Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP Hybris PCM [EOL] vs SAP Master Data Governance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP Hybris PCM [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Master Data Governance
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Messaoud - PeerSpot reviewer
JAVA/Java EE & SAP Hybris/CX Developer at SOFTParadigm
It has a good architecture and it's easy to maintain
We work with various clients and use Hybris for selling different kinds of products, including merchandise, electronics, ticket reservations, electronics, and food Hybris is stable and has good architecture. It's easy to maintain.  They can change their backend because it's a little hard to work…
UdayReddy - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech
Detailed technical support and data integration capabilities create seamless user experience
Regarding SAP Master Data Governance, there is significant room for improvement particularly concerning the replication types. For example, when a vendor master is created in Ariba and a request is submitted from the Ariba system, SAP Ariba directs it to MDG. MDG verifies the details entirely through PI/PO or CPI. Once MDG verifies the data, the request is submitted to the S/4HANA system, the target. After a final approval at all levels, the vendor number is generated, and the vendor code gets passed from source to target system. This number is available in both the Ariba integration in the systems and in SAP BPT code, as well as the S/4HANA system.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hybris is stable and has good architecture. It's easy to maintain."
"The main purpose of SAP Master Data Governance is maintaining a single source of truth for enterprise data, and it helps a lot and works quite well."
"SAP MDG has built-in integration capabilities with multiple systems/streams. We can also create custom interfaces if needed."
"User-friendly and provides customized reports and personalized data."
"It is a stable solution."
"We've found the solution to be quite flexible."
"The data capturing and data governance features are valuable."
"The solution is great at standardizing all of our records."
"The most valuable thing is what it does: data management."
 

Cons

"They can change their backend because it's a little hard to work with. They could streamline it with new technology."
"SAP could do better in attracting talent and simplifying technology adoption."
"RiverFront is a more modern and cost-effective solution compared to MDG. It is flexible and designed to handle big data, which MDG does not support well."
"Overall, they just a little bit more flexibility in terms of assigning roles or adding new roles. We have a longer approval process, so we need to break it down into more roles than what is typically available and we need to hard-code it."
"There is no clarity and direction on how to manage bills of materials (BOMs) or routing in MDG."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"The solution lacks some flexibility."
"The platform's pricing needs improvement."
"The technical support should be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive solution."
"SAP Master Data Governance is a licensed product. While there might be no upfront cost for the MDG component itself, you still need to pay for user authorizations."
"The cost of the product is not ideal."
"SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive product."
"The solution is costly."
"I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."
"The product is too expensive."
"The pricing is a bit too high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SAP Master Data Governance?
We've managed tens of thousands of updates within 30 to 60 minutes, and we can also replicate these changes to all connected systems.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Master Data Governance?
The challenge with SAP MDG is not only the cost but the resources. The skills required are niche in the market, and while you can purchase the product either one time or on a subscription basis, th...
What needs improvement with SAP Master Data Governance?
I don't see any disadvantages or areas for improvement that I can think of, to be honest. It's sometimes challenging when you have to develop custom fields, but then usually it works, even when dep...
 

Also Known As

SAP Hybris Product Content Management
SAP MDG
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NHS 24, Wholesale Sports Outdoor Outfitters, Nu Skin Enterprises Inc., FC Bayern Munchen AG, Tumi, The Kellogg Company
Convergent IS, CHIO Aachen, Dell, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), City of Boston, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI), AOK Bundesverband, eBay
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, TIBCO, Qlik and others in Master Data Management (MDM) Software. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.