Oracle Access Manager vs Safe-T Secure Application Access comparison

Oracle and Safe-T are both solutions in the Access Management category. Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.3, while Safe-T is ranked #31. Oracle holds a 2.0% mindshare in AM, compared to Safe-T’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Safe-T users who would recommend it.

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

1,300 Views
1,209 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Safe-T Secure Application A...

Read 8 Safe-T Secure Application Access reviews

832 Views
283 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Safe-T Secure Application A...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Oracle Access Manager and Safe-T Secure Application Access are competing identity and access management solutions. Safe-T Secure Application Access has an edge in feature set and performance, while Oracle Access Manager is noted for its support and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Oracle Access Manager is known for its scalability, strong integration capabilities, and effective customer support. Safe-T Secure Application Access is praised for its robust security features, ease of integration, and superior performance.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Access Manager could improve its setup process, offer faster updates, and enhance user interface design. Safe-T Secure Application Access users seek better documentation, more comprehensive reporting features, and a user-friendly interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Access Manager's deployment is complex, requiring extensive customization and professional support, but its customer service is highly rated. Safe-T Secure Application Access offers an easier deployment process with straightforward configuration, though its customer service has room for improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Access Manager is considered cost-effective and offers satisfactory ROI, despite potentially high initial setup costs. Safe-T Secure Application Access, while more expensive, is seen to offer good value due to its superior features and strong security, justifying the investment for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Access Manager vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Safe-T Secure Application A...

Ranking in Access Management

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (43rd), ZTNA (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.0%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safe-T Secure Application Access is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Access Manager	2.0%
Safe-T Secure Application Access	0.9%
Other	97.1%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

SurajShah

Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers strong support and consistent updates improve security features

It is a heavyweight application. The product deployment and installation takes time, and the environment details are complex. ForgeRock is very quick to deploy on Tomcat, but Oracle Access Manager must be deployed on WebLogic, a heavyweight server. You cannot deploy Oracle Access Manager on Tomcat. If an organization has sufficient budget to spend on servers, then it is useful. For organizations that do not want to spend too much money on Oracle Access Manager, maintenance and upgrades take time, whereas with ForgeRock, that is the opposite as fewer resources are required. Being a heavyweight application, it will take more time for deployment and installation compared to ForgeRock or Okta. Okta is cloud-based, so it does not take much time. ForgeRock on-premise only needs deployment on a Tomcat server, making it less complex as it is a lightweight application.

Read full review

it_user787671

Network and Security Engineer

Needs to be easier to configure and to display logs more simply

We use only it for scanning files for viruses. That's the only feature we use in this product It needs to be easier to configure, it should be something that's working well with other sources. It should be something that allows me to see the logs simply. One to three years. Sometimes it doesn't…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market."

"The product supports customization."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."

"The solution is able to save time and resources for my clients."

"The product allows customization via custom code."

"Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"

"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."

"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."

"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."

Cons

"Customer Service: Poor. The EBS Access Gate support was delivered as a patch and support was not able to solve various problems, which I believe to be attributes to more current versions of OAM and WebLogic not being backwards compatible with the documented solution."

"The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive."

"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."

"To improve Oracle Access Manager, they should consider integrating more policies and enhancing automation, especially in managing server load and cache cleanup."

"In other products, we can customize on the GUI end, whereas in Oracle, we need to take a backup of the JAR file and then customize it...and during this process, sometimes the WebLogic admin console will go down, which will impact the process."

"I suggest Oracle make the integration process for non-Oracle applications as straightforward and easy as it is for Oracle applications."

"There are problems with stability."

"Sometimes if a session takes too long, you have to log in again."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."

"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is a little expensive."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"The tool is affordable."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 19% of the time

Okta Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 12% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

CyberArk Identity vs Safe-T Secure Application Access

Compared 19% of the time

Appgate SDP vs Safe-T Secure Application Access

Compared 16% of the time

Okta Platform vs Safe-T Secure Application Access

Compared 16% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Safe-T Secure Application Access

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Safe-T Secure Application Access

Compared 9% of the time

More Safe-T Secure Application Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

March 2026

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Safe-T Secure Application Access

February 2026

Download Safe-T Secure Application Access product report

Also Known As

No data available

Safe-T SDA, Safe-T, Safe-T Software-Defined Access

Overview

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

Safe-T is a provider of Zero Trust Access solutions which mitigate attacks on enterprises’ business-critical services and sensitive data, while ensuring uninterrupted business continuity.

Safe-T’s cloud and on-premises solutions ensure that an organization’s access use cases, whether into the organization or from the organization out to the internet, are secured according to the “validate first, access later” philosophy of Zero Trust.

This means that no one is trusted by default from inside or outside the network, and verification is required from everyone trying to gain access to resources on the network or in the cloud.

Safe-T’s wide range of access solutions reduce organizations’ attack surface and improve their ability to defend against modern cyberthreats. As an additional layer of security, our integrated business-grade global proxy solution cloud service enables smooth and efficient traffic flow, interruption-free service, unlimited concurrent connections, instant scaling and simple integration with our services.

With Safe-T’s patented reverse-access technology and proprietary routing technology, organizations of all size and type can secure their data, services and networks against internal and external threats.

At Safe-T, we empower enterprises to safely migrate to the cloud and enable digital transformation.

Safe-T

Sample Customers

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Government of Israel, eviCore Healthcore, Glen Imaging, Sarin, LBG, Rollomatic, Boegli-Gravures SA, Banque Heritage, Groupe Minoteries, Temenos, ZEK, RLM Finsbury, Harel Insurance, Meitav Dash

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access

March 2026

Free Report: Oracle Access Manager vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Access Manager vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.