Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Oracle and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Oracle is ranked #41 with an average rating of 9.0, while Splunk is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in IM, compared to Splunk’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...

Read 1 Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service review

471 Views
471 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 75 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

7,605 Views
2,662 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service compete in infrastructure monitoring. Splunk takes the lead with its detailed analytics and flexibility.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud offers strong analytical tools, real-time alerts, and advanced visualization capabilities. Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service provides seamless integration with other Oracle products, robust data collection, and scalable monitoring solutions. Splunk's strength lies in analytical depth, while Oracle's strength is in integrated ecosystem features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment of Splunk Observability Cloud is generally straightforward with strong customer support. Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service also offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive support and integration within the Oracle ecosystem. The main distinction is Splunk's superior support quality against Oracle’s ecosystem integration benefits.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud is considered cost-effective with a strong ROI due to flexible pricing and lower initial setup costs. Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service requires a more significant investment but offers value through enhanced functionality and integration, leading to excellent long-term ROI. Splunk offers cost-effectiveness, while Oracle demands an initial financial commitment for greater functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

41st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), Network Monitoring Software (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk Observability Cloud	2.0%
Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service	0.4%
Other	97.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Saktid Devi Jeyakaran

Associate Cloud Engineer at Ebizoncloud LLC

Offers real-time alerting and dashboards are great for performance hubs of the database

It's primarily for CPU utilization and resource monitoring. Vulnerability scanning falls under OCI Cloud Guard, so it's related to security concerns. Some people might prefer using a third-party tool for more enhanced features. However, I think Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service could be improved to reduce the need for third-party connectivity. So overall, third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service. OCI needs more research and development to understand why clients choose third-party tools like Splunk or QRadar over internal monitoring solutions. There must be some areas where third-party tools are better. OCI could analyze this and improve its service.

Read full review

Dhananjay Dileep

Senior Software Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Unified monitoring has improved end-to-end visibility and reduced detection time across apps

When we have too many detectors in place for one particular app, such as when I have created 50+ detectors through my account, the entire page becomes a bit loaded when creating the 51st detector, feeling heavy and taking time to load. Additionally, it throws random errors; for example, when we try to save one detector, it might throw some random error which is not even related, with something else being wrong, not that particular error, but the underlying root cause might be different. Sometimes the error is just "some problem occurred," and we are not able to point out what the real cause is. This mainly happens when we have too many detectors or too many alerts in place rather than a standard number. One more thing is in the alert rules; if we have a main general alert, and instead of creating a new detector, we are adding a new rule under one detector, when the number of rules also increases, such as when we have 10 or 15 rules under one generic detector, that again creates the same kind of problem, taking some time to save that particular newly added rule, and it might not save at times, just keeps on spinning. Those are the two drawbacks which I spotted recently; other than that, everything looks perfect.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical VMs, high CPU usage, security concerns."

"Dashboards help the application support teams to have a quick look at how their systems are running. It helps other teams as well."

"The most valuable features include user time tracking and the ability to analyze application load times."

"Splunk Observability Cloud has helped improve our operational performance and company's resilience, which was their initial offering."

"Splunk APM has helped us to standardize logging and monitoring procedures."

"Splunk APM helps us to find errors immediately and resolve them."

"We utilize the APM and auto-detectors, as the core metrics and core alerts are available for us, which are the features of Splunk Observability Cloud that I appreciate the most."

"The tool is efficient in collecting, monitoring and evaluating logs."

"I find the monitoring console very helpful. With one click, I can see how we are performing, and at the same time, I can see what data is flowing."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"Third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service."

"The RUM part of Splunk Observability Cloud can be improved significantly."

"I would rate Splunk technical support at six out of ten. When we have a problem and need to create a case, the response isn't quick."

"There are some predefined metrics.......we may want to create customized metrics."

"The only strain point we've encountered with Splunk Observability Cloud is that the search times can be lengthy for some things."

"It would be beneficial to have more enhanced features with capabilities to adapt more integrated applications. Improvements in dashboard configuration, customization, and artificial intelligence functionalities are desired."

"The dashboards are used mainly to visualize information about the infrastructure, but it isn't easy to construct or use the dashboards. While we tried to resolve the issue by calling support, it would be easier if they had an AI co-pilot to identify the problem and help you solve it."

"We never had any issues when it comes to the type of use cases we are using it for. We did not need more advancement on it, but I know that, in general, everything can be updated. There are tiny little tweaks that can be made regardless of whether it looks better or has a different flow to it than it does right now, but it works pretty well for what we use it for."

"There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available. We sometimes encountered issues in setting up alerts."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For monitoring specifically, it's not that expensive. The licensing is yearly basis."

"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"Splunk offers a 14-day free trial and after that, we have to pay but the cost is reasonable."

"It is expensive."

"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service?

Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service?

For monitoring specifically, it's not that expensive. The licensing is yearly basis. However, there are monthly licensing options available as well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service?

See all answers

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 19% of the time

Datadog vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 18% of the time

Nagios Core vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 16% of the time

Nagios XI vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 14% of the time

OpsRamp vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 12% of the time

More Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service Competitors

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Avantra vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Honeycomb Enterprise vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

December 2025

Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

January 2026

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Overview

Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is a software-as-a-service solution that monitors the status and health of your entire IT infrastructure - on-premises or on the cloud - from a single platform. Proactive monitoring across all your infrastructure tiers enables you to be alerted on issues, troubleshoot and resolve these before they impact end users.

Oracle

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

COMPOSERS AND AUTHORS SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.