


Sumo Logic Security and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR compete in the security management category. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR seems to have an edge due to its advanced automation and integration capabilities.
Features: Sumo Logic Security offers threat intelligence integration, custom alerts, and log aggregation for real-time monitoring. Users value its user-friendly interface and stability. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has extensive playbooks and performs seamless integration, providing advanced automation, incident management, and orchestration.
Room for Improvement: Sumo Logic Security needs improvement in dashboard creation, API integration, and simplifying log ingestion. Users face a steep learning curve and desire more competitive pricing. Its scalability and stability need enhancements. Cortex XSOAR could benefit from reduced data processing time, more integrations, and a versatile user interface. Users have requested a more competitive pricing model and better support for smaller organizations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sumo Logic Security is cloud-based with quick deployment and user-friendly interfaces, appealing to public cloud users. Users report excellent and responsive customer service. Cortex XSOAR supports multiple deployment options, including hybrid and on-premises, offering greater flexibility. Despite a potentially more complex setup, it provides strong technical support. Sumo Logic sets itself apart with rapid and attentive customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Sumo Logic Security's AWS Marketplace pricing is seen as reasonable but slightly high for smaller organizations, offering a good balance of price and functionality with noticeable ROI in operational improvements. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is considered expensive, especially post-acquisition, though its functionality justifies the cost for larger enterprises. Both offer annual licensing, but Cortex XSOAR's flexible automation capabilities can help mitigate license costs over time.
Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts. It is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert.
By the time we officially bought Torq, we already had two workflows that were very helpful to us.
It pretty much took until we got to our first renewal where we said that this is the value we see, this is the things we want more, but that is the first place where we said we are happy enough that we want to renew.
We are positioning Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which can be used in the SOC and do a lot of automation for the customer.
We have saved 64 hours of our time overall.
The return on investment I have seen with Sumo Logic Security in the past year and a half is tough to quantify, but I would estimate it has hit the milestones we set internally for return on investment.
The speed and quality of their answers have been pretty good, as I usually get a response within 24 hours, and they follow up well.
We can always get an answer, and the support team are experts in their own system.
Nine out of ten times, they give me a solution even if it is not the solution I wanted, and I still can get to the result.
Eight out of ten times, they provide valuable help.
Their support has been better than Anomali's and they are more responsive.
The technical support provided by Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is good.
They have a response time of forty-eight hours, which is not instant support.
In general, they usually provide continuous support post-implementation, being in touch and trying to help, which makes their after-sale process better than Splunk.
Sumo Logic Security has really good customer support.
Our case management is super scalable.
In terms of scalability, you can do as long as you can build it, and they can support it.
Regarding the ability of the solution to grow in your work environment, if it is scalable, if it fits your business requirements, and if there is room to scale up, the answer is yes, for sure.
The scalability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR supports our growth and security needs because we can integrate various tools and continuously add more capability.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has very good application capabilities and is highly scalable.
The issues with scalability arise from the speed of some integrations, as not all are perfectly tuned by Palo.
Sumo Logic Security scales up automatically because it is a cloud-native SIEM, and I do not need to worry about hardware clusters or capacity planning.
The tool has high scalability because everything is based in the cloud.
I did not face any significant issues with Sumo Logic Security, but the pricing may be a concern as they try to upsell and raise the prices very quickly.
Most of the time, the system is stable as long as the components that they integrate with are stable.
I have never faced any downtime or issues.
Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes.
The system works smoothly even when I navigate deep into the playbook section.
I would rate the stability and reliability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR as a nine.
If there are many records, the system may stop or the UI may become unresponsive.
The query language is pretty straightforward and easy, and it is very powerful for building different searches and dashboards that will serve for later exploration of the same interests I have.
It operates very well as a cloud-native SaaS platform with high availability, and there is no downtime that I have experienced.
Torq should offer default templates that can directly scan firewall data and automate actions.
It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet.
From an engineering perspective, I think more error messages and error handling information for our engineering team would be very helpful.
The deployment requires integration and the development of integration modules.
One of the significant issues we encounter is system slowdown when we receive an influx of alerts, which inhibits how quickly we can access the information needed for investigation.
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play.
This can lead to alerts that are collections of disjointed signals that sometimes make no sense and lack real context; this simplistic approach makes it hard to find coherent stories during investigations.
I would also appreciate the AWS automation integrations to be more secure because currently, they are using access keys, which involves a user rather than roles, which is the security best practice recommended by AWS.
The correlation rules and log mapping are not as mature compared to other SIM tools like Splunk.
When they bring more and more value into the platform, it makes more sense to pay that price, but still, it is expensive.
Before deciding to implement Torq, I considered that compared to our old case management platform, Torq was a much better price and had a lot better value for what you get out of the platform, which was a key consideration for the company.
It is an expensive solution, not an inexpensive solution, but we get through the flexibility.
For customers, it is zero versus $20 million, which is why they have to make a decision.
This makes it more cost-effective because other solutions often include a third element in their pricing.
From one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I would put Sumo Logic Security at a seven.
If you go to the well-known vendors such as Azure Sentinel or other tools like Splunk, you are going to find them costly since they are well-known and they have much more integration compared to Sumo Logic Security.
Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management has significantly benefited us by integrating the case management platform with the automation, which saves time compared to managing multiple point solutions across our security stack.
The fact that I can build whatever I want within my own imagination and skills without relying on code is the best thing about Torq.
You can copy and paste a cURL command. If you have documentation or APIs, you usually have an example on the side. You basically have all the information on how the API call should be. You can just copy that and paste it into a step, and it will just build the step for you.
Execution of automatic tasks for collecting, enriching, and correlating security events from hundreds of different technologies.
If I already have an established process, I do not have to change my process to fit into the tool. I can modify the tool to fit into my process, which makes things considerably easier.
We have implemented automation features, such as automated responses to email threats and automatic configuration of target devices for blocking specific IPs.
The features I find most useful in Sumo Logic Security are the ease of implementation and connectors; they have a very easy connection and many connectors to important systems, making it very easy to implement and fast to start running in production.
They are able to save time on fewer alerts because we are able to perform tuning on the logs to be able to only get relevant or security relevant incidents.
My SOC analysts were crushed under Splunk, but Sumo has actually eased the workload and made it tolerable for three people.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR | 8.8% |
| Torq | 3.7% |
| Sumo Logic Security | 2.5% |
| Other | 85.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 26 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.
Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.
What are the key features of Torq?In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR enhances security operations automation and integration. Users rely on its incident management capabilities and machine learning to improve response times and efficiency.
Cortex XSOAR stands out for its capability to automate and orchestrate security tasks through customizable playbooks and robust third-party integrations. Its analytics offer insights into incidents, while machine learning prioritizes alerts and reduces false positives. Despite its powerful features, users note room for improvement in documentation, interface design, and integration capabilities. Cost and complexity in setup and deployment are also concerns. Users in security operations centers benefit significantly from automated data enrichment, streamlined incident response, and efficient handling of threats like phishing and endpoint management.
What are the key features of Cortex XSOAR?Cortex XSOAR is implemented across industries for automating and streamlining security operations. Organizations use it to create playbooks, integrate with security tools, and automate repetitive tasks, thereby improving the efficiency of their security operations centers and incident management processes.
Sumo Logic Security offers efficient event monitoring with customizable alerts, centralized log search, and real-time threat detection. It supports multi-cloud environments and integrates with threat intelligence, reducing workload with AI-driven analytics.
Sumo Logic Security empowers organizations with advanced logging and monitoring solutions, facilitating comprehensive security event management. Its robust log search and comparison features, combined with user-friendly dashboards, enable quick event analysis. The platform's multi-cloud support and real-time threat detection are notable features, seamlessly integrating automated log correlation and AI analytics to optimize user experience. Despite needing enhancements in querying and dashboard functionalities, Sumo Logic Security remains a reliable choice for application log management, IT asset visibility, and incident alerting. Organizations utilize it for threat detection, posture monitoring, and compliance audits, in platforms like AWS, focusing on security insights and performance monitoring.
What are the key features of Sumo Logic Security?Organizations in industries like finance and technology implement Sumo Logic Security to maintain security and compliance, leveraging its advanced monitoring and alerting capabilities. Teams focus on application troubleshooting and forensic analysis, ensuring robust security posture and effective incident response across cloud-based environments.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.