Oracle BPM vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Oracle holds a 1.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Oracle BPM

Read 25 Oracle BPM reviews

1,463 Views
1,171 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 60 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

6,695 Views
4,434 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Oracle BPM

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in the business process management category. Based on feature comparisons, Oracle BPM may be more suitable for developers due to its integration tools and comprehensive solution, while SAP Signavio stands out for its user-friendly collaboration capabilities, making it ideal for business-centric users.

Features: Oracle BPM offers excellent integration with databases and applications, supporting BPMN 2.0 for effective dynamic and static process management. It is appreciated for its ease of use, rich out-of-the-box features, and compliance with industry standards. SAP Signavio Process Manager excels with its simple interface, strong business process modeling capabilities, and the collaborative features of the Collaboration Hub, which enhance transparency and user collaboration.

Room for Improvement: Oracle BPM could improve its complex tools such as ADF, enhance user interfaces, and offer process mining and discovery. SAP Signavio Process Manager could enhance its collaborative functions, improve integration with process intelligence, and better support non-English languages. Competitive pricing is also a concern for some users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPM offers on-premises deployment options, appealing to businesses desiring control but adding complexity. Customer service feedback is mixed. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers flexible deployment across public and private clouds, supporting hybrid IT environments. Users value its responsive customer service but suggest improvements for complex technical support queries.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPM's high pricing and complex licensing, especially on virtualized platforms, can be a barrier, though users see ROI benefits in sectors like government. SAP Signavio Process Manager has varied pricing, yet is considered expensive by some, particularly after joining SAP. Despite this, its business process harmonization provides efficiency gains, making it a valuable investment for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Oracle BPM is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.7%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

SatyajitSethy

Architect at Netcracker

Provides a complete workflow from testing to production and can handle a million concurrent requests

The user interface is very good. Once you understand it, it's easy to define rules and do any configurations. It comes with an embedded WebLogic application server, which you have to deploy automatically. Once you run the given binary, it will automatically keep everything on the backend. You'll have to create an instant database, and maintain or manage it based on the rules engine. After that, your system is ready to test. The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production. Throughout the testing, everything was good. Many customers are interested in the rules engine. A lot of requests pass through BPM because it's integrated with a lot of other applications or sub-applications.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides extensive functionalities."

"The support is good."

"I find the data lineage features most valuable."

"Currently, we define the tasks, and based on certain decision rules, the tool decides the task priorities and the time frame of the task."

"The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."

"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."

"This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations."

"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."

More Oracle BPM pros

"For the collaboration functions, we use the commenting and quick model functions for process owners who don't have specific knowledge about Process Manager."

"I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us."

"It is highly user-friendly and easy to use, even for those who are not familiar with product modeling."

"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."

"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."

"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems."

"The time it takes to get from deployment to production could be faster."

"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."

"Their Case Management set of features is severely lacking and should be a target for immediate improvement dealing with unpredictable processes inside of organizations."

"The solution's licensing cost is very high."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."

"There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more responsive to technological changes."

More Oracle BPM cons

"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."

"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."

"We would like a better way to give users the correct permissions for processes, whether to view or design."

"The solution is complex."

"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."

"There is a need for more varied access packages. The access packages that I have used are not cheap enough. They also provide a complete set of tools that are not always used. Sometimes, you need more segregated things, e.g., Signavio includes functionality for a company that has not yet matured. Since there are no basic packages, the company must pay for a package that is not fully used. Typically, process management is started in a company of a certain maturity."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"Technical support has been somewhat challenging; there hasn't been much visibility on how to create a ticket or integrate with SAP."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."

"The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses."

"The pricing is very expensive."

"I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."

"This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."

"The licensing model is good."

"It's pried high, this solution is expensive."

"As with all Oracle products, the licensing over VMware is an issue."

More Oracle BPM pricing and cost advice

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The product is expensive."

"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

Wireless Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle BPM?

The solution provides extensive functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle BPM?

The licensing is expensive. It needs to be more affordable, especially in the Kenyan market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPM?

Oracle BPM should ensure its product is aligned with current technology by keeping up with advancements like AI. There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more re...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

After SAP acquired Signavio, the prices increased significantly, making it too expensive for our small company to afford.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Oracle BPM

Compared 26% of the time

IBM BPM vs Oracle BPM

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Oracle BPM

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Oracle BPM

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Oracle BPM

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle BPM Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 31% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM

May 2025

Download Oracle BPM product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Oracle Business Process Management

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

Oracle

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.