OpenText Application Quality Management vs Turnkey Solutions cFactory comparison

OpenText and Turnkey Solutions are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. OpenText is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Turnkey Solutions is ranked #30. OpenText holds a 9.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to Turnkey Solutions’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

5,872 Views
1,762 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Turnkey Solutions cFactory

169 Views
150 Comparison Views

OpenText Application Qualit...

Turnkey Solutions cFactory

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Application Quality Management and Turnkey Solutions cFactory compete in the application testing and quality management domain. Turnkey Solutions cFactory appears to have the upper hand due to its innovative features, despite OpenText's better pricing and support.

Features: OpenText Application Quality Management is recognized for its robust test management capabilities, integration with various third-party tools, and process automation flexibility. In contrast, Turnkey Solutions cFactory stands out with advanced automation features, seamless integration with cloud platforms, and ease of creating and managing testing scripts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Turnkey Solutions cFactory offers a flexible deployment model with cloud and on-premises options, providing strong customer support with dedicated troubleshooting assistance. OpenText, while offering similar deployment options, receives more favorable feedback for customer service responsiveness and support quality, highlighting its superior customer service experience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management presents a competitive setup cost, leading to quicker ROI due to comprehensive support and lower initial expenses. Turnkey Solutions cFactory, with a higher setup cost, justifies this with long-term ROI by maximizing automation efficiency and minimizing manual efforts, focusing on extended value through automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (4th), Quality Management Software (1st)

Turnkey Solutions cFactory

Ranking in Test Management Tools

30th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Design Automation (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 9.0%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turnkey Solutions cFactory is 1.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	9.0%
Turnkey Solutions cFactory	1.3%
Other	89.7%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

Use Turnkey Solutions cFactory?

Leave a review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	162

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

TFS vs Turnkey Solutions cFactory

Compared 28% of the time

More Turnkey Solutions cFactory Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

January 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

January 2026

Download Turnkey Solutions cFactory product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

cFactory

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

TurnKey cFactory software accelerates time to market and eliminates the cost and complexity of test automation. It’s the only intelligent, data-driven framework designed to streamline testing at each stage of the testing process. Reduce your end-to-end business process, web app, UFT, Selenium, functional and regression testing time and costs while maximizing performance and availability of all your applications. Available on the ground or in the cloud.

Turnkey Solutions

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Almac,Xfinity, Merck, Visa, CardinalHealth

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.