Nolio Release Automation vs SAS rPath [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and SAS are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.

Nolio Release Automation

Read 51 Nolio Release Automation reviews

3,013 Views
2,892 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SAS rPath [EOL]

Read 1 SAS rPath [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

Nolio Release Automation

SAS rPath [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nolio Release Automation and SAS rPath [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nolio Release Automation

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (8th)

SAS rPath [EOL]

Average Rating

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh B N

DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital

Real-time monitoring and seamless integration enhance deployment efficiency

The main disadvantage I see is the limited awareness of Nolio Release Automation in other organizations. It is a very nice tool, but its market presence is limited. I heard from the organization that the licensing cost was somewhat expensive. Perhaps focusing on marketing efforts would be beneficial. It is a really nice tool, and I am unsure why many organizations are not using Nolio Release Automation. It is one of the greatest tools for continuous deployment, yet its popularity remains limited. Some organizations are not aware of its existence. This might be an area worth researching and potentially developing new marketing strategies.

Read full review

it_user172788

Senior Software Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake.

rBuilder Packaging and Automation I Integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and setup a Continuous Deployment API, deployment options, and the documentation. 2.5 years Yes, as did not support platforms like ubuntu. No issues encountered We did not test scalability Customer Service: Customer Service…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The release time has gone down from a number of days to a few minutes."

"We now have, instead of three-hour deployments, they're three minutes."

"Before LISA RA implementation, the developers request for a restart would, for instance, take two to three days, with LISA RA, we developed a process where the restart is done within 10-15 minutes, and this process is used 15-20 times a day, from Monday to Friday."

"It's a stable product."

"UI-based orchestration Ease of use of the application from anyone who is technical to completely non-tech folk Great visualization and consolidation of reports across the organization"

"The benefits achieved for the clients are: Reduction in downtime, less time to market, shorter turn around times in case of failure, earlier development, and Ops teams who used to work in silos are now more coordinated."

"This is purely an automation tool which has helped us to move from traditional manual deployments to zero-touch deployments."

"We have the repeatability, we have the confidence that it's doing the same thing each time the way we've set it up to do and just being able to have the expectation of knowing exactly what's going to happen in the order that our infrastructure needs it to happen."

More Nolio Release Automation pros

"I integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and set up a Continuous Deployment."

Cons

"Error handling needs to be improved in some of the action packs."

"Tags are virtual snapshots of different deployment processes. Over time, if you often update your processes, it gets hard to track what exact changes were made between the different tags of the same process."

"There are some stability issues. Sometimes, the server crashes or throws out of memory."

"How the product could really improve is when we were actually given the product and started to implement it, we were looking to CA to provide best-case scenarios. But because we're so unique, we had no templates to work off of."

"What I personally want to see is more features for data warehousing deployment."

"In the next release, I would like to see more features to use active directory. And more rules to support more Python scripts and to work with Kubernetes and clouds, to have an easy solution for a lot of parameters."

"It is possible to have a lot of execution servers, but you can’t put them in a balanced pool of servers."

"There are some technologies that this product doesn't support such as some emerging technologies that we need to build the interfaces for; so if that came as a readymade/off-the-shelf feature, it would help us."

More Nolio Release Automation cons

"Customer Service was poor Technical Support: Only a few people actually had in-depth knowledge"

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

15%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	39

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Nolio Release Automation?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nolio Release Automation?

I am working for an organization where they have been using Nolio Release Automation since 2016-2017. We are currently using version 6.6, and due to dependencies and lack of support from Broadcom, ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nolio Release Automation?

The 6.9 version offers significant improvements over 6.6. The dashboard is very appealing, showing information about applications and offline agents. We can easily remove offline agents and upgrade...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

UrbanCode Deploy vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 16% of the time

Digital.ai Deploy vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Release Control vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 8% of the time

More Nolio Release Automation Competitors

UrbanCode Deploy vs SAS rPath [EOL]

Compared 62% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs SAS rPath [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

More SAS rPath [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation

September 2026

Download Nolio Release Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

August 2026

Download SAS rPath [EOL] product report

Also Known As

CA Release Automation

rPath

Overview

Nolio Release Automation streamlines deployment processes with a versatile GUI supporting both technical and non-technical users. The platform integrates with tools such as Jenkins and ServiceNow, enhancing release management efficiency while supporting diverse operating systems.

Nolio Release Automation provides a flexible platform for workflow creation without programming. It offers pre-built action packs and zero-code deployment design to streamline deployments, reducing release times significantly. While the integration with modern tools could improve and the documentation lacks depth, Nolio nonetheless centralizes production deployment activities and provides critical infrastructure for DevOps teams. Despite needing better scalability and process version control, organizations continue using the platform for virtual services and to navigate dependencies due to Broadcom's support limitations.

What are the key features of Nolio Release Automation?

User-friendly GUI: Facilitates use by technical and non-technical staff.
Zero-code workflows: Allows creation of workflows without programming expertise.
Pre-built action packs: Offers ready-to-use solutions for deployment tasks.
Tool integration: Compatible with Jenkins and ServiceNow through plugins.
Cross-platform support: Operates on diverse operating systems seamlessly.
Enhanced visibility: Provides clear insights into release processes.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Efficiency boost: Streamlines deployment, reducing time and costs.
Team productivity: Improves release management and operational control.
Scalability: Supports a wide range of organizational needs and environments.
Cost reduction: Decreases reliance on external vendors and costly resources.
Flexibility: Adapts to various deployment scenarios and technologies.

Nolio Release Automation is implemented across industries to manage and deploy web applications and data systems efficiently. Companies leverage its capabilities for virtual service offerings, minimizing vendor dependency and associated costs. The platform serves as a central deployment tool for production environments, with updates from version 6.6 to 6.9 managed by DevOps teams despite limitations in support and scalability.

Broadcom

rPath is specialized in automating the assembly, provisioning and updating of diverse operating systems and middleware platforms and application stacks throughout enterprises.

SAS

Sample Customers

CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco. Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.

Kaiser Permanente, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County DPSS, Lotte.com Nantes University Hospital Center, National Bank of Greece, National Board of Social Services

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.