Perfecto vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Perforce and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Perforce is ranked #21, while UiPath is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Perforce holds a 2.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

5,605 Views
2,578 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

5,156 Views
3,919 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Perfecto

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Perfecto and UiPath Test Cloud compete in the comprehensive testing solutions category, with Perfecto having a slight edge due to its robust cloud-based testing features across multiple OS versions and devices.

Features: Perfecto offers cloud-based testing on multiple OS versions and devices, enhanced reporting with video recording, and integration with Appium and Selenium. UiPath Test Cloud integrates seamlessly with other UiPath products, provides simplified workflow management, and leverages strong RPA capabilities for extensive automation.

Room for Improvement: Perfecto could further enhance its web testing capabilities, improve iOS performance, and speed up access to new Appium releases. UiPath Test Cloud could strengthen its Jira integration, enhance test manager functionalities, and simplify the manual testing process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Perfecto is primarily deployed on public and private clouds, whereas UiPath Test Cloud offers deployment across on-premises, public, hybrid, and private clouds. Both are known for excellent customer service and technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Perfecto is seen as cost-effective with competitive pricing and partnerships offering discounts, providing significant ROI in reduced infrastructure costs and increased testing speed. UiPath Test Cloud, while more expensive, offers features justifying the cost but may be restrictive for smaller companies despite various licensing options.

To learn more, read our detailed Perfecto vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. UiPath Test Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Perfecto

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (13th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

6th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

4th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th), API Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Perfecto is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.0%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	3.0%
Perfecto	2.3%
Other	94.7%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Rodrigo Candido Costa

Software Quality and Automation Specialist at PRIME CONTROL

The solution saves us money because the cost of each license is 10 times lower than what we would spend to maintain infrastructure here

Sometimes, when the automated tests sync up or we have to debug remotely, we cannot interact directly with the device. We can interact with the code in the debugging tool, but we cannot directly click on the element on the screen or send other kinds of inputs to the device. This is possible with other tools. Also, it would be nice if there were some kind of API to get a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature was automated.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the good things about Perfecto is the scalability that it provides."

"Customer Service: It's been 100%. Technical Support: It's been 100%."

"The quality of our software has improved since we implemented this solution."

"The number one feature, which if we didn't have out-of-the-box would be missed, is the fact that we have video execution. That gives us the ability to view errors or defects in the progression, from beginning to the end of the video."

"Overall, it has definitely translated to cost savings and the reason is multifold."

"It creates a faster production cycle and is quick to market. Things get deployed earlier because the testing happens on time. We can do a lot of panelization, so a lot of test phases can happen in a panel. People don't have to wait for a device to come to them. They can access multiple devices at the same time and do testing at the same time."

"Overall, it has helped massively to speed up our testing efforts and not just from a device point of view."

"The Perfecto device lab has allowed us to run tests on multiple devices at the same time and across multiple platforms as well, increasing the efficiency of our testing and saving money, time, and effort while enabling comprehensive testing and high app quality that we otherwise wouldn't be able to achieve."

More Perfecto pros

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."

"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"In iOS, it needs improvements with some limitations."

"Going by the dashboard or analytics capabilities that Perfecto or Perforce is looking to offer in its roadmap, it will certainly help if they also cater to executing and enabling decision-making, rather than just focusing on standard testing metrics such as execution, efficiency, and defect rate. These are good metrics, but they don't necessarily enable decision-making for SLTs. Any improvements in the dashboards and reporting tools should focus on metrics or SLAs that can help with decision-making."

"On the analytics side, Perfecto is in need of improvement."

"It does well for mobile testing, but when it comes to the web aspect, it is lagging a little bit in terms of execution."

"We don't use Perforce's BlazeMeter with Perfecto. From my perspective, it's not really relevant."

"One improvement would be speed of execution. If it is an iOS native app, we have noticed that the speed is a bit slower. Perfecto might need to make some improvements in this area."

"Previously, we used the cradle. Every time the mobile was blocking it, we would have to ask Perfecto to provide another one. That took a lot of time away from us."

"I would like to see the inclusion of machine learning features. If we can have that, it will be a better tool."

More Perfecto cons

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Perfecto's price is excellent compared to other products with similar features. It was the lowest of the three we evaluated. We also established a partnership with Perfecto, so they provide discounts when we sell Perfecto projects and licenses to our customers."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"Its price is a bit high."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?

My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

QA Wolf vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

LEAPWORK vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

September 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

August 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

Test Suite

Overview

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. UiPath Test Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: Perfecto vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Perfecto vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Perfecto vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.