Parasoft SOAtest vs Perfecto comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Parasoft and Perforce are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7, while Perforce is ranked #20. Parasoft holds a 2.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Perforce’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

6,729 Views
3,163 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

5,605 Views
3,363 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Perfecto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Perfecto compete in software testing, with SOAtest focusing on API and web services, while Perfecto specializes in mobile and cross-platform testing. Perfecto holds an advantage in mobile testing due to its comprehensive cloud-based capabilities and analytics.

Features:Parasoft SOAtest offers strong support for API and web service testing with features like event monitoring, XML assertions, and scripting options, making it suitable for complex scenario tests and continuous integration. Perfecto excels in mobile and cross-platform testing, providing cloud-based testing labs, detailed analytics, and compatibility with a wide range of devices and browsers.

Room for Improvement:Parasoft SOAtest needs better reporting, smoother integration with test management tools, improved performance, and a user-friendly interface. Perfecto should enhance its web testing capabilities and analytics dashboard while addressing high pricing and reducing cloud-based response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Parasoft SOAtest supports on-premises and hybrid cloud setups, offering consistent but sometimes delayed technical support with a varied customer service experience. Perfecto uses public and private cloud configurations with responsive customer service and efficient technical support.

Pricing and ROI:Parasoft SOAtest is considered expensive but offers good ROI through automation efficiency, though its complex licensing is a concern. Perfecto, while also high-cost, is competitively priced and offers enhanced ROI with seamless mobile testing and cloud benefits, yet users seek more cost-effective options.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Perfecto Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Perfecto

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

12th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (23rd), API Testing Tools (8th)

Perfecto

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (13th), Mobile App Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 2.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perfecto is 2.4%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	2.7%
Perfecto	2.4%
Other	94.9%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Rodrigo Candido Costa

Software Quality and Automation Specialist at PRIME CONTROL

The solution saves us money because the cost of each license is 10 times lower than what we would spend to maintain infrastructure here

Sometimes, when the automated tests sync up or we have to debug remotely, we cannot interact directly with the device. We can interact with the code in the debugging tool, but we cannot directly click on the element on the screen or send other kinds of inputs to the device. This is possible with other tools. Also, it would be nice if there were some kind of API to get a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature was automated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool."

"We don’t have to manually create .EDN and .XML messages, because we can do this with just one click now, which drastically decreases the time that is required to create these messages."

"It enabled an easy integration of our adjacent platform that was for full automation, and we did reach over 97% automation with the use of this tool."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

"SOATest provided a platform for automated testing and creating an enriched automated regression suite."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"Perfecto's device lab has helped us to scale our testing and it has made testing easier for us."

"The automated test reporting functionality is the most valuable feature. We use the CI Dashboard. It's very important as it is the main reporting tool for our automated tests."

"It has saved hours of manual testing time, costs and efforts."

"The most valuable feature is automated testing."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment."

"Perfecto is part of our testing life; when we test, we do it in Perfecto, and without it, our team would not be able to perform testing on mobile devices."

"The quality of our software has improved since we implemented this solution."

"Perfecto facilitates delivering the product on time, through the cloud devices, so that there is no impact to our end-users."

More Perfecto pros

Cons

"The user-interface is not very lightweight or friendly, sometimes buggy and cumbersome."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes."

"Sadly, almost everything needs improving."

"The features of SOAtest used for testing (web) applications on user interface level suffice for very basic web applications, but there are better tools on the market."

"Performance issues if there are too many sessions open on your system."

"Work file [tst] gradually increases in size due to saving or updates of workspace. I can see a major improvement in that."

"In general, its user-friendliness needs a little improvement since there are a few bugs that still remain."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"We feel that Perfecto is a little slow. If they could improve on that slowness in accessing the app, when we want to click a button, that would be great because we feel the difference. An improvement in the connectivity speed is required."

"The flakiness, or the accuracy, of the test execution can be improved. Also, the responsiveness of their cloud lab could be improved as well."

"It is slow compared to physical device testing. The interactive speed could be improved."

"The monitoring features, in particular network traffic monitoring, could be improved."

"It would be nice if there were some kind of AI to compile a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature were automated."

"We don't use Perforce's BlazeMeter with Perfecto. From my perspective, it's not really relevant."

"When using devices on the cloud, it lags quite a bit at times. I know that these are real devices that are being projected on our laptop screens and monitors, but if the speed could be improved, that would be good."

"There could be some improvements done on the interface. At times, there has been a bit of a struggle when finding things on the interface. A UI revamp would be a better option in future. That UI hasn't changed much in a long time, so I think they could just make it a bit better so that people could find stuff easily and intuitively."

More Perfecto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"Perfecto's price is excellent compared to other products with similar features. It was the lowest of the three we evaluated. We also established a partnership with Perfecto, so they provide discounts when we sell Perfecto projects and licenses to our customers."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

September 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

September 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.

What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?

Rapid functional test setup: Streamlines the creation of test scenarios efficiently.
Data-driven testing: Enables easy configuration with different datasets.
Extensive automation: Facilitates comprehensive testing for APIs and UIs.
Protocol support: Integrates SOAP, REST, JSON, SAP RFC functionalities.
Service virtualization: Enhances testing across complex system architectures.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved testing efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts significantly.
Enhanced quality assurance: Elevates application reliability and performance.
Integration capabilities: Coordinates well with Jenkins and GitHub for streamlined processes.
Comprehensive testing: Provides thorough coverage for APIs and web services.

Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.

Parasoft

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Perfecto

September 2026

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. Perfecto

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Perfecto and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Perfecto report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.