OpsRamp vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications comparison

OpsRamp and Broadcom are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. OpsRamp is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.8. OpsRamp holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of OpsRamp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpsRamp

Read 13 OpsRamp reviews

5,112 Views
3,783 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Read 14 VMware Aria Operations for Applications reviews

5,709 Views
3,197 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpsRamp

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

VMware Aria Operations for Applications and OpsRamp compete in IT operations management. VMware Aria seems to have the upper hand in analytics and data-driven insights, while OpsRamp excels in infrastructure monitoring and management.

Features: VMware Aria Operations for Applications provides robust application performance monitoring, predictive analytics, and scalability across cloud environments. OpsRamp features extensive infrastructure monitoring, seamless integration, and efficient incident management.

Room for Improvement: VMware Aria could enhance its infrastructure oversight, flexibility, and reduce deployment time for diverse environments. OpsRamp may improve its analytics depth, application-specific insights, and streamline cloud-specific monitoring.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Aria offers a streamlined cloud-based deployment with strong support for quick integration into existing systems. OpsRamp provides a versatile deployment model focusing on flexibility and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Aria involves higher upfront costs but offers significant long-term ROI through deep analytics and performance improvements. OpsRamp has cost-effective setup enabling rapid ROI through integrated infrastructure management and reduced operational overhead.

To learn more, read our detailed OpsRamp vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpsRamp vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpsRamp

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), AIOps (10th)

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (16th), Container Monitoring (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of OpsRamp is 1.2%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Aria Operations for Applications is 1.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Aria Operations for Applications	1.6%
OpsRamp	1.2%
Other	97.2%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer2732427

System Integration Advisor at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Provides robust infrastructure monitoring with excellent integrations and alert predictions but needs improved AIOps capabilities

If we treat OpsRamp as an infrastructure monitoring tool, there are many positive aspects. However, when viewed as an AIOps tool, there are numerous potential additions. Currently, it performs infrastructure monitoring but has limited capability in application monitoring, which needs improvement. They are introducing observability as a feature where metrics, logs, and traces can be implemented, but this is currently in a primitive state that can grow over time. The platform is very stable, and the UI is excellent. However, regarding AIOps features, enhancements could be made to provide more value, such as dynamic thresholding and other capabilities that competitor tools have, such as LogicMonitor.

Read full review

Ajay Shukla

Consultant at HCLTech

Automation and insightful diagnostics elevate operations while improvements are welcome

The new version 8.18 has brought significant improvements. The main purpose of using this tool is having a single console to manage all entities. The cloud integration capabilities, including private, public, and hybrid, are already well-implemented. The ability to manage multiple vCenters across different geographical locations is very effective. The new Skyline health feature and certificate and licensing management are particularly useful improvements. The dashboard's overview tab provides comprehensive information about current vCenter status, resizable amounts, reclamation opportunities, anomalies, diagnostics, licensing, and certificates. However, there is room for improvement in application analysis. The current functionality lacks detailed monitoring at the kernel level, focusing mainly on CPU, memory, and storage matrices. Enhanced application monitoring capabilities, including tracking downtime for specific types of applications such as transactional or e-commerce applications, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main differences between OpsRamp and other solutions are the artificial intelligence and the ease of implementation and scaling."

"The technical support is fantastic, and they are fast to respond."

"It is a pretty stable solution."

"The most valuable feature of this solution in my experience, is that the available reporting is quite accurate."

"We don't have to monitor each resource because OpsRamp does the monitoring for us and generates alerts based on the thresholds, so we can automatically notify customers of any spikes on their virtual machines."

"What I appreciate most about OpsRamp is that while many tools in the market provide standard monitoring, OpsRamp stands out as a differentiator by providing AIOps features, including correlation, deduplication, and automation where we can run RBA scripts on top of created alerts."

"Predictive analysis is a valued feature."

"The feature that we have found most useful are the dashboards, which can be built in minutes using this solution, allowing multiple products, thresholds, or any given required metric to be seen in a single area."

More OpsRamp pros

"No issues with stability."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation."

"The solution provides single-console management for multiple VMware environments and cloud integrations, whether hybrid, private, or public cloud."

"I gladly recommend VMware Aria Operations for Applications because it is cost effective and has commendable AI response capabilities."

"Using Wavefront, we have been able to reduce the complexity of our pipeline."

"We haven't had any issues with stability."

"The stability of Aria Operations for Applications has improved significantly over the years."

"People are very pleased with the implementation."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications pros

Cons

"OpsRamp had shortcomings associated with its network capabilities."

"OpsRamp could improve the critical alerts. We have been receiving some false alerts when monitoring. For example, the alert shows the site is down, but when we try to do manual access to the URL, it's accessible."

"This is an emerging tool and they have tried to consolidate everything not always with success."

"Technical support should be improved, and I have noticed other areas in OpsRamp that could be improved or enhanced."

"We would like this solution to be developed into a full CMP tool, so that we are able to use a single product for all of our cloud management needs."

"There is definitely room for improvement."

"I would like to see two things. The first is a self-service portal for the cloud, any cloud deployments, and the second is maturity validation towards ITSM, internalizing OpsRamp TSM. As a result, instead of integrating with more mature tools similar to ServiceNow, people will use OpsRamp."

"What's lacking in OpsRamp is process automation, and if there is, I wish there could be more of it, other than just spikes, or it would be better if the alerts can be generated based on different matrices."

More OpsRamp cons

"They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us."

"They just need more capability. A few areas still need more enhancements in the technology capability space."

"The solution could be expensive, which might be a limiting factor."

"Its billing model is consumption-based. I understand the consumption-based model, but it is not necessarily easy to estimate and guess how many points or how much we are going to consume on a specific application up until we get to that point. So, for us, it would be helpful to have more insights or predictability into what we can expect from a cost perspective if we are starting to use specific features. This can potentially also drive our consumption a bit more."

"They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people."

"The main problem I have is that the license cost is very high."

"However, it is still not a very mature product."

"It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have any idea about the licensing cost for OpsRamp, but I just know that its pricing is based on the resource count for each tenant."

"You pay it for a year and you'll have full access to the entire platform, not only for monitoring and alerting, you will have access to the entire platform, and whatever technology they develop will be made available to you."

"There is an annual licensing fee to use OpsRamp."

"OpsRamp is a cost-effective solution."

"I don't have the details. In our case, there is a mixture in place. We have production usage, and we are also doing training for VMware. So, we also have a training instance. It is worth the money you would spend on it. That's because if you were to build all of this yourself by using some of the open source tools, then you would need a lot of time."

"I would rate the pricing as three out of five."

"Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

"The licensing costs are very high, particularly when you consider that we have to purchase a level 1 license for every integration, such as the load balancer, HAProxy, and the MSSP. And if you want to use vSAN, that's another license. Then, of course, Tanzu Observability has its own separate license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpsRamp?

I share the impression that OpsRamp pricing is fair; it does not strike me as expensive, and the licensing model is clear enough.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpsRamp?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpsRamp?

Currently, my use case for OpsRamp is using it as an infrastructure monitoring tool for customers, where we can provide infrastructure monitoring as a platform. We can have AI appended to those mon...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

The solution includes cost drivers that can be configured according to your environment. You can input server-wise, CPU-wise, storage, and memory costs per hour or day. Once cost drivers are provid...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

I have been involved in several projects where I had to implement automation and monitoring alerting. I performed automation using VMware Aria Operations for Applications. There is an automation ta...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs OpsRamp

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs OpsRamp

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpsRamp

Compared 7% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs OpsRamp

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs OpsRamp

Compared 5% of the time

More OpsRamp Competitors

Datadog vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpsRamp

April 2026

Download OpsRamp product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Aria Operations for Applications

April 2026

VMware Aria Operations for Applications report

Download VMware Aria Operations for Applications product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tanzu Observability, Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability

Overview

OpsRamp offers a comprehensive IT management platform that enhances business operations through monitoring automation, AIOps, and integration capabilities.

OpsRamp provides a single pane of glass for hybrid infrastructure management, integrating with tools like Zendesk to streamline operations. With predictive analytics and AIOps features such as root cause analysis, it significantly improves IT efficiency. The platform's machine learning, event correlation, and personalized dashboards improve user experience. However, users have noted scalability issues, interface limitations, and patch management inconsistencies, with room for enhancement in network capabilities and ITSM maturity.

What features define OpsRamp?

Single Pane of Glass: Enables seamless monitoring of all IT assets in one dashboard.
Event Correlation: Reduces noise by filtering events and highlighting critical incidents.
Integration Capability: Connects with tools like Zendesk to boost collaboration.
Predictive Analytics: Offers insights through machine learning to anticipate IT issues.
AIOps Automation: Facilitates root cause analysis and automated incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider from OpsRamp reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlined operations through integration and automation.
Improved Collaboration: Better coordination via multi-tenant architecture and shared dashboards.
Increased Accuracy: Machine learning features provide precise reporting and analysis.
Operational Cost Savings: Tools consolidation and predictive features reduce expenses.

OpsRamp is widely implemented for managing and automating IT infrastructure across sectors. Enterprises apply it for Azure infrastructure management, resource threshold setting, and generating alerts. It supports digital transformation through incident management, tools consolidation, and leveraging AI for IT operations, facilitating network and storage device onboarding for customer environments.

OpsRamp

VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is a powerful tool for monitoring and analyzing the performance and availability of applications and infrastructure in real-time.

With its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, visualizing and analyzing data becomes effortless. The real-time alerting system ensures timely issue resolution, while scalability and a user-friendly interface provide a seamless experience for smooth operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Epsilon, CloudBrix, GreenPages, NIIT Technologies

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Databricks 4. DigitalOcean 5. Equinix 6. Fidelity Investments 7. Google 8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 9. Honeywell 10. IBM 11. Intel 12. JetBlue Airways 13. LinkedIn 14. Lyft 15. Mastercard 16. Microsoft 17. MongoDB 18. Netflix 19. Nvidia 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Pinterest 23. Qualcomm 24. Red Hat 25. Salesforce 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Square 29. TMobile 30. Twitter 31. Uber 32. VMware

Buyer's Guide

OpsRamp vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

April 2026

Free Report: OpsRamp vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Find out what your peers are saying about OpsRamp vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpsRamp vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.