Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs PostgreSQL comparison

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 125 PostgreSQL reviews

7,275 Views
6,620 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

PostgreSQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service are key competitors in the database solutions market. PostgreSQL is often seen as having the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and cost-effectiveness derived from its open-source nature.

Features: PostgreSQL is renowned for its support of complex queries, strong SQL standards compliance, and reliability across a range of environments. It offers extensive language support and is fully ACID compliant, making it well-suited for organizations requiring robust transaction handling. Conversely, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is distinguished by its multiple storage engine capabilities, providing flexible data storage, and its architecture allows for rapid query processing ideal for speed-focused applications.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL can be less efficient in handling a high volume of records and may struggle with certain SQL queries MySQL manages well. Additionally, it can be slower with read-only queries. MySQL benefits from enhancements in cloud scalability and would be more versatile with additional out-of-the-box features. Improving support for advanced features could augment MySQL's appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL's deployment is versatile across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, supported by a substantial community. However, its reliance on community support can vary in effectiveness. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers streamlined cloud deployment options and established technical support, appealing to organizations that prioritize dedicated assistance.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL offers significant cost advantages due to its open-source nature, eliminating licensing fees and offering favorable ROI for startups and cost-conscious enterprises. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, while more expensive due to licensing, justifies costs with strong performance and reliability, which can enhance ROI in performance-critical scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: September 2025).

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (11th)

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

125

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 16.6%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
PostgreSQL	16.6%
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service	0.6%
Other	82.8%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

PavithrarajShetty

Software Architect at Tetherfi

Offers simplicity and is cheaply priced

I haven't gone through the scalability aspect since I was using MySQL Server. I haven't worked to a high level in PostgreSQL, but with MySQL Server, I have managed clustering and partitioning. I think I haven't put much focus on PostgreSQL, so I am not sure how it behaves or how it works.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."

"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is the data aggregation function."

"The product is easy to learn."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is flexible and is an open-source product."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"The performance is good."

"The tool is user-friendly."

"It is easy to install and easy to manage. There is no license on it, so it is free. There is high compatibility with Oracle, and there are many tools for the migration of data from Oracle to Postgre."

"PostgreSQL is very powerful, easy to manage, and has many features."

"Initial setup is simple."

"The system can perform faster analysis by providing it with a lot of memory. Speed is crucial for analytics. Currently, the main reason we haven't adopted Elasticsearch is that we lack the necessary expertise to manage it."

"The product is quite flexible."

"I like that you can move any relational database from Oracle to PostgreSQL. I also like that it's pretty stable."

Cons

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"In a production environment, upgrading from a lower to an upper version is a very long process that needs to be improved."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service's scalability is an area of concern that can be better."

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."

"The solution should offer memory management."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"The search option is not very good."

"They need to improve the user experience of the management."

"Integration with other platforms could be improved."

"PostgreSQL could improve by adding data warehousing tools."

"As PostgreSQL is an open-source product, you do have to do a bit more configuration and management yourself."

"PostgreSQL could improve by being more user-friendly. In SQL Server they have a studio where you can easily do management but not in this solution."

"Instead of the installation agent downloading all the packages for the install, it should allow the user to download the packages separately on their own to do the install."

"The interface climate could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The product is expensive."

"It is also open-source so it is free."

"The licensing model is good."

"The community version of Postgre is basically free."

"This solution can offer a cheaper choice for customers since it is open-source."

"It is free. In terms of operating costs, it basically needs the same platform on which Oracle runs."

"The tool is cheaply priced compared to other RDBMS providers in the market."

"It could be much cheaper. If you would like to build an application on Amazon today, PostgreSQL is the standard database with Redshift. If you want other databases, you can add them, but PostgreSQL is the basis of everything. It's a question of money, that's it."

"Affordable solution."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	58
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What do you like most about PostgreSQL?

It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

The tool is free of cost. For now, it's not about making money. But once we perfect it, we can offer it to customers willing to pay for support and other services. Most of my deployments are free.

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparisons

Compared 42% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 31% of the time

Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 27% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 31% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 12% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 6% of the time

Product Reports

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL