OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and ZAPTEST are competing products in software testing automation. ZAPTEST holds the upper hand due to its robust features and ease of use, which many users feel justify its cost.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is known for its integration capabilities, intuitive design, and enterprise-oriented scalability. ZAPTEST excels with extensive cross-platform support, advanced scripting features, and flexibility that address diverse testing needs.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its customization options and learning curve, and improve integration with additional tools. ZAPTEST might benefit from refining its high initial cost, expanding its user community support, and better documentation for immediate user queries.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers a streamlined deployment model with dedicated support teams. ZAPTEST provides a straightforward process emphasizing ease of setup and fast resolution times, favoring its simplicity in onboarding new users.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers competitive pricing and significant value through its support, suited for larger organizations. ZAPTEST, while potentially higher in cost, delivers considerable ROI by reducing testing timelines and operational costs, promising greater long-term value.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| ZAPTEST | 0.9% |
| Other | 96.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
