No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs SuperOps.ai comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 5, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SuperOps.ai
Ranking in Patch Management
23rd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Qualys TruRisk Eliminate is 3.0%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SuperOps.ai is 1.4%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qualys TruRisk Eliminate3.0%
SuperOps.ai1.4%
Other95.6%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

SangramGupta - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Consultant at Deloitte
Automated patching has transformed risk-based remediation and now optimizes security workflows
I can highlight two areas for improvement. The first is better reporting flexibility and dashboard customization. Qualys VMDR has a great dashboard that I can customize, but Qualys Patch Management does not have a specific dashboard associated only with patch management and patch compliance. The customization could be improved significantly. The second area is third-party application coverage. Qualys Patch Management works very effectively when patching servers, internal servers, Windows, iOS, or Linux servers. However, when doing application security with third-party applications that require patches, it sometimes fails to complete the patch. The deployment issue with third-party applications needs enhancement, as even with integration, Qualys Patch Management is not able to deploy patches for some third-party applications. These are the two main points I can highlight for improvement.
Pradip Dey - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Solution Architect at Express Systems Limited (ESL)
Monitoring tool, user-friendly and interactive but experienced an issue with integration
The most valuable thing is that we can integrate any other solutions with SuperOps. Like, SuperOps is a monitoring tool, but for security, for backup, we can integrate with other solutions providers as well. I like the PSA tool. It is very user-friendly and interactive with the customer as well. We can, the customer, give feedback directly to the solution. There is no need for another communication channel, like a different email from Outlook or any other tool. From the same solution, we could communicate with the customer, and the customer could reply. So, it includes a collaboration tool with the customer. It could immediately pop up any problem that's at the customer end or in the end devices. Sometimes, it happens that we come to know about an incident negatively, but the monitoring tool gave me the information immediately.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"A single source of truth for vulnerabilities in Qualys is something we have achieved."
"The features I find most valuable in Qualys Patch Management include the ability to manage registry changes and run scripts both pre and post-patching. We have been able to apply workarounds for zero-day vulnerabilities efficiently."
"Qualys Patch Management has helped reduce our organization's risk by 20%, and we have seen an improvement in our patch rates."
"Qualys Patch Management leverages vulnerability feeds from the VMDR module, allowing us to identify vulnerabilities missing Qualys patches."
"Qualys Patch Management allows us to structure all the patches together and schedule patch management sessions."
"We can update the registry with special features such as Registry Update. We can also run scripts via the Patch Management module. These features are very helpful in our operations."
"Patch Management supports various software lists when compared to Microsoft Intune. It is especially beneficial for non-Microsoft applications. I can create a schedule, and various patches can be automatically deployed."
"The first thing I would say is the ease of use."
"The customer service and support are very good."
 

Cons

"False positives were the biggest concern. We also had some concerns with respect to the Cloud Agent."
"Room for improvement in Qualys Patch Management would generally be in fixing some bugs that I encounter most of the time."
"One area for improvement in Qualys Patch Management is knowing whether patches have been completely downloaded in a particular QGS appliance."
"They need to improve the user-friendliness of identifying how many devices are affected by a particular patch. It is not intuitive, and there should be clearer indicators or buttons to access this information easily."
"There is room for improvement in terms of adding more patches. Not all patches are available for deployment on Qualys Patch Management, so collaborating with various vendors to provide new patches would be beneficial."
"However, it would be good to have more widgets and AI-generated reports. I have not seen anything related to AI with Qualys."
"Since we do not have that solution criteria, we end up calling multiple teams and asking them what version needs to be deployed."
"There is room for improvement in the inclusion of more patches. Not all patches are available on Qualys, so they need to get licenses for other patches as well."
"I found some issues when I integrated the accounting software with Xero."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."
"It is affordable, but they should provide features as per the rate they are charging. We have a big infrastructure with about 80,000 licenses. We expect better support from the Qualys team. So, it is affordable, but more features should be there, and the support should be better."
"Qualys Patch Management offers a moderate price point, neither cheap nor expensive, considering its comprehensive functionality."
"From what I have heard, Qualys Patch Management is pricey, which is a main barrier to entry. Another aspect that I do not like about Qualys is that they do not add new patch management functionalities to the existing package. It is a separate SKU, so you have to pay more money."
"The licensing cost is more than 2,000 for the whole Americas region"
"The pricing is reasonable and competitive. We get many more features at the same price compared to other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM. It is worth the money considering the services and features it has. Their support team is also awesome."
"The pricing is reasonable and less expensive than the previous tool."
"While the cost of Qualys Patch Management is slightly high compared to alternative tools, it is not excessively expensive."
"It is affordable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Performing Arts
10%
Healthcare Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise35
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?
The pricing and licensing for Qualys TruRisk Eliminate were reasonable for the capabilities provided. The setup was straightforward, although the licensing structure could be a little simpler and m...
What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?
Qualys TruRisk Eliminate is strong overall, but the user interface and reporting could be made more intuitive. More customization in dashboards and easier integration with other security tools woul...
What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?
My main use case for Qualys TruRisk Eliminate is to identify and prioritize critical security risks across our IT environment. Day-to-day, I use it to assess vulnerabilities, understand the risk le...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, Ivanti and others in Patch Management. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.