You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs SuperOps.ai comparison

Qualys and SuperOps.ai are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Qualys is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9, while SuperOps.ai is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0. Qualys holds a 2.8% mindshare in PM, compared to SuperOps.ai’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Qualys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SuperOps.ai users who would recommend it.

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Read 57 Qualys TruRisk Eliminate reviews

4,457 Views
4,457 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

SuperOps.ai

Read 1 SuperOps.ai review

1,367 Views
1,066 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

SuperOps.ai

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 5, 2026

SuperOps.ai and Qualys Patch Management compete in IT management. SuperOps.ai has an advantage in pricing and support, while Qualys Patch Management offers more comprehensive feature robustness.

Features: SuperOps.ai provides streamlined IT management tools, strong ticketing, and remote access capabilities. It is efficient in task automation. Qualys Patch Management offers an extensive security intelligence network, comprehensive patching solutions, and broader security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SuperOps.ai is recognized for an intuitive setup process and responsive customer service, facilitating quick adoption. Qualys Patch Management, although robust, may involve a steeper learning curve, offering support that emphasizes enterprise-level customization.

Pricing and ROI: SuperOps.ai has a cost-effective model, appealing to smaller businesses, while Qualys Patch Management requires a higher initial investment. It offers a better ROI for larger-scale operations due to its extensive capabilities and security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Patch Management Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Ranking in Patch Management

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SuperOps.ai

Ranking in Patch Management

20th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Qualys TruRisk Eliminate is 2.8%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SuperOps.ai is 1.4%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys Patch Management	2.8%
SuperOps.ai	1.4%
Other	95.8%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

SangramGupta

Security Consultant at Deloitte

Automated patching has transformed risk-based remediation and now optimizes security workflows

I can highlight two areas for improvement. The first is better reporting flexibility and dashboard customization. Qualys VMDR has a great dashboard that I can customize, but Qualys Patch Management does not have a specific dashboard associated only with patch management and patch compliance. The customization could be improved significantly. The second area is third-party application coverage. Qualys Patch Management works very effectively when patching servers, internal servers, Windows, iOS, or Linux servers. However, when doing application security with third-party applications that require patches, it sometimes fails to complete the patch. The deployment issue with third-party applications needs enhancement, as even with integration, Qualys Patch Management is not able to deploy patches for some third-party applications. These are the two main points I can highlight for improvement.

Read full review

Pradip Dey

Chief Solution Architect at Express Systems Limited (ESL)

Monitoring tool, user-friendly and interactive but experienced an issue with integration

The most valuable thing is that we can integrate any other solutions with SuperOps. Like, SuperOps is a monitoring tool, but for security, for backup, we can integrate with other solutions providers as well. I like the PSA tool. It is very user-friendly and interactive with the customer as well. We can, the customer, give feedback directly to the solution. There is no need for another communication channel, like a different email from Outlook or any other tool. From the same solution, we could communicate with the customer, and the customer could reply. So, it includes a collaboration tool with the customer. It could immediately pop up any problem that's at the customer end or in the end devices. Sometimes, it happens that we come to know about an incident negatively, but the monitoring tool gave me the information immediately.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since implementing Qualys Patch Management, we have seen measurable improvements in remediation speed, reducing our patch turnaround time significantly from four weeks with a compliance of about 60% to about 24 to 48 hours for critical vulnerabilities with an average vulnerability count per device down to around 10."

"Qualys Patch Management has reduced our organizational risk by 99.9 percent."

"I would give it a ten out of ten."

"Qualys Patch Management excels with its user-friendly interface and comprehensive reporting features."

"We have all the information on one page. The dashboard provides comprehensive information on one page, making it easy to apply patches and monitor pending updates."

"The first thing I would say is the ease of use."

"Qualys Patch Management offers excellent features, most notably the Qualys Gateway Service, which caches patches and distributes them to agents, minimizing bandwidth consumption."

"Patch Management's most valuable feature is the ability to search for vulnerabilities using their QID."

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate pros

"The customer service and support are very good."

Cons

"They need to improve the user-friendliness of identifying how many devices are affected by a particular patch. It is not intuitive, and there should be clearer indicators or buttons to access this information easily."

"Qualys is definitely on the expensive side compared to other products such as Rapid7 or other tools, and that is the major disadvantage Qualys faces because of the cost factor."

"However, in terms of scalability, it still has the potential to be better."

"While Qualys Patch Management is a powerful tool, there are areas for improvement, such as enhancing patch-to-asset accuracy, improving deployment feedback and error visibility, optimizing bandwidth and performance, enhancing reporting customization and dashboards, expanding application coverage, and ensuring deeper integration with ITSM or other tools."

"Qualys Patch Management would benefit from enhanced integration to address its current limitations in patching new features."

"It works with Windows and Linux, but Mac patch support is not yet available."

"A patch contract is a bundle of patches that we are going to roll out. I would like to reference those patches from separate jobs. They explained at a conference that it cannot be done, but that is my main complaint. I wish that the whole schema was a little bit clearer because there is a little bit of cloudiness around it."

"The patch status and patch completion information should be improved. If a patch fails due to some reason, such as a Windows error, the error code that gets published should be more detailed."

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate cons

"I found some issues when I integrated the accounting software with Xero."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is affordable, but they should provide features as per the rate they are charging. We have a big infrastructure with about 80,000 licenses. We expect better support from the Qualys team. So, it is affordable, but more features should be there, and the support should be better."

"Qualys Patch Management is a cost-effective solution for managing our 43,000-plus assets."

"The pricing is reasonable and less expensive than the previous tool."

"The pricing is fair and within our budget."

"Qualys Patch Management's pricing is competitive."

"Qualys Patch Management's pricing could be more competitive, as it presents a significant obstacle for many companies who find it unaffordable."

"While the cost of Qualys Patch Management is slightly high compared to alternative tools, it is not excessively expensive."

"I'm unaware of Qualys' exact price, but it's more expensive than Nessus. With technological products, you need to pay to get the best."

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate pricing and cost advice

"It is affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

11%

Performing Arts

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	33

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?

Regarding the pricing aspects, I do not know the exact costs because we are not responsible for the procurement, but I can indicate around a 60% increase in revenue.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?

I think the schedules applied sometimes take longer; if the system can perform this work faster, it would be very helpful. Currently, with the latest version of Qualys Patch Management, I do not th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?

We are working with patch management for Ivanti, using it for patch management on workstations as well as servers. From Qualys perspective, we have performed VMDR, using PM, CA, Cloud Agent, and CA...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SuperOps.ai?

I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price. It is affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SuperOps.ai?

I have more experience with integration. So, as an integrator, I found some issues when I integrated the accounting software with Xero. Though we did solve it, if I could know the reason behind it,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SuperOps.ai?

We use RMM tool to monitor our endpoints and their security and the health of the endpoints. And it works fine.

See all answers

Comparisons

BigFix vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 12% of the time

Patch My PC vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 12% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 9% of the time

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs SuperOps.ai

Compared 23% of the time

Atera vs SuperOps.ai

Compared 21% of the time

Motadata ServiceOps vs SuperOps.ai

Compared 11% of the time

NinjaOne vs SuperOps.ai

Compared 10% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs SuperOps.ai

Compared 9% of the time

More SuperOps.ai Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

July 2026

Download Qualys TruRisk Eliminate product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

July 2026

Download SuperOps.ai product report

Overview

Qualys Patch Management offers asset visibility, risk-based prioritization, and automation to enhance security. It integrates with VMDR for vulnerability prioritization, ensuring efficient patch deployment and reduced manual effort.

Qualys Patch Management focuses on automating patch deployment and bridging the gap between vulnerability identification and resolution. It supports Windows and Linux servers, providing real-time assessments and comprehensive reporting. The integration with VMDR prioritizes risks efficiently, promoting collaboration between IT and security teams. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows, improved vulnerability response times, and enhanced remote management.

What are the key features of Qualys Patch Management?

Asset Visibility: Provides precise tracking of all assets across environments.
Risk-Based Prioritization: Enables prioritization based on vulnerability risk level.
Automation: Streamlines patch deployment to reduce manual workload.
VMDR Integration: Integrates with VMDR for efficient vulnerability management.
Real-Time Assessments: Offers immediate analysis and feedback on patches.

What benefits can organizations expect from Qualys Patch Management?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces vulnerabilities across systems.
Improved Operational Efficiency: Streamlines workflows for faster resolutions.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes manual efforts, reducing associated costs.
Cross-Department Collaboration: Enhances communication between IT and security.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Qualys Patch Management is pivotal for maintaining stringent security standards. It helps organizations quickly address vulnerabilities, crucial in sectors that handle sensitive data. The ability to integrate with existing systems ensures minimal disruption and maximizes resource efficiency.

Qualys

SuperOps.ai offers an IT management platform catering to the demands of modern IT organizations, streamlining operations with its efficient tools and functionalities.

SuperOps.ai is designed to enhance operational efficiency for IT teams by providing an integrated suite of tools focused on automation, monitoring, and service management. It helps users manage IT assets, automate repetitive tasks, and streamline service desk operations. Its intuitive interface and robust functionality meet the needs of IT professionals seeking to improve workflow and productivity. Room for improvement includes expanding customization options to better align with user preferences.

What are the standout features of SuperOps.ai?

Integrated IT Asset Management: Centralizes asset information for easy access and management.
Service Desk Automation: Simplifies ticket handling with automated workflows and notifications.
Remote Monitoring: Allows proactive monitoring of systems to ensure optimal performance.
User Collaboration Tools: Enhances team communication and project collaboration.

What ROI can users expect when using SuperOps.ai?

Increased Efficiency: Automated workflows reduce manual intervention, saving time.
Improved Asset Visibility: Centralized asset data aids in making informed decisions.
Higher Productivity: Streamlined processes enhance team output.
Enhanced Monitoring: Early detection of issues prevents potential downtime.

SuperOps.ai is implemented across industries such as IT services, consulting, and various sectors needing robust IT management. By catering to specific industry needs, it provides professionals with tailored tools to resolve IT challenges effectively.

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.