No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
ZAPTEST Logo

ZAPTEST Reviews

Vendor: ZAPTEST
4.2 out of 5

What is ZAPTEST?

Get the report
Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Featured ZAPTEST reviews

ZAPTEST mindshare

Product category:
As of May 2026, the mindshare of ZAPTEST in the Test Automation Tools category stands at 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ZAPTEST1.5%
Tricentis Tosca11.4%
OpenText Functional Testing6.8%
Other80.3%
Test Automation Tools

PeerResearch reports based on ZAPTEST reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryTest Automation ToolsMay 9, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonZAPTEST vs Tricentis ToscaMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonZAPTEST vs Katalon StudioMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonZAPTEST vs Worksoft CertifyMay 9, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.111.4%96%113 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText Functional Testing4.06.8%87%98 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Healthcare Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
University
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
5%
Consumer Goods Company
4%
Legal Firm
2%
Government
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Religious Institution
2%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Retailer
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%

Compare ZAPTEST with alternative products

Learn more about ZAPTEST

ZAPTEST customers

Related questions

 
ZAPTEST Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
System engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0I find ZAPTEST valuable for pre-deployment test automation from UI mock-ups, saving time and money via early, multi-platform testing. Its visual approach is strong, but setup requires skilled staff and it lacks regex support.
Senior Automation Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.5ZAPTEST's OCR feature was game-changing for object identification, allowing me to automate challenging applications. I experienced some .NET identification issues and desire better documentation, but customer support is exceptional.
Quality Assurance and Release at a government with 51-200 employees4.5We find ZAPTEST excellent for automating regression tests, especially with Oracle ERP and old Java, significantly reducing turnaround. Its scripting flexibility and responsive customer service surpass previous solutions like HP UFT, although a global object repository is needed.
Quality Services Contractor at a insurance company with 51-200 employees4.5I appreciate its multi-device testing and mobile app regression, with easy setup and 100% ROI. While I desire better test result visualization, their 10/10 efficient, responsive support teams are excellent.
Enterprise Architecture at a local government with 1,001-5,000 employeesAfter switching from expensive HP products, I found ZAPTEST significantly reduced testing time and costs, enabling faster production cycles. Their excellent support even developed a free load testing plugin, making them a valuable and responsive partner.
Lead Automation Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees4.0I'm very satisfied with this product; it automates difficult features early, even from mock-ups, where others failed. Setup is easy, it's stable, and support is phenomenal. My only request is for more data file types than CSV.
ITG2 at a tech services company4.5We find this product automates any program with excellent object detection and OCR, making testing faster and more stable. Customer service and tech support are superior, though documentation struggles to keep pace with rapid updates.