Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

The compared OpenText and Microsoft solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #6 in PTT , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 9.2% mindshare in the category. Microsoft is ranked #7 in FT , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
OpenText Core Performance E...
Read 45 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews
  • 2,648 Views
  • 2,277 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Read 52 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews
  • 997 Views
  • 399 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Perforce, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Performance Testing Tools Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Performance Testing Tools
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Users report cost savings and improved clarity with OpenText Core Performance Engineering, citing significant annual reductions in testing expenses.
Sentiment score
7.3
Visual Studio Test Professional boosts productivity and ROI, enhancing development speed and quality, while varying ROI across companies.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
LoadRunner Cloud helps with risk elimination by reducing performance degradation in production, ensuring a better end-user experience.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Opinions on OpenText Core Performance Engineering's support are mixed, with praise for customer service but issues with response times.
Sentiment score
7.1
Visual Studio Test Professional's support is well-rated for responsiveness, knowledgeable staff, and helpful resources, despite navigation challenges.
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
Jyoti Ranjan Behera - PeerSpot reviewerAphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewerCharlesChang - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Core Performance Engineering scales efficiently for varied needs, handling up to two million users, with notable flexibility and support.
Sentiment score
7.5
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly scalable, effectively supporting various team sizes and projects despite cost and infrastructure considerations.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
As a small company, we primarily test 1,500 concurrent users and sometimes face issues such as load balancer problems.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
GS
SD
Jyoti Ranjan Behera - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
<p>OpenText Core Performance Engineering is reliable with minor issues, quickly resolved by responsive R&amp;D and customer support teams.</p>
Sentiment score
7.9
Visual Studio Test Professional is generally stable, with updates enhancing reliability, though occasional performance issues are reported.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText Core Performance Engineering struggles with load patterns, reporting, network simulation, support speed, UI design, and agile integration.
Visual Studio Test Professional needs improved performance, integration, usability, compatibility, and support for automation and web application testing.
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
It would also be convenient if there were options to convert scripts from competitor tools like NeoLoad to LoadRunner.
I expect an improvement in the cloud location offering to better serve local applications, particularly to enhance testing accuracy for users in regions like Thailand.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
Jyoti Ranjan Behera - PeerSpot reviewer
SD
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewerCharlesChang - PeerSpot reviewerALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewerVaibhav Kaneria - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

OpenText Core Performance Engineering provides flexible, usage-based pricing, supporting multiple protocols, justifying costs for enterprise-level performance testing.
Visual Studio Test Professional is costly but offers competitive value, priced at $52 monthly per user, with multi-user discounts.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report
The price is expensive.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
GS
CharlesChang - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable, easy-to-use load testing with integration, automation, anomaly detection, and no maintenance required.
Visual Studio Test Professional excels in code testing, user interface, integration, debugging, and scalability for efficient software development.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines.
We can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times.
Another valuable aspect is the option to use JMX files, similar to JMeter scripts, with LoadRunner.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewerJyoti Ranjan Behera - PeerSpot reviewer
SD
CharlesChang - PeerSpot reviewerALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Performance E...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (6th), Load Testing Tools (6th)
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (7th), Test Management Tools (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is designed for Performance Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 9.2%, up 8.5% compared to last year.
Visual Studio Test Professional, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 0.9% mindshare, up 0.6% since last year.
Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)9.2%
Apache JMeter16.4%
Tricentis NeoLoad13.8%
Other60.6%
Performance Testing Tools
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional0.9%
Tricentis Tosca18.5%
BrowserStack10.2%
Other70.4%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Jyoti Ranjan Behera - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly features facilitate monitoring while support could be more responsive
I am satisfied with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as a product, but the ticket resolution time is concerning. The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations. Compared to previous support, I notice that while experts previously resolved issues immediately, current experts take more time to resolve issues, which is the main challenge we are facing. They are now lacking regional support, which takes more time than it used to. My suggestions for improvements to OpenText LoadRunner Cloud would be to have specific experts available who can resolve issues more quickly, as delays can impact project timelines significantly.
Read full review
CharlesChang - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable performance and libraries but needs compatibility improvements
We use Visual Studio Test Professional to develop our internal applications for our company The performance of Visual Studio Test Professional is valuable. Additionally, there are many libraries that I can use, and it supports cross-platform functionality. Visual Studio Test Professional is…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
7%
Insurance Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise29
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?
I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?
One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner. The hourly usage model allows cost-saving when used rightly.
See all answers
What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?
The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions. This feature would save time by providing direct assi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Compared 28% of the time
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Compared 21% of the time
BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Compared 16% of the time
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Compared 16% of the time
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Compared 5% of the time
More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 22% of the time
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 20% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 17% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 16% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 15% of the time
More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
August 2025
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reportDownload OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report
Buyer's Guide
Visual Studio Test Professional
August 2025
Visual Studio Test Professional reportDownload Visual Studio Test Professional product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?
  • Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
  • Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
  • Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
  • Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
  • Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.
What benefits should users consider in reviews?
  • Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
  • Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
  • Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
  • Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
  • Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText
Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Buyer's Guide
Performance Testing Tools
September 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Perforce, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.