OpenText Functional Testing vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 98 OpenText Functional Testing reviews

16,684 Views
12,179 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Read 1 Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing and Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] are competing in the software testing category. OpenText Functional Testing takes the lead in features and support, while QA Wizard Pro is advantageous in ease of deployment.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing provides robust automation tools, extensive protocol support, and diverse application integration. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] effectively handles functional and load testing but lacks broader integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing ensures an easy deployment with dedicated customer support, facilitating smooth implementation. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] offers quick, simple installation but limited support options.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing has a higher setup cost but delivers substantial ROI with advanced features and support. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] appeals with lower initial costs, suitable for short-term budgets, though OpenText justifies its price through long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (3rd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (3rd), Test Automation Tools (4th)

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Kevin Copple

Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Has supported faster test execution and increased flexibility while offering room to improve support responsiveness

Reducing the levels of support is something they could continue to improve. They tend to have an entry-level person that may not be as familiar with the product that fields the calls, which creates another day of delay to get to the level that's needed. This is a common practice across most companies where you call, you get the entry-level person, and then they work their way up to help screen calls so that they are more focused.

Read full review

AlonKalangel

DevOps Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability

The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it is your problem. It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time. Any additional request would be put on hold and made to wait for a few seconds. Once the network and infrastructure are loaded to handle the next request, it would proceed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."

"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."

"We have performed 3500 test case automations, and we are able to execute them in just five days, whereas if we were to do this manually, it would take 30 days."

"If one is looking for a software testing tool for functional parameters with an automation approach, they can go for it without any more thinking and discussion."

"Our current project features more than a 1000 manual test cases, which took several days and resources to execute, and now the suite executes in six hours and less than two when run on multiple machines."

"UFT is an expensive tool that can save you a lot of time and effort and provide great value for money if used correctly, but also turn out as ineffective related to value-for-money if used the wrong way."

"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."

"The inside object repository is nice. We can use that and learn it through the ALM connection. That's a good feature. The reporting and smart identification features are also excellent."

More OpenText Functional Testing pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

Cons

"Cost is the biggest issue with UFT. It is not cheap."

"Cross-browser testing feature should be improved."

"The solution does not have proper scripting."

"I’d like to see them improve the number of objects recognized without customization, similar to TestComplete by SmartBear."

"Additionally, there are hanging issues where it becomes unresponsive, which can be improved."

"The initial setup is complex."

"Object identification has room for improvement, to make it more efficient."

"UFT still requires some coding."

More OpenText Functional Testing cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

"Generally, we can say that we have not had an excellent experience with Perforce."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."

"The price is reasonable."

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

More OpenText Functional Testing pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	74

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT One?

I'm more familiar with Functional Testing. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is a different product set that functions as an IDE for writing custom code. We don't leverage that product bec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 20% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

Worksoft Certify vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 27% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

September 2026

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

August 2026

Download Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] is an automated testing tool designed to streamline testing processes for software development teams. Its sophisticated features support efficient and comprehensive test management, ensuring high-quality software delivery.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] offers extensive functionality for software testing that supports both beginners and advanced users. It facilitates script creation, test execution, and result analysis across different scripting environments. QA teams benefit from its flexibility and compatibility, allowing seamless integration into existing workflows.

What are the key features of Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]?

Scriptless Testing: Simplifies test creation through a user-friendly interface.
Cross-Platform Testing: Ensures software reliability across multiple platforms.
Integration Support: Enhances efficiency by integrating with existing tools and systems.
Custom Reporting: Provides detailed insights into test outcomes for informed decision-making.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts, saving time.
Comprehensive Testing: Identifies bugs earlier, minimizing future costs.
Scalability: Accommodates growing testing needs with ease.
Improved Software Quality: Ensures consistent performance and functionality.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] sees widespread use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail due to its ability to handle complex testing scenarios. Its flexibility allows it to meet the demanding requirements of these industries, supporting a wide range of applications and ensuring robust software performance.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.