OpenText Functional Testing vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 98 OpenText Functional Testing reviews

19,772 Views
14,631 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Read 1 Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing and Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] are competing in the software testing category. OpenText Functional Testing takes the lead in features and support, while QA Wizard Pro is advantageous in ease of deployment.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing provides robust automation tools, extensive protocol support, and diverse application integration. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] effectively handles functional and load testing but lacks broader integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing ensures an easy deployment with dedicated customer support, facilitating smooth implementation. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] offers quick, simple installation but limited support options.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing has a higher setup cost but delivers substantial ROI with advanced features and support. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] appeals with lower initial costs, suitable for short-term budgets, though OpenText justifies its price through long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (4th)

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Kevin Copple

Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Has supported faster test execution and increased flexibility while offering room to improve support responsiveness

Reducing the levels of support is something they could continue to improve. They tend to have an entry-level person that may not be as familiar with the product that fields the calls, which creates another day of delay to get to the level that's needed. This is a common practice across most companies where you call, you get the entry-level person, and then they work their way up to help screen calls so that they are more focused.

Read full review

AlonKalangel

DevOps Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability

The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it is your problem. It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time. Any additional request would be put on hold and made to wait for a few seconds. Once the network and infrastructure are loaded to handle the next request, it would proceed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One advantage of Micro Focus UFT is that it is more compatible with SAP, Desktop ECC SAP, than S/4HANA."

"My advice to anybody who is considering this product is that it integrates well into your environment, is easy to use, easy to maintain, and makes your development efforts more efficient."

"The solution is in the top list for automatic functional testing."

"The scalability of Micro Focus UFT One is good."

"The fact that it works with a vast number of technologies works for us because our internal customers use the tool for testing a lot of different applications."

"The most valuable features are its support for multiple technologies, ease of coding, object repository, and ability to design our own framework. The recording playback feature allows those unfamiliar with coding to use the tool."

"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."

"Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users."

More OpenText Functional Testing pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

Cons

"The solution is 70-80% stable. Stability really depends on the servers or the license which we have installed."

"It’s in the middle and not always 100% reliable."

"It needs better compatibility with Chrome and Safari, which would lead to this being a better product."

"Getting it to interact with ALM nicely has been a challenge for us sometimes."

"It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS."

"They need to reduce the licensing cost. There's pushback from customers because of the cost."

"Micro Focus UFT One could benefit from creating modules that are more accessible to non-technical users. Without a developer background or at least basic knowledge of VBScript, using Micro Focus UFT One may not be feasible for everyone. This is something that Micro Focus, now owned by OpenText, should consider in order to cater to business professionals as well. While Micro Focus UFT One does have a recording function, it still requires a certain level of IT proficiency to create effective automation, which may be challenging for those outside of the technical field."

"There could be improvements in report export features similar to SmartBear."

More OpenText Functional Testing cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

"Generally, we can say that we have not had an excellent experience with Perforce."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

"The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

"It's an expensive solution."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

More OpenText Functional Testing pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	74

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT One?

I'm more familiar with Functional Testing. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is a different product set that functions as an IDE for writing custom code. We don't leverage that product bec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 20% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 4% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

Worksoft Certify vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

October 2026

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] is an automated testing tool designed to streamline testing processes for software development teams. Its sophisticated features support efficient and comprehensive test management, ensuring high-quality software delivery.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] offers extensive functionality for software testing that supports both beginners and advanced users. It facilitates script creation, test execution, and result analysis across different scripting environments. QA teams benefit from its flexibility and compatibility, allowing seamless integration into existing workflows.

What are the key features of Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]?

Scriptless Testing: Simplifies test creation through a user-friendly interface.
Cross-Platform Testing: Ensures software reliability across multiple platforms.
Integration Support: Enhances efficiency by integrating with existing tools and systems.
Custom Reporting: Provides detailed insights into test outcomes for informed decision-making.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts, saving time.
Comprehensive Testing: Identifies bugs earlier, minimizing future costs.
Scalability: Accommodates growing testing needs with ease.
Improved Software Quality: Ensures consistent performance and functionality.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] sees widespread use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail due to its ability to handle complex testing scenarios. Its flexibility allows it to meet the demanding requirements of these industries, supporting a wide range of applications and ensuring robust software performance.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.