Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Trellix Collaboration Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.3
Proofpoint Email Protection effectively reduces spam and phishing with superior threat detection, saving time despite some usability issues.
Sentiment score
7.5
Trellix Collaboration Security improved efficiency and reduced staffing needs, despite costly training impacting ROI for some businesses.
The ideal situation would be to have all these portals combined into one unified dashboard.
Information Security Architect at Loews Hotels
The time required for email investigations and responses has changed with Proofpoint Email Protection's visibility and automation.
Sr Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
If you implement these kinds of solutions in your security stack, the first beneficial thing will be that you will not suffer any malware, and you will not face attacks, which ultimately leads to financial benefit.
Senior Security Engineer at DCIPHERS IT SOLUTIONS (P) LTD
With Trellix Collaboration Security's endpoint telemetry, policy automation, and faster threat correlation, our team spent around 25 to 35% less time on routine investigations.
Cybersecurity Engineer Lead at Johnson & Johnson
I have seen a return on investment with Trellix Collaboration Security; specifically, money was saved and fewer employees were needed because I do not need employees on different sites.
Network & Security Lead at a computer software company with 1-10 employees
I observe that the return on investment is hindered by the lack of adequate training opportunities, with Trellix's own training being quite costly, ranging from 2,000 to 4,000 dollars, which many small or medium-sized businesses cannot afford.
Endpoint Security Analyst at BNP Paribas
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Proofpoint Email Protection's customer service is generally praised for promptness and expertise, with some noting room for personalized improvements.
Sentiment score
6.4
Trellix Collaboration Security's support receives mixed reviews, with premium options praised; concerns exist about global support efficiency.
I am familiar with the granular policy control feature of Proofpoint Email Protection, and I find their support excellent for modifying those policies.
Senior Cybersecurity Specialist at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
I rate customer support a three out of ten mainly because of the phishing attacks that are getting through.
Information Security Architect at Loews Hotels
Sometimes I get some really great responses and analysts, but sometimes when their cloud services have a failure, they are slow to respond and tell me about it, though they have been improving.
Consultant at Exelixis Inc
My contract of support at Santander and BNP was a platinum support level, and with that, we really had a good experience.
Cybersecurity Engineer Lead at Johnson & Johnson
My experience with the Indian support team was not as satisfactory since they did not provide adequate support to rectify issues.
Network & Security Lead at a computer software company with 1-10 employees
The support isn't bad, but there is room for improvement in response time.
Cyber Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Proofpoint Email Protection is praised for scalable, adaptable solutions for diverse enterprises, despite some pricing concerns.
Sentiment score
7.9
Trellix Collaboration Security is scalable and integrates well, though licensing can be challenging for growing organizations.
Proofpoint is scalable for multi-site organizations with thousands of users.
Products and solutions director at ITVikings
Proofpoint Email Protection is a scalable solution that very much fits our capacity requirements.
Consultant at Exelixis Inc
Proofpoint Email Protection is quite scalable.
Threat Hunter at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Scalability benefits me by allowing for growth.
Cyber Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The console is strong and can be used for a large quantity of machines without slowing down.
Cybersecurity Engineer Lead at Johnson & Johnson
Trellix Collaboration Security scalability allows me to use sensors on-cloud, on-premises, inside premises, and in a hybrid environment.
Network & Security Lead at a computer software company with 1-10 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Proofpoint Email Protection is highly stable and reliable, with minimal disruptions and rare downtime, despite some interface complaints.
Sentiment score
8.1
Trellix Collaboration Security is generally stable and reliable, though some face integration challenges affecting performance.
It was very rock solid.
Sr Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Sometimes, when creating connectors for implementing with Google Workspace, we encounter challenges because both Google Workspace and Proofpoint Email Protection do not have very good documentation on how to do this.
Senior Security Engineer at DCIPHERS IT SOLUTIONS (P) LTD
When evaluating the stability of Proofpoint Email Protection in regards to downtime, bugs, and glitches, it comes and goes in waves.
Consultant at Exelixis Inc
Sometimes, integration can be challenging, impacting its stability.
Cyber Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Proofpoint Email Protection requires improved integration, AI enhancements, better support, and user-friendly features to enhance user experience and satisfaction.
Trellix Collaboration Security needs improved reporting, spam detection, integration, customization, and virus/spam features, addressing performance and language support issues.
The older legacy user interface just took a little to work with, and the new unified interface, as it was able to do more and more of the functionality of the old one, the product just got easier and easier to use.
Sr Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Proofpoint could expand its phishing detection capabilities to improve its efficiency.
Products and solutions director at ITVikings
More security could be implemented.
Logistics Manager at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
I would like to see the addition of email digital protection features, such as anti-spam and antivirus, not just sandboxing, in the on-premises solution.
Senior Team Leader at BMB
To improve vulnerabilities, Trellix can use an automation process to check if the system is vulnerable.
Network & Security Lead at a computer software company with 1-10 employees
Trellix Collaboration Security can be improved by making the reporting and analysis tools more detailed.
Sr Network & System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Proofpoint Email Protection is expensive but valued for strong threat protection, favored by large organizations despite higher costs.
Trellix Collaboration Security is costly yet valued for multi-year licensing, challenging smaller businesses despite reasonable setup costs.
Customers pay around $90,000 yearly for a 1,000-user organization, with the subscription license being the main expense, apart from implementation fees.
Products and solutions director at ITVikings
Given my other experience with other vendors, I think they are a bit on the high end and a bit on the pricey end for the email security functionality that we were using.
Sr Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Additional costs do come in, but it enhances security.
Logistics Manager at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
It is quite expensive and should be reconsidered.
Cyber Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The setup cost was very cheap.
Network & Security Lead at a computer software company with 1-10 employees
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Collaboration Security is that pricing and setup were reasonable and licensing was straightforward.
Sr Network & System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

Proofpoint Email Protection offers advanced spam and threat blocking, user-friendly interface, real-time screening, and strong Office 365 integration.
Trellix Collaboration Security offers easy integration, advanced threat detection, auto-remediation, and customizable dashboards, enhancing overall security and collaboration.
The main feature I find most effective is that Proofpoint Email Protection scans emails and quarantines the doubtful ones.
Logistics Manager at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
The most beneficial feature of Proofpoint Email Protection is mostly spam filtering; it was very efficient, and we were very happy with the functionality as only relevant emails were allowed for mailboxes.
Manager, IT Director at Cakmak Avukatlik Ortakligi
I appreciate that it's the industry leader, and its firewalling is very easy to manage and implement.
Senior Cybersecurity Specialist at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Another feature I believe is very important is the real-time response capability. It is possible to collect artifacts, run scripts, kill processes, and isolate machines all without leaving the interface.
Cybersecurity Engineer Lead at Johnson & Johnson
One of the most valuable features is the protection against vulnerabilities, particularly through virtual patching.
Cyber Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The entire system is stable and delivers what the customer needs.
Senior Team Leader at BMB
 

Categories and Ranking

Proofpoint Email Protection
Ranking in Email Security
2nd
Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (4th), Digital Risk Protection (3rd), Office 365 Protection (1st)
Trellix Collaboration Security
Ranking in Email Security
13th
Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Instant Communications Security and Compliance (2nd), AI Security (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Proofpoint Email Protection is 8.1%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Collaboration Security is 2.1%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Email Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Proofpoint Email Protection8.1%
Trellix Collaboration Security2.1%
Other89.8%
Email Security
 

Featured Reviews

IS
Threat Hunter at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Email protection has reduced phishing workload and keeps unwanted messages out of inboxes
A few things about how Proofpoint Email Protection can be improved include implementing artificial intelligence within their platform to start really understanding the organization that is using their product, what sort of emails they are expecting and if the emails that are being expected should be let in and if the emails that are not being expected should not be let in. I'll give you a further example for this. If someone just tries to send an email from a Gmail address, which is a free public service email service provider, then because anyone in the world can create a Gmail account, I think it is nice and good for Proofpoint Email Protection to actually first check and do a reality check if we have received an email from this address and look at the intent of the email to really see what the email is trying to do and then classify based on that. I still see there is a lack. Hence why I started this conversation with AI and hoping that Proofpoint Email Protection will bring AI in and to really start analyzing these emails, the intent, and whether they really fit the customer organization. We are a manufacturing company, so whether it really fits that profile. I would say if we can get a better user experience from Proofpoint Email Protection products, that would be good. For example, other service providers that provide secure email gateway have the functionality where you can split promotional and bulk email and have them sent to a separate folder. I think if we can have that sort of feature, that would be great where Proofpoint Email Protection just keeps the important emails in the inbox folder and move everything else that is not really business related into a promotional, spam, bulk folder. This is an improvement that I would really like to see. I give it an eight because I am expecting a lot more from Proofpoint Email Protection, more automations, more understanding of who their customer is, what sort of business they do, and what sort of email they are supposed to be receiving and letting through. I think the day when I really have only 1% of work to do and 99% is automated by whatever automation services Proofpoint Email Protection uses would be ideal. I think I have covered any other improvements needed for Proofpoint Email Protection pretty well right from AI to splitting emails based on priorities. I think I have given some pretty broad and good examples.
Felipe Antoniazzi - PeerSpot reviewer
Cybersecurity Engineer Lead at Johnson & Johnson
Real-time threat response has boosted detection accuracy and reduces manual investigation work
I have had challenges in the past with Trellix Collaboration Security for implementation because of issues related to compatibility. Since we worked in a global company with different operating systems, it was necessary to create different plans and different actions to implement the product.One thing I really do not prefer in Trellix Collaboration Security is not related to the console. I am a McAfee fan since the McAfee tool, and I find the console of Trellix Collaboration Security to be very user-friendly and easy to use. However, I do not know if it is related to the architecture of the product. Of course, we have modern threats based on behaviors and zero days. We have today CrowdStrike and SentinelOne, where we have better results based on threats and behavior, where it is possible to create a simulation environment based on the file detected and based on it, confirm if it really is malicious or not. In general, I believe Trellix Collaboration Security improved the console based on the last console of McAfee, but I think it is possible to improve more. It really is a good product, but in my view, it needs to improve detection based on behaviors. Regarding automations, I have implemented Trellix Collaboration Security here at Johnson & Johnson, and I implemented it in the same situation at Santander Bank and BNP Paribas Bank, where I created automations to export data for different metrics, including malicious detections, compliance, baselines, scans, last scans based on the seven days, and checking of patterns. I export everything to CSV files. Based on that, I create Power BI dashboards, and in these Power BI dashboards, I have a more executive view for different metrics to provide to myself, my manager, or director to create an executive view based on it. Another important point we use here at Johnson & Johnson and other companies is a data hub or a SIEM solution, such as Elastic or ArcSight, where we select some logs to be sent and use it to build reports and metrics.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Healthcare Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise16
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Proofpoint Email Protection?
In terms of pricing, it is okay compared to others. I would say it is normal. Additional costs do come in, but it enhances security.
What needs improvement with Proofpoint Email Protection?
I have not seen specific outcomes or metrics since implementing Proofpoint Email Protection, such as a reduction in phishing incidents or improved response time. Proofpoint Email Protection can imp...
What do you like most about FireEye Email Security?
One of the valuable features of the product stems from the fact that it is easy to implement the tool in our environment.
What needs improvement with FireEye Email Security?
I have had challenges in the past with Trellix Collaboration Security for implementation because of issues related to compatibility. Since we worked in a global company with different operating sys...
What is your primary use case for FireEye Email Security?
In my field, I have been in the information security area for 17 years, and I am currently working in my position for a year and a half.I have worked with Trellix Collaboration Security for several...
 

Also Known As

Proofpoint Enterprise Protection, Proofpoint Digital Protection
FireEye Email Security
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Blocket, University of Waterloo, Lincoln Memorial University, WellSpan Health, U-Haul, Carestream Health, Westinghouse
Northshore Utility District, Luz Technologies, Air Academy Federal Credit Union, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, State of Missouri, City and County of San Francisco, Denver Public Schools, Vodafone, Go Auto, Stater Bros. Market
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint Email Protection vs. Trellix Collaboration Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.