RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration comparison

RSA and Broadcom are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. RSA is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #23. RSA holds a 1.2% mindshare in IAM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of RSA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

RSA Identity Governance and...

Read 10 RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle reviews

1,016 Views
732 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Symantec Identity Governanc...

Read 66 Symantec Identity Governance and Administration reviews

2,415 Views
1,546 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

RSA Identity Governance and...

Symantec Identity Governanc...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and Symantec Identity Governance and Administration are products competing in identity management. RSA has an edge in pricing and support, while Symantec is favored for its features.

Features: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle offers extensive identity lifecycle management, user provisioning, and access governance. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration provides advanced analytic capabilities, risk-based entitlement reviews, and enhanced risk management.

Room for Improvement: RSA can enhance its reporting tools, improve user interface design, and expand integration capabilities. Symantec could streamline its complex deployment process, enhance usability, and offer better scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RSA provides a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Symantec, while offering dedicated support, has a more complex deployment process, which could benefit from simplification.

Pricing and ROI: RSA is recognized for its competitive setup cost providing strong ROI. Symantec, with a higher setup cost, delivers value through its comprehensive feature set and analytics, suggesting a viable long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

RSA Identity Governance and...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

20th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Identity Governanc...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (9th), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle	1.2%
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration	2.1%
Other	96.7%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

Harshul Nayak

Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Streamline identity lifecycle management with intuitive interfaces and robust policy features

The functions of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, especially the IGA, are quite strong with their custom forms and workflows integrated. The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall. However, it still has to be on-premise and the cloud version is not easily accessible, as dedicated instances are required and machines cannot be shared as multi-tenant for various customers. The advanced policy features of RSA definitely help in defining certain policies such as segregation of duties. That's particularly useful along with creating different access reviews. Regarding access control in simplifying access management, RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle has strong foundations of groups and roles, which help in defining all policies very easily. This makes it very easy to integrate with other access management tools or privileged access management tools.

Read full review

reviewer2183661

Managing Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Has an easy initial setup process, but its technical support services need improvement

The product's technical support could be better. The integration project requires a lot of technical details, so we need to find it quickly and easily. There was a large community of knowledge in the past. We kept it together and got the results. The community that works around the particular technical issue is shrinking. It used to be a specialized community that would help with the process. These particular areas need improvement. Broadcom is still using a hybrid cloud model, with some workloads on-premises and some in the cloud. They must start with the cloud adoption and move as many workloads to the cloud as possible. The on-premises environment is becoming stable. They need to rebuild that cost and the software. The product's pre-sales, technical support, and installation could also improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The data collection is excellent and easy to do. It does not require a lot of configuration nor does it require rules to be written like other competitors do."

"Soft and hard tokens for two factor authentication has been introduced."

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."

"Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."

"With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes."

"The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall."

"It improved security."

"The data collection is excellent and easy to do."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle pros

"The most valuable features are role-based access and identity provisioning, which allow a single point of user access to multiple places."

"When my architecture team and security team checked the solutions, CA has a better score than Oracle, and they had a better price."

"Using the implementation guide, I was able to implement the solution with ease."

"There are many valuable features within the solution; the product is easy to customize and it is also highly secure."

"Out-of-the-box connectors have a lot of opportunities for configuration."

"This product has helped us to have better rules for the application and grow the business process."

"I don't see any issues with CA, and everyone in the business is happy with CA and their support."

"We take identity management seriously and CA IDM is helping us to accomplish that goal."

More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration pros

Cons

"The stability of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve; it has some bugs that need to be fixed."

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved."

"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring."

"We were excited that the self-provision feature was now built into the box but disappointed at the implementation."

"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."

"It could be a little more flexible with the installation of the product."

"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."

"It was expensive initially, but day to day costs are minimal."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle cons

"The product has a lot of need for improvement."

"Reporting could be improved."

"Subsequent functionality within CA IM is not appropriately documented creating issues."

"We've met with the product development folks, and as far as improvements, we're really looking at them from a user experience."

"It should be better when doing custom connections."

"We found that if you create a certification with a high number of objects, the portal runs slowly."

"If you analyze the evolution of these type of solutions, there are still uncovered needs and the customers are still identifying needs."

"Identity manager is very complex and you must have the knowledge and skills required to use it."

More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."

"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."

"Pricing and licensing models are adequate and reasonable."

"Compared to other options, CA products are not that expensive."

"The connector is free, and bundled with the product."

"Symantec keeps increasing the price. I rate its pricing a seven on a scale of ten."

"The product has a good price in competition with another product with the same solution."

"The price is based on the number of users."

"I do not recall the approximate prices or licensing models, although I do so that it was priced per user number."

"The price is flexible for our existing customers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Manufacturing Company

13%

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

There is room for improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle. As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved fu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

We provide RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle as a service, mainly to oversee the digital identity lifecycle, from the initiation to the off-boarding at the end of that digital identity. Our cli...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

Overall, I would rate RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle at an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Identity Governance and Administration?

The pricing has been very reasonable, but licensing costs vary based on the customer. It follows a user-based licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Identity Governance and Administration?

Symantec should develop a SaaS solution for cloud environments to make the solution available in various marketplaces for easy deployment. It should also offer bundle installation instead of one by...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Identity Governance and Administration?

I am a consultant and we consult for identity and network management. We work with Symantec, which is owned by Broadcom, and also with Microsoft and Oracle. Additionally, we work with open-source s...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 38% of the time

One Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 13% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Identity Governance vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 7% of the time

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Competitors

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 12% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 10% of the time

Omada Identity vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Identity Management vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 7% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 5% of the time

More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

March 2026

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report

Download RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

February 2026

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration report

Download Symantec Identity Governance and Administration product report

Also Known As

SecurID

CA Identity Suite, Symantec IGA, Layer7 Identity Suite, CA Identity Manager (CA IDM), CA Identity Minder, CA IAM, CA Identity Manager (CA IDM), CA Identity Governance

Overview

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.

RSA

The Symantec Identity Governance and Administration (formerly CA Identity Suite) provides comprehensive identity management and governance capabilities with a simple, intuitive user experience. This user experience can dramatically simplify processes such as user access requests and access certifications, resulting in improved productivity and user satisfaction. In addition, the Symantec Identity Governance and Administration performs risk analysis and certification and enables remediation actions in real-time during the access provisioning steps, thereby improving audit performance and risk posture with preventive policy enforcement.

While providing these business and governance-centric capabilities for business users, the Symantec Identity Governance and Administration also delivers core enterprise-grade identity management and governance capabilities, including broad provisioning support for on-premise and cloud apps, extensibility and flexibility to integrate with other IT systems and consumer-grade scale. This means organizations are not forced to choose between usability and performance. With the Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, they can have both.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center

Acciona, Core Blox, DBS

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

March 2026

Free Report: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.