Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs PostgreSQL comparison

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 128 PostgreSQL reviews

13,938 Views
11,011 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

PostgreSQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service compete in the database management system category. PostgreSQL has the upper hand due to its open-source nature, comprehensive feature set, and strong community support.

Features: PostgreSQL offers comprehensive features like spatial support, making it suitable for GIS applications like QGIS and PostGIS. It includes full-text search, easy replication mechanisms, and supports JSON, XML, and arrays. Its extensive extensions like PostGIS enhance its capabilities. In contrast, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, while stable, lacks open-source benefits and is more restrictive in terms of JSONB support and indexing features.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL users seek improved user-friendliness, better input/output tools, and more efficient database upgrades and restoration processes. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service faces criticism for its performance limitations, particularly on Windows, and demands enhancements in scalability and ease of integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL is versatile, supporting hybrid, private, and public cloud environments and on-premises setups. It relies on a strong open-source community for support. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service focuses on public and hybrid cloud deployments and receives praise for its ease of setup but garners criticism for relying on paid support.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL's open-source nature makes it cost-effective with no licensing fees, translating to significant ROI benefits, particularly attractive for startups. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, on the other hand, tends to be expensive and its licensing costs can negatively impact ROI, although it offers features that cater to enterprise needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: September 2026).

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (14th)

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

128

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 2.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 12.0%, down from 16.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PostgreSQL	12.0%
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service	2.0%
Other	86.0%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Roberto Stern

Director at Adamos Tecnologia

Efficiently manages extensive datasets with rapid connections and wide tool support

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install. It does not require a DBA for management. The connections are very fast and it supports several thousand users simultaneously without any issues. New connections do not hang server operations. As soon as new releases are put out, they work as expected. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is supported by every vendor and tool, including architectural, integration, and generation tools, offering wide protocol support. This makes Oracle MySQL Cloud Service a valuable solution.

Read full review

Shobhit Goel

Data Science Architect at publicis Sapient

High-volume transactions have reduced failures and improve customer service efficiency

The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL. I have also enabled the PG vector plugin on top of PostgreSQL. I have the opportunity to use two different features and two different flavors in a single product, which is the best thing about PostgreSQL. Initially, we had some hiccups around the performance part, but later we did indexing in PostgreSQL and now it is working very well. Even when we are doing 100,000 transactions in a day, PostgreSQL is working excellently. The interface is another best feature. If I need to do any query, I simply install the plugin on my local, which is pgAdmin. Through pgAdmin, I am able to communicate with PostgreSQL and execute all my SQL queries. I am getting a better UI with PostgreSQL as the backend, which is also one of the best options. PG vector is also very strong from PostgreSQL where I have implemented RAG and on a daily basis, I inject thousands of pages of PDF. More than 100 PDFs are coming into my system and one PDF is around 1,000 pages. We are injecting them into PostgreSQL and converting them into dimensions and inserting them into PG vector. The level of transactions we are doing on a daily basis is substantial, and we are getting very good throughput and low latency from PostgreSQL. When we were doing more than 50,000 transactions in a minute with the previous database, we were getting a lot of latency issues with threads getting blocked and abruptly closed unwantedly. After doing extensive research, we decided to move to PostgreSQL. Now, we are doing around 100,000 transactions in PostgreSQL and we are getting good throughput with no latency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My advice to anybody who is researching this solution is that it is a better option than other solutions."

"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."

"It’s easy to implement and affordable."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

"It is an established open-source database with a vast array of resources available, ensuring you can learn everything needed."

"The solution's performance is good."

"The most valuable feature is the data aggregation function."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"We don't regret any choosing this solution."

"I like that you can move any relational database from Oracle to PostgreSQL. I also like that it's pretty stable."

"The solution has many valuable features such as it is easy to use and the interface is intuitive."

"PostgreSQL provides the structured persistence layer that makes my AI experimentation and evaluation processes manageable, repeatable, and scalable."

"The product is easy to use and works fast for relational databases."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"We use this solution as part of our backend to store data that is coming from the sensors, and it is needed to save the meter data from the sensors."

"This is a very good product, and I'm very pleased, especially with the latest versions."

Cons

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"The technical support is in need of improvement."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service's scalability is an area of concern that can be better."

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"Relational databases, in general, are not known to be as scalable as NoSQL databases."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"I'd like to see the following improvements: Streaming replication (or similar) disconnected from the version, so we can use it for upgrades (i.e., a 9.3 version master and a 9.5 slave)."

"The only thing for PG vector is if the dimension limit could be increased."

"The solution is not as stable in comparison to Microsoft SQL Server."

"Improved support for parallel query execution Merge Joins Improved Handling of Materialized Views"

"Yes, as the database grows, one has to perform a full vacuum in order to continue to work on the database."

"PostgreSQL could be used for small to medium databases but not for a huge production database."

"They need to have a better graphical interface. There is a tool called pgAdmin 4 that they use, which is free. It is written in Java, and it is slow. They need to have a better product that is similar to Toad for Oracle, but, of course, it is hard to get something that's really great and free. Other than that, it is great."

"Performance and scalability are areas where PostgreSQL can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"It is open source. There is no licensing."

"Our company pays for it. There are free versions available, but for advanced features, you obviously have to pay."

"It is open-source. If you use it on-premise, it is free. It also has enterprise or commercial versions. If you go for the cloud version, there will be a cost, but it is lower than Oracle or Microsoft."

"PostgreSQL is open-source, so if capable admins are available then the setup cost can be $0."

"The need for our customers to pay for licences is contingent on their projects and budgets."

"We are using the free version of PostgreSQL."

"It is free. In terms of operating costs, it basically needs the same platform on which Oracle runs."

"There is an annual license."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	58
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

What is your primary use case for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I work in finance, financial services, banking, and financial services.

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

I am not directly involved in the licensing or procurement decisions, so I cannot comment in detail on the price. From an engineering perspective, PostgreSQL is cost-efficient because it is open so...

What needs improvement with PostgreSQL?

While improving reliability, I have noticed that the limitations in PostgreSQL can be complex. For large-scale deployments, configuration, performance tuning, and related tasks can be complex and i...

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

MariaDB vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 12% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

LanceDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service boasts autonomous capabilities, scalability, and robust integration ideal for large-scale database management. Users appreciate its open-source flexibility and comprehensive support.

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers a strong platform for managing vast databases, integrating advanced InnoDB features along with support for JSON and geographical queries. It is designed for ease of use with enhanced scalability and no requirement for a dedicated DBA, facilitating straightforward installation and management. Valued for its stable performance, the service supports a wide range of protocols and fast connections, aided by detailed documentation. However, improvements are desired in areas like business intelligence integration, automation, and Windows performance.

What are the key features of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Autonomous Capabilities: Automates database management tasks, enhancing efficiency.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to growing data and user demand.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with platforms such as MariaDB and AWS.
InnoDB Features: Offers advanced table and transaction support for optimized data handling.
JSON & Geographical Queries: Supports modern data processing needs.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Affordability: Cost-effective solutions for database management.
Flexibility: Open-source structure allows customization.
Performance: Provides stable and reliable system behavior.
Connection Speed: Ensures quick access and data processing.
Documentation: Extensive resources aid in user support and troubleshooting.

Users employ Oracle MySQL Cloud Service in sectors like publishing, healthcare, and financial services, leveraging it for data management, analytics, and cloud migrations. It supports a wide range of applications, from student information management to mobile app services, bolstering projects with comprehensive platform integration capabilities.

Oracle

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL