Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Proofpoint’s ZenGuide vs Sophos Phish Threat comparison

Proofpoint and Sophos are both solutions in the Security Awareness Training category. Proofpoint is ranked #12, while Sophos is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.3. Proofpoint holds a 4.2% mindshare in SAT, compared to Sophos’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Proofpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sophos users who would recommend it.
Proofpoint’s ZenGuide
Read 2 Proofpoint’s ZenGuide reviews
  • 178 Views
  • 132 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Sophos Phish Threat
Read 12 Sophos Phish Threat reviews
  • 342 Views
  • 187 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 2, 2025

Proofpoint’s ZenGuide and Sophos Phish Threat compete in the cybersecurity training space. Sophos Phish Threat seems to have an advantage with its comprehensive features and advanced offerings.

Features: ZenGuide provides broad phishing simulations, training capabilities, and intuitive reporting tools. Sophos Phish Threat offers extensive phishing simulations, customizable training modules, and robust analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ZenGuide features an easy deployment model backed by responsive customer service for a swift setup. Sophos Phish Threat ensures efficient deployment with thorough onboarding and an active support community, providing a holistic experience for IT teams.

Pricing and ROI: ZenGuide's setup costs are appealing, delivering solid ROI with scalable options without high upfront investments. Sophos Phish Threat, though initially pricier, offsets its cost with high ROI through impactful security improvements and enhanced staff proficiency.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Proofpoint’s ZenGuide vs. Sophos Phish Threat Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Proofpoint’s ZenGuide vs. Sophos Phish Threat
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,823 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Proofpoint’s ZenGuide
Ranking in Security Awareness Training
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sophos Phish Threat
Ranking in Security Awareness Training
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Security Awareness Training category, the mindshare of Proofpoint’s ZenGuide is 4.2%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Phish Threat is 4.7%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Awareness Training
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Customizable features and seamless setup enhance security training
In my opinion, some of the most valuable features of Proofpoint's ZenGuide include the customization, allowing us to add our own branding and themes to the automated emails that are sent, as well as the training. The phishing simulations, from what I've seen so far, run pretty well. There's a significant amount of campaign options to choose from. I appreciate how customizable they are so that we can fine-tune it to specifically target things related to what we work on. The training content seems comparable based on what I've seen compared to other tools such as KnowBe4 ( /products/knowbe4-reviews ). The implementation of Proofpoint's ZenGuide has affected my IT team's workload regarding email security management, but not significantly. Most of these features seem fairly automated and easy to set up. For example, setting up a phishing campaign doesn't take too long, so it hasn't affected us substantially.
Read full review
Shaun Gordon - PeerSpot reviewer
Identifies vulnerable employees through customized simulations
Sophos Phish Threat effectively identifies susceptible employees. It depends on knowing my staff. For example, if I receive an email claiming my Facebook account is compromised, I immediately recognize it as suspicious, as I don't have Facebook. If I know my staff use LinkedIn, I utilize the LinkedIn simulation. Similarly, if they bank with Absa, I use the Absa simulation. There isn't a single 'one size fits all' approach. Sophos Phish Threat ensures users do not click on dodgy emails or dodgy links within an environment.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Most valuable is the SSO integration with our AD, so the users can employ our federation service to log in."
"I would definitely recommend Proofpoint's ZenGuide to others, as I think the branding and the ability to add your own branding on all different avenues, through the email communications, training, simulations, and everything, is probably the biggest advantage I've seen so far."
"I find the solution's reports very valuable."
"Sophos Phish Threat is valuable as it is easy to use and effectively educates end users on the threats they may face and how to identify them."
"It is simple to push tests out to a group of users."
"The scalability is very good."
"It is easy to use."
"The solution is easy to integrate because it is on the cloud. We have been able to limit users to only accessing the Sophos platform by modifying the firewall and Sophos platform settings. The dashboard gives us detailed reports allowing us to be able to manage better."
"It is very simple to install and you can do it by yourself."
"The most valuable features of Sophos Phish Threat are internal web filtering and security."
More Sophos Phish Threat pros
 

Cons

"We would like to create reports for local IT leaders in a different way, more suitable for upper management."
"Sophos Phish Threat can improve by adding other languages, such as Mandarin or Cantonese to their online trainer video center, it would be helpful."
"The solution could be much more secure."
"It would be great if the price was reduced."
"I would like to see more manager-level training that teaches what needs to be done after a phishing email attack is found."
"There is a need for improvement regarding false negatives dealing with Office 365."
"The security of the solution could improve."
"Sophos Phish Threat can improve load balancing."
"The pricing of Sophos Phish threat can be improved."
More Sophos Phish Threat cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"received very good pricing, as we are also working with the Proofpoint spam appliances."
"The license for the product comes with the firewall offered by Sophos, so a user need not buy it separately."
"There is a license required for this solution and the cost depends on the number of users."
"The pricing is very good, and some of my customers who have used other vendors say that Sophos is priced well within the market."
"There are monthly and annual subscriptions available to use Sophos Phish Threat. The price is reasonable."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Awareness Training solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Performing Arts
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Sophos Phish Threat?
I find the solution's reports very valuable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Sophos Phish Threat?
There is a need for improvement regarding false negatives dealing with Office 365. The issue stems from policies in Office 365 that prevent scanning certain elements, which might trigger errors. I ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Sophos Phish Threat?
I use Sophos Phish Threat to test employee security awareness. Essentially, my clients utilize Phish Threat to ensure that users are not clicking on suspicious emails or links. It is a simulated ca...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

KnowBe4 vs Proofpoint’s ZenGuide Logo
KnowBe4 vs Proofpoint’s ZenGuide
Compared 62% of the time
SAP SuccessFactors Learning vs Proofpoint’s ZenGuide Logo
SAP SuccessFactors Learning vs Proofpoint’s ZenGuide
Compared 22% of the time
Proofpoint Email Protection vs Proofpoint’s ZenGuide Logo
Proofpoint Email Protection vs Proofpoint’s ZenGuide
Compared 17% of the time
More Proofpoint’s ZenGuide Competitors
KnowBe4 vs Sophos Phish Threat Logo
KnowBe4 vs Sophos Phish Threat
Compared 100% of the time
More Sophos Phish Threat Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Awareness Training
April 2025
Proofpoint’s ZenGuide reportDownload Proofpoint’s ZenGuide product report
Buyer's Guide
Sophos Phish Threat
April 2025
Sophos Phish Threat reportDownload Sophos Phish Threat product report
 

Also Known As

Proofpoint Security Awareness Training, Wombat Security Education Platform
Phish Threat
 

Overview

Proofpoint's ZenGuide offers cutting-edge technology designed to streamline cybersecurity operations, improving efficiency for businesses by providing comprehensive threat protection and enhancing incident response capabilities.

ZenGuide empowers organizations with sophisticated tools to manage cybersecurity challenges effectively. With robust features such as advanced automation and real-time analytics, it enables teams to respond swiftly to threats, maintaining a secure environment. Its agility in addressing complex security issues is a standout, providing organizations the means to enhance their defensive strategies.

What are the key features of Proofpoint's ZenGuide?
  • Automated Threat Detection: Increases threat identification speed, enabling faster response time.
  • Real-Time Analytics: Delivers actionable insights into security threats for more informed decision-making.
  • Integrated Incident Management: Simplifies coordination across security teams for streamlined operations.
  • Customizable Workflow: Adapts to unique business processes to enhance operational flexibility.
What benefits should users look for in Proofpoint's ZenGuide reviews?
  • Enhanced Response Rate: Reviews often highlight improved incident response times.
  • Increased Efficiency: Users report higher operational efficiency due to streamlined processes.
  • Cost Management: Effective cost control seen from reduced manual intervention and improved resource allocation.
  • Scalability: Many users appreciate its capability for seamless scaling as security needs grow.

Implementation of Proofpoint's ZenGuide varies across industries, catering to unique demands in sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology. Financial institutions leverage its compliance features, while healthcare benefits from its data protection capabilities. Technology companies often utilize its integration capabilities for agile threat management.

Proofpoint

Sophos Phish Threat emulates a range of phishing attack types to help you identify areas of weakness in your organization’s security posture, and empower users through engaging training to strengthen your organizations defenses.

Sophos
 

Sample Customers

Carnegie Mellon University, Royal Bank of Scotland, City of Garland, Texas
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Proofpoint’s ZenGuide vs. Sophos Phish Threat
May 2025
Free Report: Proofpoint’s ZenGuide vs. Sophos Phish Threat
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint’s ZenGuide vs. Sophos Phish Threat and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Proofpoint’s ZenGuide vs. Sophos Phish Threat report.
See our list of best Security Awareness Training vendors.

We monitor all Security Awareness Training reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.