OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Original Software Qualify comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared OpenText and Original Software solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #4 in PTT , with an average rating of 7.5, and holds a 7.8% mindshare in the category. Original Software is ranked #29 in ALM , and holds a 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Original Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Performance E...

Read 47 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

6,476 Views
4,792 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Original Software Qualify

Read 1 Original Software Qualify review

1,675 Views
620 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Performance E...

Original Software Qualify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) and Original Software Qualify based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Apache, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Performance Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Performance E...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (4th), Load Testing Tools (4th)

Original Software Qualify

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (29th)

Mindshare comparison

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) and Original Software Qualify aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is designed for Performance Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 7.8%, down 9.3% compared to last year.
Original Software Qualify, on the other hand, focuses on Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites, holds 0.9% mindshare, up 0.5% since last year.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)	7.8%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)	16.8%
Tricentis NeoLoad	14.1%
Other	61.3%

Performance Testing Tools

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Original Software Qualify	0.9%
Jira	11.4%
Microsoft Azure DevOps	9.7%
Other	78.0%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Centralized cloud testing has improved global load generation and real-time performance insights

The most valuable features I have found in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are that everything is online and centralized, so I do not need to go anywhere to check the configuration and everything. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well. The cloud-based load generators in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) have benefited my testing setup because we can generate the load across the globe, which was previously a little bit difficult on the on-premises version. The user interface in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is intuitive and this will be easy to communicate and collaborate amongst the team also because sharing the online URL with the team, they can simply check the analysis and everything.

Read full review

Konstantinos Tasiopoulos

Group Integration Tools Manager at TITAN

Flexible, multifunctional, and stable testing software with good technical support

I've been using the latest version of Original Software Qualify AQM. Over 100 users in our company use Original Software Qualify AQM. We only have two people in charge of its deployment and maintenance. This software is extensively used in our company. Personally, I recommend Original Software Qualify AQM to other people looking into implementing it. You can do a lot of things with this software. The support is very good. The communication is very good, and they also listen to problems raised. They add new features and functionalities as a response to past problems or issues. It's a very good tool and I recommend it. We've seen a return on investment from this software. I'm rating Original Software Qualify AQM a nine out of ten, because of several reasons: It's very good software, it's a supportive company, and we have very good results from it. This software also minimizes the effort of UATs, and it also allows us to deploy whatever we want.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reason we chose it and the most valuable feature is the amount of virtual users we can run in a test; we have run up to 900,000 users."

"Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore."

"The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way."

"The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center."

"The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads."

"The reports are very relevant to the customers’ expectations."

"Even though the cost is expensive, there are good features when compared to all other tools."

"The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I"

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

"You can do a lot of things with this software; the support is very good, the communication is very good, they listen to problems raised, add new features and functionalities as a response to past problems or issues, and we have seen a return on investment from this software."

"Flexible software with multiple functions, e.g. scenario deployment, new entity creation, workflow creation, etc. Technical support for this software is very good."

Cons

"One area for improvement in LoadRunner Cloud, especially for agile models, is its limited support for functional testing alongside its robust non-functional testing capabilities."

"Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."

"This vendor, Micro Focus, is not very good at technical support."

"The initial setup is complex, but that is the nature of the technology."

"We ran into some undocumented limits around the number of concurrent users."

"Its scripting features need improvement."

"Improvements to the reporting would be good."

"I think the product is still immature because we have some problem reaching the mobile center connection related to a proper configuration on our machine."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

"The reporting engine of Original Software Qualify AQM needs to change. It's very difficult to develop complex reports. Its reporting function needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

"This software is moderately priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows it is very high and very costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) can be improved by incorporating code improvements. I would add that it reduces the initial setup complexity, improves the learning curve op...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 12% of the time

PractiTest vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 10% of the time

RadView WebLOAD vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 8% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 7% of the time

Visual Studio Test Professional vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 5% of the time

More Original Software Qualify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

October 2026

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

October 2026

Download Original Software Qualify product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

Qualify

Overview

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

Original Software Qualify is a robust testing solution tailored for businesses seeking efficiency in software quality management. With a focus on comprehensive test management, it streamlines defect tracking and supports collaboration across teams. The platform promotes a seamless testing environment.

Original Software Qualify empowers teams by integrating with various development tools, enhancing collaboration and maintaining consistent quality assurance. It delivers an intuitive approach to test case management and defect resolution. The automation capabilities reduce the time required for testing, enabling teams to focus on critical assessments. Integration compatibility ensures smooth operation within existing frameworks, minimizing disruption during deployment.

What are the key features of Original Software Qualify?

Test Management: Centralizes test cases, enhancing organization and accessibility.
Defect Tracking: Efficiently monitors and resolves defects, improving software reliability.
Automation: Offers automated testing capabilities to expedite processes.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools for streamlined workflow.
Collaboration: Facilitates team collaboration to ensure alignment and uniformity in testing practices.

Why consider user reviews for ROI insights?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual testing hours, optimizing resource allocation.
Quality Improvement: Enhances software quality, lowering long-term maintenance costs.
Speed to Market: Accelerates testing phases, reducing time to release.
Scalability: Supports varying business sizes, accommodating growth.
Risk Mitigation: Identifies potential defects early, reducing post-release issues.

In finance, Original Software Qualify effectively manages complex testing scenarios with a focus on transaction security and compliance. In healthcare, it facilitates rigorous data validation and regulatory adherence, ensuring patient data integrity. These industry applications highlight flexibility and adaptability, fulfilling specific sector requirements.

Original Software

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

CertainTeed, Marston's, Edrington, Ageas, iPERS.

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Apache, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.