OpenText Silk Test vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Worksoft are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0, while Worksoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to Worksoft’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

3,255 Views
2,181 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 89 Worksoft Certify reviews

8,395 Views
5,793 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and Worksoft Certify are competitors in the software testing automation market. Based on our data comparisons, Worksoft Certify seems to have an upper hand due to its advanced features and seamless integration capabilities with various enterprise ecosystems.

Features: OpenText Silk Test provides robust cross-platform testing, script sharing across projects for enhanced test maintainability, and a strong object model for windows declarations. Worksoft Certify offers model-based testing, automated script generation, and the ability to perform end-to-end validation across application landscapes, which reduces manual testing efforts significantly.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve in easing technical requirements for deployment, enhancing the speed of test execution, and expanding integration with non-traditional platforms. Worksoft Certify could benefit from refining its user interface further, reducing the complexity of automation setup for non-SAP applications, and optimizing documentation output to be less extensive while maintaining detail.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test offers straightforward installation but requires a certain level of technical knowledge offset by their reliable customer support. Worksoft Certify provides a seamless deployment experience with strong support services that guide users in fully leveraging its capabilities, offering an advantage in non-technical implementations.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test is generally more budget-friendly with reasonable setup costs, providing substantial ROI for small to mid-scale businesses. Worksoft Certify, although more expensive initially, delivers a compelling ROI through efficient automation capabilities, facilitating long-term savings for large enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (9th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 2.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 3.0%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Worksoft Certify	3.0%
OpenText Silk Test	2.0%
Other	95.0%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Muddisetty Arun Kumar

WorkSoft Certified Automation Engineer at Qualesce

Automation has delivered strong ROI with AI-driven test prioritization and parallel reporting

The best feature of Worksoft Certify is the automatic report generation. Unlike traditional tools like Selenium or Java-based frameworks where reporting often requires custom coding, Certify handles this natively. We are currently utilizing the 14.5 version, which has modernized these capabilities, though we frequently manage backward compatibility for clients still running on the 12.x version series.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting, as you get a single frame of reporting across all the various tests and the program is very user-friendly."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"SilkTest is best for desktop applications and good for web applications also with the Open agent."

"The Silk4J feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"It speeds up testing efforts."

"The OCR recognition is great, way over Sikulix or Robot Framework."

"It drastically reduced our manual regression efforts that is difficult to achieve in Agile model."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

"The biggest feature is the fact that it's codeless, which makes it vastly usable by more people who are not even acquainted with IT at all."

"Worksoft is a good tool to start with as it is a codeless tool."

"We get feedback from all areas that the return on investment is there, not just regarding time savings but also cost reduction."

"Worksoft Certify has good integration capabilities with third-party tools."

"Certify integrates with other tools and it works very well with other machine testing applications."

"During our yearly upgrades, we have now gotten them down to ten days or less. We have Worksoft run all our integration tests, where it used to take probably six weeks to do that manually."

"It saves us time, makes it so we are not as worried about changes which are going into the system, and we know that we have nightly runs to ensure that things are working."

"We are able to scale up the testing and to address more business-driven projects using Worksoft, which would not be possible with any other tools."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"The pricing could be improved."

"At the moment, when we are trying to use this tool, we are finding quite a few compatibility issues between the tool and the applications on the test. We wouldn't consider it perfectly stable for that reason."

"Implementing a better integration with Git. It was extremely painful to implement the link from Silk Central to Git."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"Need to improve online documentation, community and forums to share issues encountered and solutions."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"At that time, we never had good technical support in Bangalore."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

"The stability needs help. This is main thing that needs help, and if it's not the stability, then it's Worksoft's ability to respond to issues."

"Performance on the web UI part, especially with some of the more comprehensive Fiori features, like the complex tables that are being used, could be improved. In those cases we have noticed a lot of execution-time increase with regards to the Certify solution."

"Certify is integrated with Solution Manager, but this integration could be easier."

"The definitions for the objects need to be automated. They need to be recognized automatically by Worksoft Certify instead of changing them back and forth manually. This is also something that Worksoft is currently working on."

"It uses a sizeable space for its database, therefore requires a regular cleanup in the server's space."

"Reportings are not user-friendly."

"They have a scheduler in Execution Manager, but it is not customizable. Its UI needs a lot of improvement. The lights-out testing is a bit difficult with that particular tool, and it needs a lot of improvement. Of course, there are so many integration options with Worksoft for execution, but when it comes to Execution Manager, which is their own tool, there is a lot of scope for improvement."

"One feature that we have been asking for has been to treat tests as code and store the source code for tests in a configuration management tool. Right now, for version control of testing, it's all internally within the tool. If we have a test of a business process and want to revive that test, our methodology now is purely manual work. We go into the tool, create a copy of the existing test, and call the next one: v2. Now, we have two of them and the only way you can tell them apart is by its naming convention."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"Worksoft Capture 2.0 can help our customers to accelerate their automation development at least 40 percent faster than any other commercial tools available in the market."

"By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool."

"I don't have much idea about the pricing, but it is a licensed tool, and it is somewhat costly."

"The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP."

"We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance."

"This solution is expensive."

"We save probably 50 percent of our time. The tool does what it's supposed to do, and we are able to actually work."

"We have seen that the initial Worksoft implementation has helped our customers reduce their testing cycle time by 50 percent. With further continuous improvement, we have seen cycle time reduced up to 75 percent. That is the level of productivity achieved using Worksoft Certify."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Construction Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

I am not certain about the pricing of Worksoft Certify. What I heard from my peers is that it is costly, and clients will be investing more money in this software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Worksoft Certify?

Based on my experience working in Worksoft Certify and this web application, there are several things that do not work as expected in Worksoft.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 6% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 14% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 12% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 5% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Qualibrate vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

August 2026

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

No data available

Overview

OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.

OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.

What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?

Scripting and Recording Capabilities: Integrates with Visual Studio for efficient script creation.
Cross-Browser Testing: Supports multiple browsers ensuring comprehensive coverage.
GUI Object Recognition: Enhances automation accuracy with reliable object identification.
Multi-Language Support: Facilitates diverse testing environments.
Robust Reporting: Detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes.
SAP Testing Functionality: Optimizes SAP project performance.

What benefits can users expect from OpenText Silk Test?

Enhanced Test Efficiency: Streamlines automation processes for faster results.
Comprehensive Test Management: Manages test cases systematically for improved organization.
Improved Accuracy in Automation: Reduces errors with precise object recognition.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities.
Performance Testing Integration: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks efficiently.

OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.

OpenText

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.