started.
New Relic has positively impacted our organization by reducing errors, improving performance, and saving time.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| New Relic | 3.1% |
| ScienceLogic | 1.6% |
| Other | 95.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 65 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 50 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.
New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.
What are New Relic's most important features?In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.