Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Nutanix and Splunk are both solutions in the Container Monitoring category. Additionally, 100% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Read 14 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 274 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

32,356 Views
6,148 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 1, 2025

Splunk AppDynamics and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) [EOL] compete in the IT environments monitoring category. Splunk AppDynamics appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive features in deep application monitoring, which are highly rated for performance troubleshooting and comprehensive issue analysis.

Features: Splunk AppDynamics offers stack trace monitoring with transaction snapshots and deep-dive diagnostics, providing robust monitoring tools across various IT environments. It enables detailed stack trace viewing for quick troubleshooting and is praised for JVM and hardware monitoring. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) [EOL] is noted for its ease in deploying and managing Kubernetes clusters, allowing straightforward handling of resources and containers, efficient resource allocation, and quick deployment capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users of Splunk AppDynamics highlight a need for UI improvements and better integration with third-party tools and network monitoring, as well as simplified configuration options including LDAP integration and asynchronous call tracking. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) [EOL] users suggest enhancements in advanced Kubernetes functionalities, improved documentation, and better scalability and troubleshooting support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk AppDynamics is known for its flexibility, supporting deployment across public clouds, hybrid environments, and on-premises, with well-rated responsive customer support. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) [EOL] is primarily on-premises, benefiting from Nutanix's ecosystem support, though it might not match Splunk AppDynamics' level of customer service engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk AppDynamics is considered expensive but often justified by its ROI through improved productivity and troubleshooting efficiency. It offers multiple licensing options but may incur additional costs with extra features. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) [EOL] is cost-effective for existing Nutanix users as it is often included in Nutanix licenses, though remote deployments could incur extra costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Monitoring Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Container Monitoring

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

274

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (1st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2741271

Nutanix Administrator at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Has provided seamless upgrade experiences and robust technical support

I have heard there are many features added in NKP that are not available in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, such as load balancer features. The unified control plane feature is not being used in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE. We are currently using a third-party tool for load balancing, but going forward, NKP will include load balancer, ingress, and egress features, making infrastructure management much easier. There is no auto-scaling feature in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE; however, NKP offers it. In NKE, we created additional worker nodes and increased CPU and RAM capacity, but it required manual intervention. Concerning policy-driven governance in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, we have the ability to implement RBAC at the cluster level, which helps maintain security by not granting full admin privileges to every end user, thus restricting access effectively.

Read full review

Shamim Alsharif

Performance Test Engineer at TANIM CONSULTING, LLC

Real-time monitoring has improved our banking API performance and supports detailed business transaction analysis

The real-time monitoring is what we can see for anything that is needed in terms of CPU, memory, or the connections or the sessions related. It's real-time monitoring of performance of each of the components, which is what we need and use all the time. It's highly effective, I would say. Infrastructure visibility, transaction monitoring, to check the actual user experience in terms of the response time, MRT and all those things. We do the component monitoring like the API performance and the connections and all those things, but we also do the business process monitoring and business transaction monitoring.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is excellent."

"Nutanix's support is really good."

"We can do a lot of provisioning."

"I would recommend using this product, it's very good."

"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."

"My experience with Nutanix's technical support is excellent."

"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."

"The platform is valuable due to its ease of use and quick deployment capabilities."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] pros

"We have become more proactive rather than reactive."

"The time saved is significant as we have gone from four hours to one hour, which means we are saving a lot of time."

"The good thing with AppDynamics Databases is that it will give you a pretty good overview of the data, all the database-like tables, long-running queries, jobs running on the databases, and the queries that are taking more time. So, it's at a deeper level with all the database functionalities, and you will get that information. So, it's a pretty good tool in that sense."

"It provides a lot of data, so it helps businesses identify their user base."

"Since we have implemented this solution, it is going smooth and we are getting positive feedback from customers, consultants and everybody else."

"The ability to identify the top running queries has been extremely valuable for us."

"With Dynatrace, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is one of the best tools on the market."

"Because of AppDynamics, we came to know where the bottlenecks are in the infrastructure by using the system agent, as well as the JVM agent."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."

"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."

"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."

"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."

"I have issues with the product's interoperability."

"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."

"NKE could benefit from additional features that support more advanced Kubernetes functionalities and configurations."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] cons

"AppDynamics is new to the cloud and could improve its cloud services, they are following a monolithic monitoring approach."

"The biggest room for improvement is related to maintenance of the solution."

"It's a very complex application, and requires almost a full-time person to be in there working on it all the time."

"AppDynamics is really pricey as it requires licenses for every feature."

"We’re having difficulty with the Apache web agent. It seems to be consuming too many resources of AppDynamics."

"AppDynamics Server Monitoring has room for improvement in terms of pricing. If the price could be cheaper, it would be great for both the customer and the integrator. What I'd like to see in the next release of AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a better dashboard for the customer. The dashboard should be more interactive."

"I wouldn't say I am 100% satisfied. There have been times that it fails."

"The monitoring capability could be improved; it does have a monitoring capability, but it's very, very basic."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"It could be a bit lower, but looking at the scalability, functionality, and other things, you can understand why AppDynamics is so expensive as compared to some of the cheaper products that don't have that full single pane of glass they've got. Dynatrace has got three different elements that you need to log into just to get a full view, which is not so good, and because of that, it is a bit cheaper."

"There is an annual cost for the use of this solution."

"It's a very expensive product. Each of the licenses after this month for one server is around $9,000 or $10,000."

"It is expensive. However, our time to recover has been reduced, and this product has helped recuperate costs and provided us with ROI."

"The cost is prohibitive."

"The license fee for Application Analytics is in the range of 2.5 million over three years, with extra fees for service contingencies."

"We have purchased a few licenses for AppDynamics Database Monitoring and the price is high."

"AppDynamics Database Monitoring requires a license for database monitoring and other features, while Dynatrace provides monitoring and other features out of the box without additional costs. Sometimes this makes it more challenging to pitch AppDynamics Database Monitoring to customers, especially because you need to buy a separate license. As an implementer, I have yet to learn about the pricing for AppDynamics Database Monitoring. Pricing is taken care of by the sales team."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

23%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	64
Midsize Enterprise	37
Large Enterprise	205

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

In terms of features, I cannot comment technically, but the real value is the consolidated out-of-the-box solution that Nutanix offers. Nutanix has built great branding and a lot of credibility and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I have experience with OpenShift, Kubernetes, and Nutanix, as we are one of the largest Nutanix resellers in the Middle East. We handle Kubernetes on the cloud as well, so we manage most of the Kub...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I don't have a technical role, but we are a system integrator, so we sell solutions such as OpenShift and Kubernetes as part of the sales team. We are a reseller called eSky IT, and I serve as the ...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

The price is not cheap, however, considering the benefits and the price ratio, I would rate it nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

Based on my experience, some databases like Couchbase, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB require a little bit of enhancement as they are newer and not as widely used as other databases. The limitations are o...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Sysdig Monitor vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 2% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

July 2026

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

July 2026

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

Nutanix Karbon

No data available

Overview

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] offers easy deployment, efficient resource management, and seamless integration with existing infrastructure, supporting virtualization and configurable RBAC.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] simplifies Kubernetes cluster deployment and management, offering robust features such as health checks and seamless upgrades. It integrates with existing systems, supports virtualization, and provides a unified console. Automatic load management and scalability contribute to its stability. Though migrating via VMware poses challenges and documentation updates are needed, potential enhancements include dynamic resource scaling, advanced backup options, and improved disaster recovery. NKE is ideal for microservices, container management, and application modernization, playing a vital role in DevOps settings.

What are the key features of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Easy Deployment: Simplifies cluster setup and management for quick ramp-up.
Resource Allocation: Efficiently allocates computing resources for optimized operations.
Seamless Upgrades: Handles updates without causing downtime.
Integration: Works with existing infrastructure, allowing virtualization support.
Console Management: Offers a single interface for robust management features.

What benefits should users look for in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides a reliable Kubernetes platform with reduced operational costs.
Scalability: Ensures stability and growth alongside increasing demands.
Support Features: Includes robust technical support for a seamless experience.
Efficiency: Enhances workload management in DevOps environments.
Configurable Options: Allows tailored RBAC and scalable virtualization benefits.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] is deployed in industries focusing on microservices and application modernization, serving development to testing environments. It integrates with hardware and API tools, supporting DevOps workloads and infrastructure management. Primarily used on-premises, it supports large-scale application deployment leveraging network capabilities.

Nutanix

Splunk AppDynamics is a comprehensive performance monitoring tool providing end-to-end transaction tracking, real-time monitoring, and a user-friendly interface. With AI-powered features, it enhances operational efficiency and resilience by offering insights into user interactions and infrastructure issues.

Splunk AppDynamics excels in monitoring applications and infrastructure performance, offering extensive support across environments like AWS and cloud. It aids in application performance monitoring, end-user experience, database analysis, and proactive incident detection. Supporting Java, .NET, and other technologies, it provides real-time insights into application health, resource utilization, and transaction tracking, ensuring reliable user experiences. Challenges remain in UI complexity, agent-based architecture, integration with diverse environments, and documentation clarity. Its licensing model is costly, and customer support may be slow. Performance concerns exist in historical data granularity and network visibility.

What features make Splunk AppDynamics stand out?

End-to-End Transaction Tracking: Monitors entire user transactions for comprehensive visibility.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant insights into system performance.
AI-Powered Anomaly Detection: Identifies anomalies with advanced machine learning techniques.
Code-Level Troubleshooting: Diagnoses issues at the code level for precise fixes.
Business Transaction Visibility: Offers detailed views into transaction flow across all system layers.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Splunk AppDynamics?

Improved Application Performance: Enhances system efficiency and reliability.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and issue resolution processes.
Enhanced Business Resilience: Strengthens the ability to adapt to performance challenges.
Seamless User Experiences: Ensures uninterrupted service and user satisfaction.

Organizations in industries like finance and healthcare implement Splunk AppDynamics to monitor critical applications and infrastructure. Its capabilities in transaction tracking and AI-driven insights are crucial for maintaining system reliability, supporting technologies such as Java and .NET, and ensuring optimal resource utilization.

Splunk

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Dynatrace, Datadog and others in Container Monitoring. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Container Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.