Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs PostgreSQL comparison

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 127 PostgreSQL reviews

10,667 Views
8,854 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

PostgreSQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service are key competitors in the database solutions market. PostgreSQL is often seen as having the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and cost-effectiveness derived from its open-source nature.

Features: PostgreSQL is renowned for its support of complex queries, strong SQL standards compliance, and reliability across a range of environments. It offers extensive language support and is fully ACID compliant, making it well-suited for organizations requiring robust transaction handling. Conversely, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is distinguished by its multiple storage engine capabilities, providing flexible data storage, and its architecture allows for rapid query processing ideal for speed-focused applications.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL can be less efficient in handling a high volume of records and may struggle with certain SQL queries MySQL manages well. Additionally, it can be slower with read-only queries. MySQL benefits from enhancements in cloud scalability and would be more versatile with additional out-of-the-box features. Improving support for advanced features could augment MySQL's appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL's deployment is versatile across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, supported by a substantial community. However, its reliance on community support can vary in effectiveness. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers streamlined cloud deployment options and established technical support, appealing to organizations that prioritize dedicated assistance.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL offers significant cost advantages due to its open-source nature, eliminating licensing fees and offering favorable ROI for startups and cost-conscious enterprises. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, while more expensive due to licensing, justifies costs with strong performance and reliability, which can enhance ROI in performance-critical scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: April 2026).

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (12th)

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

127

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 1.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 13.3%, down from 18.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PostgreSQL	13.3%
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service	1.7%
Other	85.0%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

SandroChauca

Infrastructure Coordinator at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Open-source application support enhances development flexibility and maintenance efficiency

Until now, I have not developed an application using Microsoft with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, but I think Microsoft has developed the network framework. The network framework runs successfully in Linux. If we develop a project using the network as a framework for the application, then we can use Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a data repository when we are in the production environment. We can develop the Windows application. I know how to develop some projects related to AI, but I have not developed this application yet. All the features are excellent. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service a nine.

Read full review

Shobhit Goel

Data Science Architect at publicis Sapient

High-volume transactions have reduced failures and improve customer service efficiency

The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL. I have also enabled the PG vector plugin on top of PostgreSQL. I have the opportunity to use two different features and two different flavors in a single product, which is the best thing about PostgreSQL. Initially, we had some hiccups around the performance part, but later we did indexing in PostgreSQL and now it is working very well. Even when we are doing 100,000 transactions in a day, PostgreSQL is working excellently. The interface is another best feature. If I need to do any query, I simply install the plugin on my local, which is pgAdmin. Through pgAdmin, I am able to communicate with PostgreSQL and execute all my SQL queries. I am getting a better UI with PostgreSQL as the backend, which is also one of the best options. PG vector is also very strong from PostgreSQL where I have implemented RAG and on a daily basis, I inject thousands of pages of PDF. More than 100 PDFs are coming into my system and one PDF is around 1,000 pages. We are injecting them into PostgreSQL and converting them into dimensions and inserting them into PG vector. The level of transactions we are doing on a daily basis is substantial, and we are getting very good throughput and low latency from PostgreSQL. When we were doing more than 50,000 transactions in a minute with the previous database, we were getting a lot of latency issues with threads getting blocked and abruptly closed unwantedly. After doing extensive research, we decided to move to PostgreSQL. Now, we are doing around 100,000 transactions in PostgreSQL and we are getting good throughput with no latency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

"The simplicity of the solution is very good; it's a straightforward solution and makes for a very good cloud option."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."

"The product is easy to learn."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is flexible and is an open-source product."

"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"It's very stable."

"What I like is that it's quite powerful in terms of performance."

"It is a good free RDBMS; it's stable, scalable and reliable."

"Initial setup is simple."

"Because we use it in many information systems (Financial, Human Resources, Inventory Management) in several large companies with significant data flow, we have not had problems."

"JSON data support is most valuable to me as it saves design and maintenance time."

"It has a lot of free tools available for data access, and has easy integration with a lot of visualization tools such as QlikView and Tableau."

"PostgreSQL provides the perfect combination of freedom, reliability, stability, security, performance, power, and ease of use."

Cons

"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."

"Relational databases, in general, are not known to be as scalable as NoSQL databases."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"In a production environment, upgrading from a lower to an upper version is a very long process that needs to be improved."

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."

"The technical support is in need of improvement."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"Less advanced programmers may have a bit of a learning curve."

"Slow count. As the number of rows exceed a couple million, the count query and queries which get to the depth of the data (like FTS) start taking too much time even with all the right indexes in place."

"The only thing I would really want/need to improve is pgAdmin3."

"It is missing some key scalability features such as sharding and automatic failover, but the Postgres developers are working on adding these features."

"This solution could be better integrated with other systems."

"The scalability is limited."

"One of the features it needs is a tighter integration with business intelligence software, so that the optimisation of the requests can be handled natively in the database."

"This extension hasn’t been updated in several releases and would benefit from an overhaul."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The product is expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"It is free, but if you need support, you can go for the commercial version called EnterpriseDB. They provide paid support, and they can even do hosting for you if you want standby and support."

"There is an annual license."

"It is open source. There is no licensing."

"This solution can offer a cheaper choice for customers since it is open-source."

"It is also open-source so it is free."

"The licensing model is good."

"The need for our customers to pay for licences is contingent on their projects and budgets."

"PostgreSQL is a free and open-source database."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

What is your primary use case for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I work in finance, financial services, banking, and financial services.

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What do you like most about PostgreSQL?

It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

I purchased from the marketplace, so licensing and pricing cost is acceptable. To be honest, there is a separate team who handles the cost of licensing everything. I have admin access on Azure and ...

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

Faiss vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 7% of the time

Percona Server vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 16% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 6% of the time

LanceDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service boasts autonomous capabilities, scalability, and robust integration ideal for large-scale database management. Users appreciate its open-source flexibility and comprehensive support.

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers a strong platform for managing vast databases, integrating advanced InnoDB features along with support for JSON and geographical queries. It is designed for ease of use with enhanced scalability and no requirement for a dedicated DBA, facilitating straightforward installation and management. Valued for its stable performance, the service supports a wide range of protocols and fast connections, aided by detailed documentation. However, improvements are desired in areas like business intelligence integration, automation, and Windows performance.

What are the key features of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Autonomous Capabilities: Automates database management tasks, enhancing efficiency.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to growing data and user demand.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with platforms such as MariaDB and AWS.
InnoDB Features: Offers advanced table and transaction support for optimized data handling.
JSON & Geographical Queries: Supports modern data processing needs.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Affordability: Cost-effective solutions for database management.
Flexibility: Open-source structure allows customization.
Performance: Provides stable and reliable system behavior.
Connection Speed: Ensures quick access and data processing.
Documentation: Extensive resources aid in user support and troubleshooting.

Users employ Oracle MySQL Cloud Service in sectors like publishing, healthcare, and financial services, leveraging it for data management, analytics, and cloud migrations. It supports a wide range of applications, from student information management to mobile app services, bolstering projects with comprehensive platform integration capabilities.

Oracle

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL