RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration comparison

RSA and Broadcom are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. RSA is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #25. RSA holds a 1.1% mindshare in IAM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of RSA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

RSA Identity Governance and...

Read 10 RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle reviews

926 Views
732 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Symantec Identity Governanc...

Read 66 Symantec Identity Governance and Administration reviews

2,071 Views
1,325 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

RSA Identity Governance and...

Symantec Identity Governanc...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and Symantec Identity Governance and Administration are products competing in identity management. RSA has an edge in pricing and support, while Symantec is favored for its features.

Features: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle offers extensive identity lifecycle management, user provisioning, and access governance. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration provides advanced analytic capabilities, risk-based entitlement reviews, and enhanced risk management.

Room for Improvement: RSA can enhance its reporting tools, improve user interface design, and expand integration capabilities. Symantec could streamline its complex deployment process, enhance usability, and offer better scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RSA provides a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Symantec, while offering dedicated support, has a more complex deployment process, which could benefit from simplification.

Pricing and ROI: RSA is recognized for its competitive setup cost providing strong ROI. Symantec, with a higher setup cost, delivers value through its comprehensive feature set and analytics, suggesting a viable long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

RSA Identity Governance and...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Identity Governanc...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

25th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle	1.1%
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration	1.8%
Other	97.1%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

Harshul Nayak

Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Streamline identity lifecycle management with intuitive interfaces and robust policy features

The functions of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, especially the IGA, are quite strong with their custom forms and workflows integrated. The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall. However, it still has to be on-premise and the cloud version is not easily accessible, as dedicated instances are required and machines cannot be shared as multi-tenant for various customers. The advanced policy features of RSA definitely help in defining certain policies such as segregation of duties. That's particularly useful along with creating different access reviews. Regarding access control in simplifying access management, RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle has strong foundations of groups and roles, which help in defining all policies very easily. This makes it very easy to integrate with other access management tools or privileged access management tools.

Read full review

reviewer2183661

Managing Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Has an easy initial setup process, but its technical support services need improvement

The product's technical support could be better. The integration project requires a lot of technical details, so we need to find it quickly and easily. There was a large community of knowledge in the past. We kept it together and got the results. The community that works around the particular technical issue is shrinking. It used to be a specialized community that would help with the process. These particular areas need improvement. Broadcom is still using a hybrid cloud model, with some workloads on-premises and some in the cloud. They must start with the cloud adoption and move as many workloads to the cloud as possible. The on-premises environment is becoming stable. They need to rebuild that cost and the software. The product's pre-sales, technical support, and installation could also improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."

"The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall."

"Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."

"RSA Identity Governance and lifecycles are good for the access certification and auditing sections."

"The data collection is excellent and easy to do. It does not require a lot of configuration nor does it require rules to be written like other competitors do."

"With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes."

"It offers a nice price. It's mid-range."

"The automated provisioning feature has been very key from an identity management point of view."

"What I found most valuable in Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is its simple GUI. It's also easy to deploy compared to other products. With other products, you have to install the Windows version inside the Windows machine on all units, but with Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, it can work offline, so the solution is a little bit easier than other systems."

"Word mining and risk campaigns are the most valuable features of this solution."

"Automated provisioning removes manual labor and manual provisioning."

"I like that it is easy to diagnose. It has a version of a virtual appliance so we can download it, run it, configure it, and it would take about 10 to 15 minutes to configure the cluster or so."

"Out-of-the-box the product has a lot of opportunity for configuration and sophisticated identity management capability."

"The product’s most valuable feature is flexibility. It can be customized as per the customer’s requirements."

More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration pros

Cons

"The user interface and workflow need improvement, and more connectors would help."

"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring. Additionally, there is not much scope for customization - everything is hard-coded and predefined, so it does not allow the developers to make many modifications."

"RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve out-of-the-box customization."

"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."

"Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy costs."

"If you use the appliance version then it won't handle a huge database volume."

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved."

"The support from Symantec Identity Governance and Administration could improve."

"The product's technical support could be better."

"Symantec is only on-premises, not on the cloud."

"Symantec should develop a SaaS solution for cloud environments to make the solution available in various marketplaces for easy deployment."

"It has a large footprint which you'd expect to be much, much smaller. Just to run basic services, we have 10 different servers. Also, if it were easier to manage, that'd be useful."

"They provide a framework to develop your own connectors. A connector is a piece of software that integrates with the solutions that are not a part of the support matrix. Currently, it is difficult to create these connectors in this solution. Other solutions, such as NetIQ Identity, provide a better way to create your own connector. Currently, there is no cloud version. It should have a cloud version."

"Although the capabilities are there, the user interface needs to be redesigned and the opportunities for integration should be improved."

"The drawback with the CA Identity Manager is they don't have a connector to HR systems like SAP, or PeopleSoft, or Workday. That's a major drawback with the CA Identity Manager. For that we have to do lots of custom quoting to get data from HR systems. And if they could connect it to GRC systems, that's good to have in an identity product."

More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."

"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."

"The product has a good price in competition with another product with the same solution."

"Pricing and licensing models are adequate and reasonable."

"Compared to other options, CA products are not that expensive."

"I do not recall the approximate prices or licensing models, although I do so that it was priced per user number."

"Symantec keeps increasing the price. I rate its pricing a seven on a scale of ten."

"The price is flexible for our existing customers."

"The price is based on the number of users."

"The connector is free, and bundled with the product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Marketing Services Firm

14%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

There is room for improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle. As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved fu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

We provide RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle as a service, mainly to oversee the digital identity lifecycle, from the initiation to the off-boarding at the end of that digital identity. Our cli...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

Overall, I would rate RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle at an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Identity Governance and Administration?

The pricing has been very reasonable, but licensing costs vary based on the customer. It follows a user-based licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Identity Governance and Administration?

Symantec should develop a SaaS solution for cloud environments to make the solution available in various marketplaces for easy deployment. It should also offer bundle installation instead of one by...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Identity Governance and Administration?

I am a consultant and we consult for identity and network management. We work with Symantec, which is owned by Broadcom, and also with Microsoft and Oracle. Additionally, we work with open-source s...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 49% of the time

One Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 17% of the time

Saviynt vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 8% of the time

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Competitors

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 19% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 13% of the time

Omada Identity vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Identity Management vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 7% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Compared 6% of the time

More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

January 2026

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report

Download RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

January 2026

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration report

Download Symantec Identity Governance and Administration product report

Also Known As

SecurID

CA Identity Suite, Symantec IGA, Layer7 Identity Suite, CA Identity Manager (CA IDM), CA Identity Minder, CA IAM, CA Identity Manager (CA IDM), CA Identity Governance

Overview

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.

RSA

The Symantec Identity Governance and Administration (formerly CA Identity Suite) provides comprehensive identity management and governance capabilities with a simple, intuitive user experience. This user experience can dramatically simplify processes such as user access requests and access certifications, resulting in improved productivity and user satisfaction. In addition, the Symantec Identity Governance and Administration performs risk analysis and certification and enables remediation actions in real-time during the access provisioning steps, thereby improving audit performance and risk posture with preventive policy enforcement.

While providing these business and governance-centric capabilities for business users, the Symantec Identity Governance and Administration also delivers core enterprise-grade identity management and governance capabilities, including broad provisioning support for on-premise and cloud apps, extensibility and flexibility to integrate with other IT systems and consumer-grade scale. This means organizations are not forced to choose between usability and performance. With the Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, they can have both.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center

Acciona, Core Blox, DBS

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

February 2026

Free Report: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.