


OutSystems and Studio Creatio compete in the low-code platform market, each offering scalable solutions. Studio Creatio seems to have an upper hand in cost-effectiveness, but OutSystems is often considered worth its price due to its features and flexibility.
Features: OutSystems provides a comprehensive development environment with easy drag-and-drop features, versatile application support across multiple platforms, and solid integration capabilities with external services. Studio Creatio excels with its no-code business process management, allowing process customization and lead tracking, which suits organizations focused on CRM.
Room for Improvement: OutSystems could enhance its architecture and adjust its pricing. Adding more AI functionalities would be beneficial. Studio Creatio would benefit from improved integration capabilities with APIs and greater customization flexibility in its UI.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OutSystems supports varied deployment options across public and private clouds, but its technical support needs improvement. Studio Creatio provides similar deployment flexibility and has a slightly better reputation in customer service, although responsiveness remains a common issue.
Pricing and ROI: OutSystems is perceived as costly, which is a concern for smaller companies. However, it delivers strong ROI due to its rapid development capabilities. Studio Creatio is seen as more budget-friendly, offering competitive pricing compared to other low-code solutions, making it attractive for larger enterprises.
In terms of cost, we participated in projects achieving two to three million dollars in annual savings.
As a return on investment, we have achieved a 250% ROI in six to nine months, and sometimes it increases up to 380% percent.
Automation Anywhere has helped us save money.
Developing that same project in OutSystems can be completed in around 40 to 50% less time, requiring only six resources.
Time efficiency. Your team can be deployed to work on different modules parallelly and you can really save time up to an enormous level.
In the first year alone, they saved 50,000 dollars, and moving forward, their platform expense was 210,000 dollars versus 500,000 dollars, along with other support and costs that were significant, resulting in a substantial difference.
Whenever we need help, we can reach out to them, and they help us out.
We also have dedicated account managers and technical experts to solve our problems related to Automation Anywhere.
We just have to raise a ticket, after which we receive a call, email, or ping from the Automation Anywhere team.
Many helpful videos and documentation are available on the OutSystems site, making it relatively easy to learn the platform.
They do have the customer support ticketing system where you can raise the ticket, decide the priority, and depending upon your priority and urgency, they are going to resolve your problem.
There have been no issues with support,
We have a manager, and we can ask anything we need, and they are involved in our questions.
The customer support is quite helpful and the turnaround time is within 24 hours to 48 hours based on the priority of the request.
As we are using Microsoft Copilot for our AI agents, I look forward to integrating it with Automation Anywhere and its solutions, seeing it as a beneficial partnership as Automation progresses toward AI as the main solution.
The centralized control room allows us to orchestrate and manage bots seamlessly.
I can scale it in terms of hundreds of bots and configure hundreds of parallel robots easily.
They can be deployed vertically and horizontally, supporting as many deployments as needed.
Studio Creatio has very good scalability with no problems.
I have seen many organizations depend on Studio Creatio and work with it for almost two to three years while continuously improving their system.
With the latest applications, there are no significant issues like freezing or crashing.
From a stability and reliability perspective, we can remain confident that the product performs as an enterprise solution and meets expected standards.
If you have good best practices, reusable code, an effective framework, and a solid development methodology, bots can be very stable.
It is quite stable, clean, and a steady platform.
Studio Creatio is very stable in my experience.
It is better to write a Python script instead of using Automation Anywhere's package when dealing with Excel because it is buggy and tends to break.
Making the product more lightweight by reducing its dependency on infrastructure could greatly help in the long run.
It would be beneficial if the platform provided options for power developers to integrate seamlessly with languages like Java or C#, allowing them to write their own scripts and code.
It is crucial to be aware of which module corresponds to which application in real-time projects, as there are multiple applications.
You have to design your architecture in a very magnificent and decent way so that how you process your data so that load can be easily balanced.
I would like to see more integration between the use of artificial intelligence to speed up the process delivery time.
It is a workflow automation process and enterprise-grade application where an understanding of the platform is essential to use Studio Creatio.
More comprehensive use cases and in-depth scenarios covering real business situations and solutions are definitely needed.
I would prefer to improve some integrations in Studio Creatio, specifically by adding a few more blocks in business process to improve functionality with integrations with native API without any coding.
It is more cost-efficient compared to all other RPA platforms.
Automation Anywhere costs are aligned with UiPath and Blue Prism, which are also expensive.
It is not cheap, with costs ranging between 700 to 800 dollars per month.
Subsequent users can be added at an additional cost per user; exact pricing details can be found on the OutSystems site.
Compared to the competition, Studio Creatio is still in the average line because the pricing that others offer is quite high, but Studio Creatio is average.
Based on my experience, the company's pricing, setup cost, and licensing are somewhat high.
I can set it up to provide users with a form to fill in all required information, and then the bot operates based on those specifications.
For example, the email module has been enhanced over the years to support all the latest authentication technologies. That is very important as we move away from username and password and embrace multi-factor authentication.
Automation Anywhere has undergone drastic changes over the past five years, transitioning from version 10 to A360, including desktop-based and cloud-based options.
OutSystems offers a lot of reusable components and solutions that I can simply drag and drop and use, which has a significant impact on project delivery time.
We use integration extensively in OutSystems, which allows us to connect our own internal systems to our newly created system applications.
OutSystems has a very good learning curve for developers.
It supports all the horizontal and vertical scaling needs, with the ability to support from a minimum of 10 users to thousands of users without any lag in response.
The Process Designer is fundamental to nearly all my work.
The best feature Studio Creatio offers is its no-code functionality.


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 154 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 82 |
| Large Enterprise | 536 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.
Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.
What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?
What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?
In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.
OutSystems is a low-code platform designed for accelerated application development, offering customizable UI with drag-and-drop features and integration options for efficient workflow management.
OutSystems supports rapid project delivery through visual modeling and reusable components, facilitating Agile development across platforms. It integrates seamlessly with databases and external services, offering native mobile capabilities and enterprise scalability. While known for handling complex demands with ease, users suggest enhancements in AI integration, support services, pricing, and documentation. Automation, version control, and learning resources are other areas highlighted for potential improvement. OutSystems is widely used for streamlining processes in banking, healthcare, and insurance industries, with integrations into SAP and ServiceNow, leveraging cloud capabilities on AWS and Azure.
What are the key features of OutSystems?In industries such as banking, healthcare, and insurance, OutSystems is employed to develop both web and mobile applications for streamlined processes and task automation. Companies use this platform for rapid application development, integrating with systems like SAP and ServiceNow, and employing cloud services from AWS and Azure for optimized deployment.
Studio Creatio offers a customizable low-code/no-code platform for process management, CRM, and case management. With scalability and intuitive usability, it supports complex workflows and omnichannel communication, enhancing business efficiency.
Studio Creatio focuses on enhancing business process management with its adaptable platform. It provides CRM functionality and dynamic case management suitable for diverse business applications. The platform is praised for scalability, ease of change implementation, and advanced AI tools. Users benefit from excellent dashboards, an offline mobile app, and robust support. While its strengths are notable, there is potential for improved UI customization, translation accuracy, and seamless integration. Users seek enriched process design tools, flexible data handling, on-premise versions, and optimized mobile and cloud performance.
What are the key features of Studio Creatio?Studio Creatio empowers industries like insurance, banking, and education with solutions for process automation, CRM, and third-party tool integration. It optimizes sales, marketing, and services, streamlines tasks, and supports recruitment and workflow dematerialization. Organizations benefit from enhanced decision-making through data collection and analysis, leading to improved customer-centric platforms.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.