No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs SAS rPath [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Red Hat and SAS are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 97% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution.
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews
  • 21,141 Views
  • 3,383 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
SAS rPath [EOL]
Read 1 SAS rPath [EOL] review
    0% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

    SAS rPath [EOL] and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform compete in the configuration management and automation sector. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform seems to have the upper hand due to its active development and extensive feature set.

    Features: SAS rPath [EOL] offered automated software assembly, efficient system image management, and deployment capabilities. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform provides comprehensive IT automation, configuration management, and orchestration capabilities. The extensive features of Ansible make it more suitable for organizations seeking robust IT automation solutions.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is known for its straightforward deployment model and strong customer support, including a well-documented ecosystem and community resources. SAS rPath [EOL] had less modern customer support due to its end-of-life status, affecting deployment efficiency.

    Pricing and ROI: SAS rPath [EOL] was attractive for budget-conscious buyers due to competitive pricing, but its end-of-life status limits its long-term ROI potential. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform may involve a higher setup cost yet promises a compelling ROI with ongoing updates and advanced capabilities, justifying investment for those prioritizing forward-looking solutions.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: October 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    October 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
    Average Rating
    8.6
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.3
    Number of Reviews
    72
    Ranking in other categories
    Release Automation (4th), Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st)
    SAS rPath [EOL]
    Average Rating
    5.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Manas Kashyap - PeerSpot reviewer
    Manas Kashyap
    Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital
    Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes
    The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.
    Read full review
    it_user172788 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user172788
    Senior Software Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake.
    rBuilder Packaging and Automation I Integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and setup a Continuous Deployment API, deployment options, and the documentation. 2.5 years Yes, as did not support platforms like ubuntu. No issues encountered We did not test scalability Customer Service: Customer Service…
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "It saves time; it cut our configuration time; it is very easy to use, and there is less room for error."
    "The reason I like Ansible is, first, the coding of it is very straightforward, it's very human-readable."
    "The API for exposing all our infrastructure services is the most valuable feature."
    "So far, the main thing we've been doing with it is using it to automate our monthly patching of servers, and we can, in one hour, do a patch that would take people one night to do."
    "The automation manager is very good."
    "It increases our company's efficiency, automating all the simple tasks which used to take hours of somebody's time."
    "Automation tracking is the most valuable feature."
    "It is very extensible. There are many plugins and modules out there that everybody helps create to interact with different cloud providers as well."
    More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros
    "I integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and set up a Continuous Deployment."
     

    Cons

    "At this time, I do not have anything to improve. What we struggle with is the knowledge base, but that is more about us having to go and find it and learn the platform on our own rather than an actual Ansible issue."
    "Ansible can face scalability issues, such as limitations when trying to scale up infrastructure. It might struggle with connection dropping or spawning additional VMs under certain conditions."
    "Because some documentation needs to be improved - while getting started with it is getting better - it's hard to give it a perfect ten."
    "In my opinion, one thing that needs improvement is mass updates: How I can parallelize that process a little bit better?"
    "The tool should allow us to create infrastructure. It has everything when it comes to management, but it lacks the provisioning aspect."
    "What I would like to see is a refined Dashboard to see, when I log in: Here are all my jobs, here are how many times they've executed; some kind graphical stitching-together of the workflows and jobs, and how they're connected. Also, those "failed hosts," what does that mean? We have a problem, a failed host can be anything. Is SSH the reason it failed? Is the job template why it failed? It doesn't really distinguish that."
    "Ansible has just been upgraded, and the only issue that we are seeing at the moment is that the user interface can be slow. We're currently investigating the refresh period with Red Hat when you click a job and run a job. It seems that the buffer no longer runs in real-time. We haven't discovered whether that's partially an issue with our environment, but Red Hat has come back and said that they're working on a couple of bugs in the background. We've upgraded to that version in the last six months, and that's the only issue that we've seen."
    "There are some options not available in the community edition of the solution."
    More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons
    "Customer Service was poor Technical Support: Only a few people actually had in-depth knowledge"
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "Like many Red Hat products, they have a no-cost version of the web application (AWX, formerly Ansible Tower), but you are on your own to install and it is a little more complicated than just installing Ansible."
    "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an expensive solution. There may be additional fees to use advanced features."
    "We're charged between $8 to $13 a month per license."
    "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution."
    "The pricing is pretty standard."
    "The cost is high, but it still works well."
    "Ansible Tower is free. Until they lower the cost, we are holding off on purchasing the product."
    "The cost is determined by the number of endpoints."
    More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice
    Information not available
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    16%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
    Outsourcing Company
    8%
    Government
    6%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business25
    Midsize Enterprise8
    Large Enterprise52
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
    Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...
    See all answers
    How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
    Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There is no pricing and no licensing required, as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform ...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
    Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Compared 6% of the time
    Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
    Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Compared 6% of the time
    VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
    VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Compared 5% of the time
    BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
    BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Compared 4% of the time
    Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
    Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Compared 4% of the time
    More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors
    UrbanCode Deploy vs SAS rPath [EOL] Logo
    UrbanCode Deploy vs SAS rPath [EOL]
    Compared 61% of the time
    Nolio Release Automation vs SAS rPath [EOL] Logo
    Nolio Release Automation vs SAS rPath [EOL]
    Compared 21% of the time
    More SAS rPath [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    October 2026
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reportDownload Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    October 2026
    SAS rPath [EOL] reportDownload SAS rPath [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS
    rPath
     

    Overview

    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

    What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

    • Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
    • Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
    • Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
    • Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
    • Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
    • Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

    What benefits and ROI should one consider?

    • Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
    • Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
    • Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
    • Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
    • Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

    In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

    Red Hat
    rPath is specialized in automating the assembly, provisioning and updating of diverse operating systems and middleware platforms and application stacks throughout enterprises.
    SAS
     

    Sample Customers

    HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
    Kaiser Permanente, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County DPSS, Lotte.com Nantes University Hospital Center, National Bank of Greece, National Board of Social Services
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    October 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Release Automation. Updated: October 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.