No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs SuperOps.ai comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 5, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SuperOps.ai
Ranking in Patch Management
23rd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Qualys TruRisk Eliminate is 3.1%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SuperOps.ai is 1.4%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qualys TruRisk Eliminate3.1%
SuperOps.ai1.4%
Other95.5%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

SangramGupta - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Consultant at Deloitte
Automated patching has transformed risk-based remediation and now optimizes security workflows
I can highlight two areas for improvement. The first is better reporting flexibility and dashboard customization. Qualys VMDR has a great dashboard that I can customize, but Qualys Patch Management does not have a specific dashboard associated only with patch management and patch compliance. The customization could be improved significantly. The second area is third-party application coverage. Qualys Patch Management works very effectively when patching servers, internal servers, Windows, iOS, or Linux servers. However, when doing application security with third-party applications that require patches, it sometimes fails to complete the patch. The deployment issue with third-party applications needs enhancement, as even with integration, Qualys Patch Management is not able to deploy patches for some third-party applications. These are the two main points I can highlight for improvement.
Pradip Dey - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Solution Architect at Express Systems Limited (ESL)
Monitoring tool, user-friendly and interactive but experienced an issue with integration
The most valuable thing is that we can integrate any other solutions with SuperOps. Like, SuperOps is a monitoring tool, but for security, for backup, we can integrate with other solutions providers as well. I like the PSA tool. It is very user-friendly and interactive with the customer as well. We can, the customer, give feedback directly to the solution. There is no need for another communication channel, like a different email from Outlook or any other tool. From the same solution, we could communicate with the customer, and the customer could reply. So, it includes a collaboration tool with the customer. It could immediately pop up any problem that's at the customer end or in the end devices. Sometimes, it happens that we come to know about an incident negatively, but the monitoring tool gave me the information immediately.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are the ease of managing both first-party and third-party patching, the generation of dashboards, and the provision of real-time information."
"Qualys Patch Management is integrated with the vulnerability management solution itself, making it more useful and automated."
"Qualys Patch Management allows us to structure all the patches together and schedule patch management sessions."
"Policy enforcement requires less time for my team because users cannot avoid applying updates. The user can skip two or three times or for a maximum of eight hours. After that, there is no way to avoid it. It helps us keep the environment safe."
"Overall, I would rate Qualys Patch Management a nine out of ten."
"Patch management significantly helped us track and reduce vulnerabilities."
"The consolidated report we received from the solution was very time-saving because, in the dashboard, we could get all the patch details for a particular patch and all the assets listed."
"Qualys Patch Management gives me a single source of truth for assets and vulnerabilities that need to be assessed, prioritized, and remediated."
"The customer service and support are very good."
 

Cons

"The user interface could be more functional, with dashboards for patch compliance visualization and simplified error code language."
"Qualys Patch Management's pricing could be more competitive, as it presents a significant obstacle for many companies who find it unaffordable."
"They should focus on increasing the list of supported patches. New software or data is continuously released, and it would be beneficial if patches were updated in the knowledge base more quickly."
"Sometimes in Qualys Patch Management, patches fail due to agent communication issues with Qualys."
"Qualys could improve its randomized download feature and provide more detailed information about patch failures, including the reason for failure."
"In my opinion, there are areas within Qualys Patch Management that have room for improvement, such as cloud instance functionality."
"False positives were the biggest concern. We also had some concerns with respect to the Cloud Agent."
"The Qualys agent sometimes encounters authorization issues, leading to inaccurate vulnerability reports."
"I found some issues when I integrated the accounting software with Xero."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive. We get many more features at the same price compared to other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM. It is worth the money considering the services and features it has. Their support team is also awesome."
"Qualys is fairly priced."
"Qualys Patch Management is expensive."
"Qualys Patch Management offers a moderate price point, neither cheap nor expensive, considering its comprehensive functionality."
"Qualys Patch Management comes as part of a bundled package with several modules, making it a cost-effective deal for us."
"The licensing cost is more than 2,000 for the whole Americas region"
"Its price is competitive in the market. Compared to other solutions like Rapid7, Qualys offers a favorable price point and robust features."
"While the cost of Qualys Patch Management is slightly high compared to alternative tools, it is not excessively expensive."
"It is affordable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
10%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Performing Arts
10%
Healthcare Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise34
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?
Regarding the pricing aspects, I do not know the exact costs because we are not responsible for the procurement, but I can indicate around a 60% increase in revenue.
What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?
Qualys Patch Management could make a few enhancements to the reporting for various patch jobs. An ability to see specific reports on endpoints failing specific patches multiple times would be valua...
What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?
I advise other folks on how to use Qualys Patch Management. The use cases I have seen are to patch regular end-user systems, servers, and to patch all available vulnerabilities or some vulnerabilit...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.