No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Core Software Delivery Platform vs Targetprocess comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Software Deli...
Ranking in Value Stream Management Software
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Targetprocess
Ranking in Value Stream Management Software
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Value Stream Management Software category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Software Delivery Platform is 6.0%, down from 22.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 6.5%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Value Stream Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Targetprocess6.5%
OpenText Core Software Delivery Platform6.0%
Other87.5%
Value Stream Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2297841 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Automation Architect at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
A highly stable and flexible solution that provides modules that are far superior to any other tools in the market
It's hard to learn the best practices. It is hard to keep up with changes. There's a lot of great improvements. We don't always know about them. There have been a lot of changes in the suggested uses of the product over the last five years. There are some things that we don't even know about. It would be nice to have an idea of the vision of the use of the product compared to how we're using it. For example, the solution is so customizable that we can create a form and drop half the fields. However, someone else might think the dropped fields are important for AI. I won't be using it because I don't know. So, my results will end up being substandard because of it.
Joseph  Washington - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Target
Visual workflow has improved planning and reporting and now supports data driven decisions
The best features Targetprocess offers include web-based administrators of this application that allow me to do field level mapping in a significant way. It lets us use graphical and custom reports to pinpoint certain trends and I am able to forecast performance. Additionally, program board management, risk stroke dependency management, creating graphs and dashboards, and project governance planning are also great features. Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization because the license cost is low, hence saving a lot of time and cost. Efficiency has been improved. I am able to save approximately three to four hours per project. Also, it has increased levels of cross-team transparency.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is flexible."
"I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality."
"It is a very recommendable tool because it has had a significant positive impact on our organization, and the ability of Targetprocess to integrate with other tools has dramatically increased productivity by cutting down the time to market and project planning by half."
"I have additional thoughts about Targetprocess, as its biggest strengths are that it is highly customizable, can fit the needs of almost any team, it is a robust reporting tool, easy to use and administer, and provides all the functionality an Agile organization would be looking for."
 

Cons

"It is hard to keep up with changes."
"I believe that Targetprocess can be improved in areas such as integration, user experience, and customer support, which is somewhat slow and should be improved."
"One way Targetprocess can be improved is by making self-service in configuring new item types, workflows, and automation easier, as it currently requires us to pay a contractor to do these things, hence being a bit expensive."
"Targetprocess can be improved by enhancing integration."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Value Stream Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
Construction Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Targetprocess?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been very cost-effective. The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
What needs improvement with Targetprocess?
Targetprocess can be improved by enhancing integration. Also, personalization capabilities at every user level should be improved. I would add that it should allow users to navigate easily.
What is your primary use case for Targetprocess?
Targetprocess is a powerful product that is frequently used by the whole organization. The powerful visualization of my workflow is a blessing because it allows me to have a perfect distraction-fre...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, CloudBees, ServiceNow and others in Value Stream Management Software. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.