Nintex Process Platform vs Oracle BPM comparison

Nintex and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Nintex holds a 2.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,066 Views
686 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Oracle BPM

Read 25 Oracle BPM reviews

1,404 Views
517 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Oracle BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and Oracle BPM Suite both compete in the business process management category. While Nintex excels in ease of use and specific integrations, Oracle BPM offers comprehensive industry-standard process modeling and integration capabilities, often making it the favored choice for complex enterprise environments.

Features: Nintex provides scalability and high performance, with SmartForms enabling quick web form development and seamless mobile integration. It leverages its SmartObject technology for robust data management and effortless workflow creation, particularly within SharePoint. Oracle BPM focuses on process modeling using BPMN 2.0 and Java EE Connector Architecture. It excels in integration with third-party systems and comprehensive metrics reporting, supporting both industry standards and business rules that enhance workflow management.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could advance its management console and error reporting; users find managing workflows challenging due to inadequate troubleshooting information. Additionally, performance can suffer under heavy server load. Oracle BPM users find it costly and complex, particularly with integration lacking in modern API standards and AI technology. On-premise solutions have a steep learning curve and are often labeled cumbersome.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex allows flexible deployment both on-premises and in the cloud, backed by 24/7 global support. However, its response times can sometimes be slow. Oracle BPM mainly supports on-premises deployment with limited hybrid cloud solutions, and its technical support is often criticized for inefficiency in problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex is considered expensive, especially compared to Microsoft's native functions. Its shift from a perpetual to consumption-based pricing model aids scalability but can quickly increase costs. Despite the expense, ROI is positive due to workflow efficiencies. Oracle BPM's pricing is high, with comprehensive licensing and additional support charges, though it offers significant ROI through advanced process automation and integration efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (11th), Workload Automation (13th)

Oracle BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BPM is 2.0%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Vitor Medeiros

National Sales Director at Konica Minolta

Offers capacity to integrate with external platforms but technically difficult

There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms. When we need to develop the forms, we don't have much customization, and I think we need more flexibility there. It's technically difficult, but it would be great to be able to develop our own code and integrate it into the platform. We could then run our own code for specific actions and requests or even develop a page or form. So, if I can ask Nintex for something, it would be a way to integrate our own code for specific actions. When it comes to integration, it could have more options for custom requests.

Read full review

Erick Kathurima

CIO at Clarinox Technologies Kenya

Helpful tool for business process management integration and a straightforward setup

Oracle BPM is used as a tool integrated into another system. It helps in business process management and the generation of reports, predominantly at the end of the month For any new deployment of any system, it helps in improving some efficiencies, which is the reason for having the system. It…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."

"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."

"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."

"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."

"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."

"It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"The solution provides extensive functionalities."

"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."

"Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes."

"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."

"Currently, we define the tasks, and based on certain decision rules, the tool decides the task priorities and the time frame of the task."

"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."

"We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."

"The support is good."

More Oracle BPM pros

Cons

"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"The security features for this solution need to be improved."

"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."

"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."

"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."

"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."

"It would be good if they could provide some additional connectors or an application developer environment for microservices."

"The solution's licensing cost is very high."

"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"You have to maintain it manually."

"From my knowledge of this solution, I don't see that the Oracle BPM includes features such as the growth of discovery and process mining."

"Their Case Management set of features is severely lacking and should be a target for immediate improvement dealing with unpredictable processes inside of organizations."

More Oracle BPM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

"This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."

"Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses."

"We received the product packaged into the Oracle database solution."

"I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."

"It's pried high, this solution is expensive."

"The licensing model is good."

"The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."

More Oracle BPM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

19%

Educational Organization

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Wireless Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle BPM?

The solution provides extensive functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle BPM?

The licensing is expensive. It needs to be more affordable, especially in the Kenyan market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPM?

Oracle BPM should ensure its product is aligned with current technology by keeping up with advancements like AI. There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more re...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 18% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Oracle BPM

Compared 28% of the time

Camunda vs Oracle BPM

Compared 25% of the time

IBM BPM vs Oracle BPM

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Oracle BPM

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Oracle BPM

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM

June 2025

Download Oracle BPM product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Oracle Business Process Management

Overview

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

Oracle

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM

June 2025

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.