Red Canary vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense comparison

Red Canary, a Zscaler company and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Red Canary, a Zscaler company is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0, while Trellix is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. Red Canary, a Zscaler company holds a 1.9% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Red Canary, a Zscaler company users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Red Canary

Read 8 Red Canary reviews

5,571 Views
891 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Read 9 Trellix Advanced Threat Defense reviews

1,553 Views
1,351 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Red Canary

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense and Red Canary compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Trellix is often favored for integration and scalability, while Red Canary is preferred for features and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Trellix focuses on threat intelligence and malware detection through advanced analytics and integration capabilities, as well as a user-friendly interface and strong network protection. Red Canary shines with high-quality endpoint detection, response capabilities, proactive threat hunting, and comprehensive real-time alert systems.

Room for Improvement: Trellix can enhance its customization options and improve user interface intuitiveness. Users expect more straightforward analytics interpretation and faster updates. Red Canary might benefit from higher scalability, better integration with third-party platforms, and reduced false-positive rates to enhance detection accuracy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers seamless integration into existing infrastructures with extensive support that simplifies complex deployments. Red Canary provides straightforward deployment, making the initial setup easy, coupled with excellent customer service to assist during and after the process.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix generally offers more competitive setup costs, providing good ROI with its robust integration and threat protection features. Red Canary, although having higher upfront costs, promises substantial ROI through its proactive threat hunting and superior detection capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Canary vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Red Canary vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Canary

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

23rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (38th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (11th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (15th)

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Red Canary is 1.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is 1.9%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Trellix Advanced Threat Defense	1.9%
Red Canary	1.9%
Other	96.2%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Anthony Tuhame

Information Technology Manager at Everseen

Continuous threat monitoring has strengthened our endpoint protection and reduced false positives

Key improvements I would like to see include fewer false positives. I understand that almost all EDR or cybersecurity platforms cannot be 100 percent accurate, but I need to see fewer false positives. Another thing I want to see is improved threat detection accuracy. I want them to improve their AI and investigations and implement a faster investigation process. I would recommend them to invest heavily in machine learning. I would also recommend introducing onboarding calls before someone purchases the software because we faced a challenge whereby we had no idea about how to install it in our system. We had to rely on documentation and support, but if they could offer onboarding calls, it would be great.

Read full review

Philippe Panardie

RSSI at SDIS49

Ensuring long-term reliability while seeking internal email management enhancements

Prisma is a commercial name of the firewall now, but we don't work with the cloud product. Only our company is using it and we do not recommend it to customers. For us, it's transparent because it's a cloud product, so we don't really know the version as it's always updated. We have not had any problem, but it's difficult to report on what's going on because some days they can wash out perhaps 100 mails, and then it's difficult to say how many attacks you have reached. The right email has been washed out and then nobody has complained. We do not use the Threat Visualization feature; as we are in MX, the mail is washed out before it is in the mail inbox of the user, thus avoiding any problem requiring a reservation. In fact, there is no integration with existing security frameworks. The only problem we can have is that as we have no API interface, there is no inspection of internal mail. I rate Trellix Advanced Threat Defense a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution works well for what we use it for and the support and protection are good."

"The valuable features of this solution are it integrates well with different EDR software, such CrowdStrike, and Carbon Black, and the information it provides is helpful."

"Red Canary has positively impacted my organization because I don't have to spend and hire resources to look at logs, which has enabled us to do much more in terms of improving security across the organization."

"Red Canary has impacted my organization positively because we treat any ticket triggered by them as high priority due to the fact that 99 percent of the time it is a true positive."

"I am satisfied with this solution and it is very competitive with other similar EDR or MDR solutions because it provides very impressive information about the root cause of the threat, such as malware."

"Red Canary has impacted our organization positively by managing our security endpoints and being able to detect threats before they impact us negatively."

"The near real-time review translates into near real-time action. So, in addition to alerting, Red Canary MDR has response playbooks built out."

"I recommended Red Canary to my friends who work in other organizations."

More Red Canary pros

"The fact that in 10 years, we have had no problem is the most valuable feature for us; it's really a washing machine, but the only problem we face is that it's difficult to report on this product."

"I see ROI, as it stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business."

"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module."

"The features I find most valuable are: the management, the ability for automatic remediation of threats and it can successfully detect a threat, and to act upon it."

"It was easy to set up initially."

"Provides good exfiltration, and is an all-in-one product."

"If a system admin can put in the patience to read and constantly update the ePO system in terms of rules, enforcing them at regular intervals, you can safely go to sleep every night."

"It is very scalable."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense pros

Cons

"Red Canary can be improved by continuing to add new features and capabilities to what they are looking at, including the types of data they're looking at and the types of systems that they're integrating with."

"Key improvements I would like to see include fewer false positives. I want them to improve their AI and investigations and implement a faster investigation process."

"In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users."

"I would like there to be an on-premise version of this solution for our data centers because of the proliferation of online threats."

"The most valuable feature of Red Canary MDR is the overall threat protection it provides."

"Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions."

"I wish Red Canary could have a graph that shows the endpoint, user, and how it spreads, providing a visual representation to easily identify what happened."

"The price could always be better."

"Lacks remote capabilities not dependent on the internet."

"It was not complex, but there are things to look out for, because it's an intense product. It scans intensely and there are major obstacles to overcome if it scans while users are using a network, then it is not a good thing."

"This solution needs to be made "cloud ready"."

"Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version."

"I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology."

"Some of our customers have mentioned the lack of a tool that would allow for remote capabilities without being attached to the internet."

"We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats."

"Make the ATD appliance a part of the whole product offering and take the whole thing onto the cloud."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have not compared Red Canary to other solutions to know if the price is high or low. However, I have found the price of this solution fair and reasonable, it cost approximately $100 per year, per device. If they could provide the solution for $50 per year, per device, it would be better."

"Red Canary MDR I use is an open-source tool."

"The solution could vary in price depending on how many endpoints a company has."

"Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."

"The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Canary MDR?

The services are higher priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Canary MDR?

I wish Red Canary could have a graph that shows the endpoint, user, and how it spreads, providing a visual representation to easily identify what happened.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Canary MDR?

My main use case for Red Canary is that a Red Canary analyst monitors our logs, and if they see any abnormality, they create a ticket that we use to analyze the situation. We assign that ticket and...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

I would like to see an API interface for internal email and control of outgoing email to make it closer to 10. It's necessary; today we have an MX interface, and it would be interesting to have an ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

We are working with Palo Alto products, specifically firewalls. We are only using Palo Alto Firewalls and not Cortex. With FireEye and Trellix, we only work with ETP now because the NDR function wh...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

See all answers

Comparisons

Expel vs Red Canary

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response vs Red Canary

Compared 6% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Red Canary

Compared 5% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Red Canary

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 3% of the time

More Red Canary Competitors

NetWitness Platform vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 9% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 8% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

July 2026

Download Red Canary product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

July 2026

Download Trellix Advanced Threat Defense product report

Also Known As

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

McAfee Advanced Threat Defense

Overview

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR) offers robust threat detection, rapid response capabilities, continuous security monitoring, and seamless integration with existing tools. Valued for its actionable reporting and proactive threat intelligence, it streamlines operations and enhances organizational efficiency and security.

Red Canary, a Zscaler company

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense offers efficient threat detection and automatic threat remediation, featuring seamless management and integration with operating systems and extensions.

Providing robust malware defense, Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is easy to set up and use. Its components work collaboratively, with standout features like behavioral analysis, retro-inspection, and ePolicy Orchestration. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in Active Directory integration, cloud readiness, artificial intelligence, and faster sandboxing. The API interface and scalability need enhancement, while better compatibility with platforms like Cisco could elevate its function. Effective for server and endpoint security, it effectively blocks threats like WannaCry and disperses attack data through the DXL client quickly.

What are the notable features of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense?

Management and Automatic Threat Remediation: Facilitates seamless management and handling of threats.
Effective Threat Detection and Response: Delivers efficient and reliable threat detection capabilities.
Behavioral Analysis and Retro-Inspection: Offers advanced analysis for comprehensive threat identification.
ePolicy Orchestration: Streamlines processes for enhanced threat management.
Scalability and Price: Provides a stable and scalable solution at a competitive price point.

What key benefits can be identified from reviews?

Ease of Use and Setup: Known for its straightforward implementation and user-friendly interface.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with different operating systems and technologies like Palo Alto firewalls.
Threat Protection Efficiency: Proven effectiveness in stopping threats such as WannaCry.
Rapid Attack Information Dissemination: Utilizes the DXL client for quick data sharing.

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is widely used across numerous industries for server and desktop protection, ensuring endpoint security and halting attacks without failure. Its integration with diverse technologies enhances protection in varied environments, making it a valuable tool in enterprise security management.

Trellix

Sample Customers

DuPont, Quanta Services, Microchip Technology, Hopkins Public Schools, Henny Penny, Schumacher Homes

The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust

Buyer's Guide

Red Canary vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

June 2026

Free Report: Red Canary vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Canary vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Canary vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.