Top 10 Safe-T Secure Application Access Alternatives

Name: Safe-T Secure Application Access
Brand: Safe-T
Rating: 3.9 (8 reviews)

Vendor: Safe-T

3.9 out of 5

8 reviews
85% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Safe-T Secure Application Access Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Safe-T Secure Application Access based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Okta Platform, and OpenVPN Access Server. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Safe-T Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Safe-T, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Safe-T Secure Application Access offers robust security and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Prisma Access provides a comprehensive solution with advanced features and integration capabilities, justifying its higher cost for those seeking extensive functionality and superior customer support.

Download Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report

Pricing

Safe-T Secure Application Access has minimal setup costs, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Safe-T Secure Application Access has minimal setup costs, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher initial investment.

Okta Platform

4.3 out of 5

Okta Platform

4.3 out of 5

Okta Platform offers comprehensive identity management and seamless integration, making it suitable for broad usability and flexibility. In comparison, Safe-T Secure Application Access targets environments requiring advanced security with robust data-path capabilities, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing enhanced security controls.

Download Okta Platform vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report

Pricing

Okta Platform requires significant setup costs, while Safe-T Secure Application Access offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Okta Platform requires significant setup costs, while Safe-T Secure Application Access offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

OpenVPN Access Server

4.2 out of 5

OpenVPN Access Server

4.2 out of 5

OpenVPN Access Server is valued for its affordability and swift deployment, appealing to budget-conscious users seeking straightforward network management. In comparison, Safe-T Secure Application Access offers advanced features and secure access without network changes, catering to those prioritizing comprehensive security despite higher costs.

Download OpenVPN Access Server vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report

Pricing

OpenVPN Access Server has a straightforward setup cost, while Safe-T Secure Application Access presents a more complex pricing structure.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenVPN Access Server has a straightforward setup cost, while Safe-T Secure Application Access presents a more complex pricing structure.

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Safe-T Secure Application Access offers cost-effective secure access solutions, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides an extensive feature set and robust security capabilities, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing a comprehensive and dynamic security approach.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report

Pricing

Safe-T Secure Application Access offers lower setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, highlighting a cost-effective option for initial deployment, while Check Point Harmony SASE may provide more features justifying its higher setup expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

4.2 out of 5

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

4.2 out of 5

Safe-T Secure Application Access excels in pricing and customer support. In comparison, Cisco Secure Client offers superior features and functionality, making its higher price worthwhile. Safe-T is easier to deploy, while Cisco focuses on performance. Tech buyers may choose based on pricing or advanced features.

Download Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report

Pricing

Safe-T Secure Application Access has lower initial setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Client, which may have higher setup expenses depending on the deployment scale.

View comparison

Pricing

Safe-T Secure Application Access has lower initial setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Client, which may have higher setup expenses depending on the deployment scale.

CyberArk Identity

4.1 out of 5

CyberArk Identity

4.1 out of 5

CyberArk Identity is favored for its competitive pricing and strong ROI, with responsive customer service and comprehensive identity management. In comparison, Safe-T Secure Application Access excels in secure remote access and application isolation features, with users appreciating its overall value despite higher initial costs.

Download CyberArk Identity vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report

Pricing

CyberArk Identity's setup cost is often considered high compared to Safe-T Secure Application Access, which offers a more straightforward and budget-friendly setup process. CyberArk Identity's setup is detailed and complex, requiring more resources than Safe-T Secure Application Access.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Access Management

ZTNA