Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs PostgreSQL comparison

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 125 PostgreSQL reviews

7,165 Views
6,305 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

PostgreSQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service are key competitors in the database solutions market. PostgreSQL is often seen as having the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and cost-effectiveness derived from its open-source nature.

Features: PostgreSQL is renowned for its support of complex queries, strong SQL standards compliance, and reliability across a range of environments. It offers extensive language support and is fully ACID compliant, making it well-suited for organizations requiring robust transaction handling. Conversely, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is distinguished by its multiple storage engine capabilities, providing flexible data storage, and its architecture allows for rapid query processing ideal for speed-focused applications.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL can be less efficient in handling a high volume of records and may struggle with certain SQL queries MySQL manages well. Additionally, it can be slower with read-only queries. MySQL benefits from enhancements in cloud scalability and would be more versatile with additional out-of-the-box features. Improving support for advanced features could augment MySQL's appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL's deployment is versatile across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, supported by a substantial community. However, its reliance on community support can vary in effectiveness. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers streamlined cloud deployment options and established technical support, appealing to organizations that prioritize dedicated assistance.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL offers significant cost advantages due to its open-source nature, eliminating licensing fees and offering favorable ROI for startups and cost-conscious enterprises. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, while more expensive due to licensing, justifies costs with strong performance and reliability, which can enhance ROI in performance-critical scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: December 2025).

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (15th)

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

125

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 14.7%, down from 18.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
PostgreSQL	14.7%
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service	1.0%
Other	84.3%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Roberto Stern

Director at Adamos Tecnologia

Efficiently manages extensive datasets with rapid connections and wide tool support

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install. It does not require a DBA for management. The connections are very fast and it supports several thousand users simultaneously without any issues. New connections do not hang server operations. As soon as new releases are put out, they work as expected. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is supported by every vendor and tool, including architectural, integration, and generation tools, offering wide protocol support. This makes Oracle MySQL Cloud Service a valuable solution.

Read full review

Akhilesh Chipre

Senior Assosiate Consultant at Applied Materials

Real-time data capture optimizes database performance but Views create problems

One of the most valuable features is real-time data capture; it optimizes database performance. I think using real-time data capture reduces job running time and the amount of data sent at once with batch loads. Replicating the same data daily isn't optimal, so real-time reception improves application performance and reduces latency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability of the database is absolutely guaranteed by the new features."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"The access to a suite of management and administration tools that simplify tasks such as database provisioning, configuration, and monitoring."

"It is very easy to start working with the product."

"The product is good for tuning."

"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."

"It's easy to use."

"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"It has completely met our needs. It works, and it is robust. We haven't had any problems with what PostgreSQL does for us and the way it does it. That's why we've been using it for so long. We understand it, and it does the job."

"We often use PostgreSQL for operations monitoring because we are a manufacturing company."

"The product is easy to use and works fast for relational databases."

"PostgreSQL has complete SQL dialects and is useful for writing sophisticated and complex queries. We have experience with Oracle database. My partner is experienced in DDA and he writes sophisticated SQL queries. The solution helps to get the job done in the best possible way. In today’s age, most developers do not have strong SQL knowledge or language command. They find it difficult to write even a SQL statement. These developers write cool queries which perform badly on the database end. As DBAs, we constantly urge the developers not to write bad queries, help them learn more, and write placebo commands."

"The most valuable features are the price, stability, it is scalable and is used by our clients in small business environments, and it is a simple product to use."

"The PostgreSQL database is similar to the SQL Server but has a slightly different technology that has similar resources as well. If the customer has the confidence using SQL Server, they will be fairly comfortable using this solution."

"The solution is open-source and free to use."

"PostgreSQL is very powerful, easy to manage, and has many features."

Cons

"The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions."

"In a production environment, upgrading from a lower to an upper version is a very long process that needs to be improved."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"The technical support is in need of improvement."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"The user interface is not simple."

"The product has many bugs."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"It needs more integration."

"I have noticed that user and access management should be improved."

"There are some products out there that have a slightly different method of implementation for the SQL language. Some of those are slightly better in some areas, and PostgreSQL is slightly better in some areas. I would probably like to match all of those products together. It is just down to the functionality. For example, Oracle has a number of options within SQL that are outside of what you would class as the SQL standard. PostgreSQL misses some of those, but PostgreSQL does other things that are better than what Oracle does. I would like to merge those two products so that there is a certain amount of functionality in a single product."

"The scalability is limited."

"PostgreSQL uses high memory compared to its counterparts when a highly demanding load is involved, especially one that makes many concurrent connections to the database."

"It still needs to be more mature and have some backup feature. We are normally dealing with Oracle's data, and we have very strong online tools to back up the data and do other things. PostgreSQL still needs to do more in this area as well as in the high availability area. There are many external tools that you can use for PostgreSQL's high availability, but there is no embedded tool within PostgreSQL for high availability. It could have a feature similar to Oracle for working on a distributed system. It can have some scripts to improve the monitoring and some tools to do performance analysis. We have a workaround for most of such requirements except for the support for a distributed system, which is very difficult to have. This area should be included in the core of the database itself."

"They need to have a better graphical interface. There is a tool called pgAdmin 4 that they use, which is free. It is written in Java, and it is slow. They need to have a better product that is similar to Toad for Oracle, but, of course, it is hard to get something that's really great and free. Other than that, it is great."

"PostgreSQL could improve by being more user-friendly. In SQL Server they have a studio where you can easily do management but not in this solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"It is an open-source product."

"The license is expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"It is also open-source so it is free."

"It is free. In terms of operating costs, it basically needs the same platform on which Oracle runs."

"There is an annual license."

"Our company pays for it. There are free versions available, but for advanced features, you obviously have to pay."

"It is open-source. If you use it on-premise, it is free. It also has enterprise or commercial versions. If you go for the cloud version, there will be a cost, but it is lower than Oracle or Microsoft."

"It is free, but if you need support, you can go for the commercial version called EnterpriseDB. They provide paid support, and they can even do hosting for you if you want standby and support."

"We do not pay for licensing."

"It is an open-source platform."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What do you like most about PostgreSQL?

It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

The tool is free of cost. For now, it's not about making money. But once we perfect it, we can offer it to customers willing to pay for support and other services. Most of my deployments are free.

Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 14% of the time

MariaDB vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 12% of the time

Percona Server vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 12% of the time

Faiss vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 12% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 25% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 10% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

LanceDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

January 2026

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

January 2026

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg