OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

The compared OpenText and Microsoft solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #5 in PTT , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 8.8% mindshare in the category. Microsoft is ranked #10 in FT , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Performance E...

Read 45 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

2,674 Views
2,193 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

1,602 Views
753 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Performance E...

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Perforce, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Performance Testing Tools Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.4

Users report cost savings and improved clarity with OpenText Core Performance Engineering, citing significant annual reductions in testing expenses.

Sentiment score

6.8

Visual Studio Test Professional boosts efficiency and productivity with cost-saving benefits, significantly enhancing development environments and quality.

LoadRunner Cloud helps with risk elimination by reducing performance degradation in production, ensuring a better end-user experience.

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.4

Opinions on OpenText Core Performance Engineering's support are mixed, with praise for customer service but issues with response times.

Sentiment score

6.8

Customers appreciate Visual Studio Test Professional's support, though some highlight navigation challenges and delays reaching knowledgeable staff.

I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

OpenText Core Performance Engineering scales efficiently for varied needs, handling up to two million users, with notable flexibility and support.

Sentiment score

7.4

Visual Studio Test Professional is highly scalable, adaptable, and supports large teams, though some find licensing costs a concern.

It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.

Saswata Dhar

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

As a small company, we primarily test 1,500 concurrent users and sometimes face issues such as load balancer problems.

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

<p>OpenText Core Performance Engineering is reliable with minor issues, quickly resolved by responsive R&D and customer support teams.</p>

Sentiment score

7.9

Visual Studio Test Professional is stable with high ratings, minor bugs, and reliable updates, despite occasional third-party integration issues.

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.

Saswata Dhar

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Room For Improvement

OpenText Core Performance Engineering struggles with load patterns, reporting, network simulation, support speed, UI design, and agile integration.

Visual Studio Test Professional needs better integration, user-friendliness, scalability, modern features, and improved performance and documentation.

The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

It would also be convenient if there were options to convert scripts from competitor tools like NeoLoad to LoadRunner.

Saswata Dhar

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

I expect an improvement in the cloud location offering to better serve local applications, particularly to enhance testing accuracy for users in regions like Thailand.

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Setup Cost

OpenText Core Performance Engineering provides flexible, usage-based pricing, supporting multiple protocols, justifying costs for enterprise-level performance testing.

Visual Studio Test Professional's pricing is high, yet valued for its functionality, offering free and professional licensing options.

It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

The price is expensive.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Valuable Features

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable, easy-to-use load testing with integration, automation, anomaly detection, and no maintenance required.

Visual Studio Test Professional offers robust integration, user-friendly tools, and customization for efficient cross-platform development and team collaboration.

In the standalone LoadRunner analysis, I can merge graphs or set granular filters to obtain custom reports.

Saswata Dhar

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

We can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times.

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

Its LoadRunner functionality allows us to record a solution's networking protocol and replay them.

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

It supports cross-platform functionality.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

We have a retrospective in our auto projects that we are using frequently to get lessons learned, what went well, and what is going wrong.

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Performance E...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (5th), Load Testing Tools (6th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (10th), Test Management Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is designed for Performance Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 8.8%, up 8.4% compared to last year.
Visual Studio Test Professional, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 0.6% since last year.

Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)	8.8%
Apache JMeter	12.1%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)	12.1%
Other	67.0%

Performance Testing Tools

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	1.4%
Tricentis Tosca	12.9%
BrowserStack	7.5%
Other	78.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

User-friendly features facilitate monitoring while support could be more responsive

I am satisfied with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as a product, but the ticket resolution time is concerning. The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations. Compared to previous support, I notice that while experts previously resolved issues immediately, current experts take more time to resolve issues, which is the main challenge we are facing. They are now lacking regional support, which takes more time than it used to. My suggestions for improvements to OpenText LoadRunner Cloud would be to have specific experts available who can resolve issues more quickly, as delays can impact project timelines significantly.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Performing Arts

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner. The hourly usage model allows cost-saving when used rightly.

See all answers

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 19% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 14% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

January 2026

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

No data available

Overview

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Perforce, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.